Existing human rights models were designed for an era of visible violence and identifiable perpetrators. In the twenty-first century, harm increasingly occurs through digital, bureaucratic, and institutional systems that diffuse responsibility. This paper introduces the Human Rights+ Framework, an expanded model integrating three interdependent concepts: Invisible Harm (injury escaping recognition due to technological mediation or stigma), Harm Attribution Gaps (diffusion of responsibility for h…
Read moreExisting human rights models were designed for an era of visible violence and identifiable perpetrators. In the twenty-first century, harm increasingly occurs through digital, bureaucratic, and institutional systems that diffuse responsibility. This paper introduces the Human Rights+ Framework, an expanded model integrating three interdependent concepts: Invisible Harm (injury escaping recognition due to technological mediation or stigma), Harm Attribution Gaps (diffusion of responsibility for harm across complex systems), and Institutional Harm (damage generated by systems failing to act on known injustices). Drawing on autoethnographic experience within coerced cyber-labour networks and comparative institutional analysis, the study demonstrates how structural, digital, and procedural opacity sustain impunity. Building on Galtung’s structural violence and Sen’s capability approach, the framework reconceptualizes rights as protections against all preventable constraints on human flourishing—including those enacted by algorithms and institutions. The paper concludes with policy mechanisms for narrowing harm-attribution gaps and establishing anticipatory accountability in AI and governance.
