• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Sharon Mason

University of Central Arkansas
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    8
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • University of Central Arkansas
    Department of Philosophy and Religion
    Associate Professor
Indiana University
PhD, 2016
APA Central Division
Email (login required)
Homepage
Conway, Arkansas, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Social Epistemology
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemologies of Ignorance
Feminist Epistemology
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemology
Philosophy of Religion
Feminist Epistemology
Epistemologies of Ignorance
Social Epistemology
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Metaphor
3 more
  • All publications (8)
  •  70
    Living for Pleasure: An Epicurean Guide to Life, by Emily A. Austin
    with Benjamin Rider
    Teaching Philosophy 46 (3): 425-429. 2023.
    Philosophy of Education
  •  789
    Philosophy for Living: Exploring Diversity and Immersive Assignments in a PWOL Approach
    with Benjamin Rider
    American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 6 104-122. 2021.
    In this article, we reflect on our experiences teaching a PWOL course called Philosophy for Living. The course uses modules focused on different historical philosophical ways of life (Epicureanism, Stoicism, Confucianism, Existentialism, etc.) to engage students in exploring how philosophy can be a way of life and how its methods, virtues, and ideas can improve their own lives. We describe and compare our experiences with two central aspects of our approach: engagement with diversity and the use…Read more
    In this article, we reflect on our experiences teaching a PWOL course called Philosophy for Living. The course uses modules focused on different historical philosophical ways of life (Epicureanism, Stoicism, Confucianism, Existentialism, etc.) to engage students in exploring how philosophy can be a way of life and how its methods, virtues, and ideas can improve their own lives. We describe and compare our experiences with two central aspects of our approach: engagement with diversity and the use of immersive experiences and assignments. In particular, we discuss how we recognize and center various forms of diversity in philosophy—cultural and gender diversity, but also diversity in how and in what forms philosophy can be done and what “philosophy as a way of life” can be. We also examine how the experimental and experiential aspects of immersive assignments promote deeper understanding and create possibilities for personal transformation.
    Epicureans, MiscStoics, MiscClassical Daoism, MiscClassical Confucianism, MiscTeaching Philosophy, M…Read more
    Epicureans, MiscStoics, MiscClassical Daoism, MiscClassical Confucianism, MiscTeaching Philosophy, MiscFeminist Philosophy, MiscHistory of Western Philosophy, Misc
  •  54
    Brett Coppenger and Michael Bergmann, eds., Intellectual Assurance, Essays on Traditional Epistemic Internalism. Reviewed by
    Philosophy in Review 37 (2): 56-58. 2017.
  •  44
    Daniel R. DeNicola, "Understanding Ignorance: The Surprising Impact of What We Don’t Know." Reviewed by (review)
    Philosophy in Review 39 (3): 121-123. 2019.
  •  71
    Food Philosophy: An Introduction, by David M. Kaplan (review)
    Teaching Philosophy 43 (2): 207-210. 2020.
    Philosophy of Food and Drink, Miscellaneous
  •  178
    Climate Science Denial as Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance
    Social Epistemology 34 (5): 469-477. 2020.
    Climate science denial results from ignorance and perpetuates ignorance about scientific facts and methods of inquiry. In this paper, I explore climate science denial as a type of active ignorance...
    Social Epistemology
  •  994
    Agent-Awareness in Reflective Knowledge
    Erkenntnis 84 (2): 239-255. 2019.
    I argue that current discussions of the epistemological significance of reflection have entangled concerns about reflection with agential concerns. I begin by showing that a central strand of internalist criticism finds externalism unsatisfactory because it fails to provide a particular kind of self-knowledge, knowledge about the epistemic status of one’s own beliefs. Identifying this internalist motivation as the desire for a kind of self-knowledge opens up new possibilities and suggests new co…Read more
    I argue that current discussions of the epistemological significance of reflection have entangled concerns about reflection with agential concerns. I begin by showing that a central strand of internalist criticism finds externalism unsatisfactory because it fails to provide a particular kind of self-knowledge, knowledge about the epistemic status of one’s own beliefs. Identifying this internalist motivation as the desire for a kind of self-knowledge opens up new possibilities and suggests new conceptual resources. I employ one of these resources—Richard Moran’s distinction between the theoretical stance and the deliberative stance—to locate two types of reflection: mere reflective awareness of one’s attitudes and agent-awareness of one’s attitudes. I then examine Ernest Sosa’s account of the importance of reflection, showing how Moran’s distinction brings out the centrality of agential concerns in Sosa’s argument for reflective knowledge. I also consider briefly its relevance to fully apt knowledge. While I focus on Sosa’s epistemology, the point extends to internalism more generally.
    Epistemological Theories, MiscVirtue EpistemologyVarieties of Knowledge
  •  60
    Robert Pasnau. After Certainty: A History of Our Epistemic Ideals and Illusions. Reviewed by
    Philosophy in Review 38 (4): 164-166. 2018.
    Knowledge, Miscellaneous
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback