-
14Mark Carl Overvold 1948-1988Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63 (1). 1989.
-
16Hans Seigfried, 1933-2006Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 80 (5). 2007.
-
63Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
-
Lying, deception, and related concepts : a conceptual map for ethicsIn Laurence R. Horn (ed.), From lying to perjury: linguistic and legal perspective on lies and other falsehoods, De Gruyter Mouton. 2022.
-
16Conflicts of Interest and Self-Dealing in the Professions: A Review Essay - Conflict of Interest in the ProfessionsMichael Davis and Andrew Stark New York: Oxford University Press, 2001; ISBN 0-19-512863-X (review)Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1): 161-182. 2004.
-
11Review of Nicholas Rescher: Human interests: reflections on philosophical anthropology (review)Ethics 102 (1): 166-167. 1991.
-
24[Book review] loyalty, an essay on the morality of relationships (review)Criminal Justice Ethics 12 (2): 36-42. 1993.
-
20Review of Fred Feldman: Doing the Best We Can: An Essay in Informal Deontic Logic (review)Ethics 98 (1): 177-178. 1987.
-
85Hare on utilitarianism and intuitive moralityErkenntnis 39 (3). 1993.InMoral Thinking R. M. Hare offers a very influential defense of utilitarianism against intuitive objections. Hare's argument is roughly that utilitarianism conflicts with defensible moral intuitions only in unusual cases and that, in such cases, even defensible moral intuitions are unreliable. This paper reconstructs Hare's arguments and argues that they presuppose the success of his problematic proof of utilitarianism. Contrary to what many have thought, Hare's negative defense of utilitariani…Read more
-
2Review of Nicholas Rescher: Human interests: reflections on philosophical anthropology (review)Ethics 102 (1): 166-167. 1991.
-
88Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
-
57Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.