• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Thomas Hall

University of Southern California
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    4
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • University of Southern California
    School of Philosophy
    Graduate student
Homepage
Los Angeles, California, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Mind
  • All publications (4)
  •  61
    Book Reviews (review)
    with Marcia Landy, Stanley Shostak, Arthur B. Shostak, John Shosky, Michael J. Seth, Gary Schwartz, Christian Roy, Anthony Pym, Jonathan Price, Joyce Senders Pedersen, Roger Owen, James R. Muir, Jeff Mitscherling, Thomas Loer, Walter Leimgruber, Matthew King, Michael Kammen, Fredrika Jacobs, Aniket Jaaware, Grant Havers, Heinz-Uwe Haus, Kristian Gerner, Steven L. Foy, Donald J. Dietrich, Terence Dawson, Andrew Cusack, Camelia Cmeciu, Margaret Sönser Breen, Ivan T. Berend, David S. Bell, Giorgio Baruchello, Sanda Badescu, and Mats Andren
    The European Legacy 17 (1): 103-139. 2012.
    Aesthetic AttitudesAesthetic ImaginationAesthetics and Culture, MiscAesthetic Cognition, MiscArt and…Read more
    Aesthetic AttitudesAesthetic ImaginationAesthetics and Culture, MiscAesthetic Cognition, MiscArt and Artworks, Misc
  •  43
    The Problem of Uncertainty, Elusiveness, and Absence of Meaning in Art History
    with Sjölin Jan-Gunnar and Rossholm Lagerlöf Margaretha
    Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 8 45-58. 2003.
  •  85
    Herod's Burning of the Jewish Genealogies in Gyðinga saga and in the Second Old Norwegian Epiphany Homily
    Mediaeval Studies 61 (1): 173-204. 1999.
  •  2030
    In Defense of the Compossibility of Presentism and Time Travel
    Logos and Episteme 5 (2): 141-159. 2014.
    In this paper I defend the compossibility of presentism and time travel from two objections. One objection is that the presentist’s model of time leaves nowhere to travel to; the second objection attempts to equate presentist time travel with suicide. After targeting some misplaced scrutiny of the first objection, I show that presentists have the resources to account for the facts that make for time travel on the traditional Lewisian view. In light of this ability, I argue that both of the objec…Read more
    In this paper I defend the compossibility of presentism and time travel from two objections. One objection is that the presentist’s model of time leaves nowhere to travel to; the second objection attempts to equate presentist time travel with suicide. After targeting some misplaced scrutiny of the first objection, I show that presentists have the resources to account for the facts that make for time travel on the traditional Lewisian view. In light of this ability, I argue that both of the objections fail.
    Presentism
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback