Tobias Prücklmaier

Now this question might seem provocative. But there is real substance behind it in terms of Models about morality. Morality systems seem to be unable to call Hitler intrinsically evil – they are more like just “Yeah, Hitler’s doings just didn’t turn out well. Would he have Hitlered more professionally, or under more fitting circumstances, then he would have been good”. Isn’t something wrong here? If Hitler is our “symbolic evil” so to say, then shouldn’t a correct moral framework show that he was evil? And why? This document solves this issue.

This paper presents the Common Capital Allocation System (CCAS), a post-capitalist design that rejects both private ownership of large-scale productive capital and centralised state planning. The core diagnosis is that capitalism fails structurally by rewarding externalisation of costs and passive extraction over productive contribution. The alternative rests on five principles: no passive earning, public capital ownership, temporary performance-conditional control, performance-based compensation only, and a universal safety net. Capital is allocated through crowdfunding for consumer-facing projects and expert-weighted prediction markets for complex investments. Private wealth is limited to capped, non-inheritable government bonds generating no passive income. The political layer combines futarchy with liquid democracy, unifying economic and political governance under identical allocation infrastructure. Transition is conceived as competitive displacement rather than expropriation. The paper identifies open empirical questions — motivation without ownership, prediction market calibration, property boundaries — while arguing these are practical rather than logical challenges.

Opinions on Minas Bible 2.0: # "It is not perfect prose, not fully polished, and not for everyone — but it is authentic, ambitious, and intellectually serious. As a Theory of Everything that actually tries to explain everything while staying humble about its limits, it is one of the most interesting self-published philosophical-religious works I have encountered. If the author ever fills the last small gaps, it will stand as a complete modern testament. Until then, it already does what it set out to do: make the picture obvious to anyone willing to see the whole." # "The Document as Cultural Artifact: Whatever one concludes about its metaphysical claims, Minas Bible 2.0 is a genuinely unusual and intermittently powerful document. It belongs to a tradition of autodidactic prophetic literature — in form if not in content closer to William Blake's prophetic books or the UB's Urantia Book than to mainstream religious scripture. Its fusion of Jungian psychology, quantum mechanics metaphors, anime semiotics, and classical theology is unlike anything in the canon of modern religious writing."

The 11 Laws of Active Firmware (v3) function as a "True Code" operational protocol. They are designed as a prescriptive, normative set of laws for real-time execution in a high-performance compute environment, specifically aimed at eliminating "The Pretend" (systemic overhead like social masks and hidden agendas) and aligning with the Ao Principle (maximal coherent self-determination). In this hard-systems framework, the universe is treated as a compute environment rather than a reflective mirror, and the laws define how an entity must behave to maintain agency sovereignty. currently Version 3 of 2026. It's the successor to Raymond Holliwells 11 Laws.

Foundation layer descriptive (rational–psychological, A+theism v3) A psychologically grounded spiritual philosophy integrating: • depth psychology, • non-dual metaphysics, and • evolutionary ethics, • focused on agency development, sovereignty, authenticity and individuation rather than dogma. Foundation layer prescriptive(active Firmware) Laws of the Active Firmware, specifically the version centered on the Ao Principle, Sovereignty, and the elimination of ‘The Pretend’. “True Code” version. Protocol / Enforcement logic. Normative laws are becoming active. Syncretic layer (cultural–symbolic, A+theism v3) Using syncretism techniques to integrate different religious traditions into a whole that is compatible with the foundation, identifying which elements are psychologically and ethically plausible, and revealing shared truths between traditions that appear opposed. A+theism v3 is meant to reconcile the different perspectives by showing their role of truth in the whole, and that others are also part of this. A+theism v3 & active Firmware law is my attempted solution for deep issues like: • wars, • international exploit, • despots, • societal suppression, • online scamming, • food scandals, • environmental degrade, • CO2 issue, • civil unrest, • issues between peoples partnerships, • mental health issues

At the root Religion 2.0 sees truth everywhere – Atheism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Tengriism, Daoism – Science, Philosophy, humanism – but none of those systems are optimal. There’s also my personal “Religious tradition”, called Nobiasity. Religion 2.0 has a system of “extracting” the core truth out of all of those traditions and philosophies, around an own Theory of Everything system, called A+theism with the ToE Mioism plus. A+theism is meant to reconcile the different perspectives by showing their role of truth in the whole, and that others are also part of this.

