I am not a philosopher, my background is in architecture. My principal interest involves how technologies effect our ability to imagine worlds and grapple with the world. When I think about this I write about and draw about drawing that try to eek out the tensions within 'logos' that appear in the world as image and or speaking ....
I understand 'language' to be something not limited to writing or speaking nor even to primates but something probably shared and necessary to anything that lives. Bacteria with language. Sure thing.
I am reader of Heidegger and a gang of existential phenomenologists. I pick and chose from Heidegger especially …
I am not a philosopher, my background is in architecture. My principal interest involves how technologies effect our ability to imagine worlds and grapple with the world. When I think about this I write about and draw about drawing that try to eek out the tensions within 'logos' that appear in the world as image and or speaking ....
I understand 'language' to be something not limited to writing or speaking nor even to primates but something probably shared and necessary to anything that lives. Bacteria with language. Sure thing.
I am reader of Heidegger and a gang of existential phenomenologists. I pick and chose from Heidegger especially when it comes to his views on animal being, the German language etc. Nevertheless no other philosopher has better show how 'technology' is basic to 'being.' And, that's about as far as I am willing to go explain my interest in Heidegger here....
