This paper explores the use of conspicuous electric light in film as a formal element that can induce a cognitive experience of false purposiveness, particularly in narratives with anthropogenic themes. It draws on Kantian formalism to argue that the experience of purposiveness without a purpose in art reveals a hubris in human nature, as we project our own concepts onto purposeless forms. The paper defines conspicuous electric light as the intentional use of stark and dramatic lighting and anal…
Read moreThis paper explores the use of conspicuous electric light in film as a formal element that can induce a cognitive experience of false purposiveness, particularly in narratives with anthropogenic themes. It draws on Kantian formalism to argue that the experience of purposiveness without a purpose in art reveals a hubris in human nature, as we project our own concepts onto purposeless forms. The paper defines conspicuous electric light as the intentional use of stark and dramatic lighting and analyzes four techniques: geometric chiaroscuro lighting, overexposure, lens flare, and light as a subject. These techniques are often used in films exploring themes of human ambition and self-destruction, as they create a sense of unease and a mood of hubris in the viewer. The paper also discusses cognitive science research on electric lighting, suggesting that we are naturally inclined to attend to light and that it can influence our emotions and motivations. Overall, the paper argues that filmmakers intentionally use conspicuous electric light to evoke a sense of false control and to mirror the hubristic nature of human ambition.