This paper serves as an entry point into the long-term research program developed by Timothy Speed. It is addressed to researchers who encounter individual works by the author without being familiar with or able to oversee the overall context of the extensive, interdisciplinary corpus. The body of work comprises theoretical texts, monographs, institution- and law-critical analyses, as well as artistic research outputs, which together form a coherent, operatorically organized research program. Th…
Read moreThis paper serves as an entry point into the long-term research program developed by Timothy Speed. It is addressed to researchers who encounter individual works by the author without being familiar with or able to oversee the overall context of the extensive, interdisciplinary corpus. The body of work comprises theoretical texts, monographs, institution- and law-critical analyses, as well as artistic research outputs, which together form a coherent, operatorically organized research program. The individual publications are not conceived as a linear chain of argumentation, but as recursive, structurally coupled operations that address questions of world-constitution, work, value, perception, and institutional violence across different epistemic registers. Central to the program is a non-representational, embodied epistemology emerging from neurodivergent perception, which understands knowledge not as representation but as a structure-constituting practice. Within the corpus, theoretical models do not function primarily in an explanatory manner, but operatively: they generate real epistemic, social, and institutional effects. The present paper does not provide a summary of individual texts and does not offer a didactic introduction. Instead, it outlines the basic structure of the research program, its guiding questions, central operators, and thematic clusters, and identifies possible entry points for different disciplinary backgrounds. Its aim is to enable orientation within a deliberately non-linear body of work, without simplifying or normalizing its epistemic logic. A part of the research program deliberately operates at the intersections of consciousness studies, theoretical physics, and epistemology, in order to examine the ontological.