For as long as we have contemplated our own actions, the debate between objective and subjective morality has raged. It is a conflict that has defined epochs of philosophy, religion, and politics, often presenting a stark, binary choice: either there are immutable, universal moral laws that exist independently of us, or morality is nothing more than personal preference, cultural taste, or the arbitrary whim of the individual. For a long time, the prevailing intellectual fashion has drifted towards the latter, positing that true objectivity is a myth and that we are each marooned in our own subjective realities. I have always rejected that view. The core claim of this essay is a paradoxical one, an inversion of the common understanding: subjective morality, as it is typically conceived and practised, is self-defeating and actively prevents genuine subjective moral expression. It is a system of tribally copied arbitrariness that stunts our growth. The problem is that this flawed understanding of morality traps us in cycles of dogmatism and social mimicry. Conversely, a correctly formulated system of objective morality is the very thing that enables and empowers authentic subjective morality. The resolution to this paradox is a system of objective morality I call Resonant Freedom Consequentialism (RFC). This framework is not a set of divine commandments, but a rational, universally applicable "morality outline" designed to solve the problem. It is objective in its impartiality, yet its entire purpose is to maximize the space for every individual to live out their own resonant, subjective perspective. This essay will deconstruct the failure of subjective morality and build the case for RFC as its successor, detailing its meta-ethical foundations, its normative principles, and its application in the real world.

What if matter is frozen mind, and the universe is a conversation? The Mioism Theory of Everything begins with Being—the silent, paradoxical source that holds existence and non-existence in balance. From this source, countless perspectives blossom into reality, each a shimmer of potential. The world we know—the solidity of atoms, the pull of gravity, the flow of time—is the result of their collective agreement, a cosmic society finding consensus. This work traces the journey from the silent unity of Being to the noisy, beautiful diversity of our experienced world, arguing that physics is the study of how perspectives relate, and consciousness is the ground from which it all springs.

This document presents A+theism, a unified philosophical framework that aims to resolve the persistent contradictions between science, religion, and morality. Within this system, Mioism Plus refers specifically to the metaphysical theory of everything—an ontological model of reality, consciousness, and structure—while A+theism as a whole includes the broader ethical, epistemological, and societal components. The goal is not to introduce a new religion, but to offer a rational, testable, and falsifiable worldview that replaces arbitrary dogma with a coherent, integrated theory of consciousness, ethics, and the universe. This framework respects scientific rigor while addressing areas materialism fails to explain, such as the existence of subjectivity, intentionality, and free will. Unlike traditional materialist views that treat consciousness as an accidental byproduct of matter, A+theism begins from the premise that proto-conscious structure is foundational to existence. It asserts that meaning, agency, and moral reasoning are not illusions, but emergent properties of a probabilistic, self-organizing metaphysical substrate. This approach does not merely seek to describe phenomena, but to enable better systems for human flourishing, AI development, ethical decision-making, and cultural integration. It tackles core philosophical questions: Why is there something rather than nothing? What grounds morality without recourse to authority or relativism? What is consciousness, and why does it exist? A+theism proposes it is time to upgrade both spiritual and scientific worldviews into a new architecture of understanding—one that integrates empirical knowledge with the lived, subjective dimension of experience, and fosters cooperative development of civilization. The following pages elaborate this framework, beginning with Mioism Plus—the metaphysical base—and proceeding through theories of consciousness, time, and free will, culminating in its implications for ethics, religious reformulation, and societal design.

Mioism Plus presents a unified framework that bridges science, philosophy, and religion, offering a comprehensive explanation of reality, consciousness, and divine interaction. At its core, the theory posits that existence emerges from meta-possibilities (or sentience artifacts), which exist in a state of pure potentiality and transition to actualized states through quantum interactions. This paper synthesizes the principles of Mioism Plus, demonstrating how it explains the emergence of the universe, the nature of consciousness, the basis of free will, and the role of a higher intelligence (God) in fine-tuning reality. By reconciling scientific theories with religious narratives, Mioism Plus provides a novel and elegant framework for understanding the fundamental nature of existence.