Utilizing Schleiermacher's own theory of interpretation as stated in his Hermeneutics, this study analyzes and interprets On Religion, Speeches to its Cultured Despisers through the historical context in which they were written, and in the light of Schleiermacher's correspondence with friends and associates during the period of their composition. The censorship of religious writings by scholars on order of the King of Prussia was the overwhelming consideration that informed their composition. Th…
Read moreUtilizing Schleiermacher's own theory of interpretation as stated in his Hermeneutics, this study analyzes and interprets On Religion, Speeches to its Cultured Despisers through the historical context in which they were written, and in the light of Schleiermacher's correspondence with friends and associates during the period of their composition. The censorship of religious writings by scholars on order of the King of Prussia was the overwhelming consideration that informed their composition. The criteria for passing censorship were the doctrines of the Church of Prussia, as interpreted by state officials. The writings of such famous persons as Immanuel Kant and Johann G. Fichte had been denied the official imprimatur. Speeches was a product of Schleiermacher's struggle to write something that would pass the censor, while at the same time expressing his own views that would have to be judged as unacceptable to the censor, who was Schleiermacher's own personal sponsor, F. S. G. Sack. The result was a multi-layered text in the tradition of Descartes and John Toland, who also wrote such texts to pass the censors of their day. Like theirs Speeches has an intended "esoteric" philosophy contained in a publicly acceptable "exoteric" philosophy. ;The outermost layer supports the established orthodox Lutheran Christianity. The middle layer has two opposing sections: the first two Speeches advocate a universal or Spinozistic religion. The later section, the Third, Fourth and Fifth are written as an apology for the established Church, criticizing views that are in fact Schleiermacher's own true convictions. These criticized views are the deepest layer of the Speeches, expressing the free religious thought of Schleiermacher. Much of the text is purposely ambiguous. It is possible to identify several different groups as the "cultured despisers of religion:" his romantic friends, Fr. Schlegel and Henriette Herz; the philosophers Kant and Fichte, and even the King, the politicians and the church officials. The latter conclusion is supported by an ironic reading of the text, which is here held to be the key to Schleiermacher's own deepest purpose, which is to bring forth a new healthier form of Christianity from the ruins of a decadent state Christianity