Contemporary analytic color theorists ask, “Why can’t we see something as both red and green?” Goethe asks instead, “Why does the eye try to see reddish-green in a way not possible in nature?” To explain red-green unity, Goethe drew on idealist elements that took him beyond a pure empiricism. Virtually without exception, what has blocked our view of these idealist elements is a near universal misreading of Goethe as a pure empiricist. Hegel alone saw in Goethe’s red-green color experiments impli…
Read moreContemporary analytic color theorists ask, “Why can’t we see something as both red and green?” Goethe asks instead, “Why does the eye try to see reddish-green in a way not possible in nature?” To explain red-green unity, Goethe drew on idealist elements that took him beyond a pure empiricism. Virtually without exception, what has blocked our view of these idealist elements is a near universal misreading of Goethe as a pure empiricist. Hegel alone saw in Goethe’s red-green color experiments implied idealist elements that called for a different concept of unity. One flexible enough to allow for a concept of sameness that allows for difference. In this, we see an important anticipation of the structure that influenced Hegel’s unity-in-difference principle.