The present paper employs Aristotle’s notion of hylomorphism to explain the mimēsis of ethical properties in instrumental music. It argues that melodies, as temporal movements, resemble actions, while scales (harmoniai) function as forms that bestow melodies with ethical qualities – mean degrees of emotions. As these mean degrees are characteristic of virtues, music is held to be mimetic because appropriate melodies are perceived as representing virtuous actions. Music is then seen as an auxilia…
Read moreThe present paper employs Aristotle’s notion of hylomorphism to explain the mimēsis of ethical properties in instrumental music. It argues that melodies, as temporal movements, resemble actions, while scales (harmoniai) function as forms that bestow melodies with ethical qualities – mean degrees of emotions. As these mean degrees are characteristic of virtues, music is held to be mimetic because appropriate melodies are perceived as representing virtuous actions. Music is then seen as an auxiliary in the acquisition of virtue, as it habituates children, who are naturally inclined to emotional extremes, to feel appropriate emotions. The advantage of this reading is that it clarifies how non-verbal music can be understood as mimetic and possessing educational powers without a narrative that explains how one should evaluate different situations from a virtuous point of view. This reading also explains how, for Aristotle, music is mimetic in its own right, aside from its causal emotional effects.