-
9Publisher Correction to: The Most Essential Moral Virtues Enhance HappinessJournal of Bioethical Inquiry 20 (3): 509-509. 2023.
-
26The Most Essential Moral Virtues Enhance HappinessJournal of Bioethical Inquiry 20 (3): 497-507. 2023.Eight moral virtues that have figured prominently in various cultures throughout history will be discussed: altruism, empathy, gratitude, humility, and the “cardinal virtues” of justice, prudence, fortitude, and temperance. The focus will be on how to understand them and what their relationship is to happiness. It will be argued that all eight essential moral virtues enhance happiness in most people most of the time. Their favourable impact on happiness may motivate humans to become better, whic…Read more
-
34Psilocybin: The most effective moral bio‐enhancer?Bioethics 37 (7): 683-689. 2023.This paper addresses the possible effects of psychedelic drugs, notably psilocybin, on moral bio-enhancement (MBE). It will be argued that non-psychedelic substances, such as oxytocin, serotonin/serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or vasopressin, have indirect effects on M(B)E, whereas psilocybin has direct effects. Additionally, morality and happiness have been shown to operate in a circularly supportive relationship. It will be argued that psilocybin also has more direct effects on the augmentation…Read more
-
54Guest Editorial: How Moral is Moral Enhancement?Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1): 3-6. 2015.Moral bioenhancement is a topic that will only increase in controversy as neuroscience advances.
-
17European Electronic Personal Health Records initiatives and vulnerable migrants: A need for greater ethical, legal and social safeguardsDeveloping World Bioethics 20 (1): 27-37. 2020.The effective collection and management of personal data of rapidly migrating populations is important for ensuring adequate healthcare and monitoring of a displaced peoples’ health status. With developments in ICT data sharing capabilities, electronic personal health records (ePHRs) are increasingly replacing less transportable paper records. ePHRs offer further advantages of improving accuracy and completeness of information and seem tailored for rapidly displaced and mobile populations. Vario…Read more
-
79Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost biasJournal of Medical Ethics 40 (4): 246-250. 2014.I discuss the argument of Persson and Savulescu that moral enhancement ought to accompany cognitive enhancement, as well as briefly addressing critiques of this argument, notably by John Harris. I argue that Harris, who believes that cognitive enhancement is largely sufficient for making us behave more morally, might be disposing too easily of the great quandary of our moral existence: the gap between what we do and what we believe is morally right to do. In that regard, Persson and Savulescu's …Read more
-
29“You hoped we would sleep walk into accepting the collection of our data”: controversies surrounding the UK care.data scheme and their wider relevance for biomedical researchMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (2): 177-190. 2016.An ‘Information Centre’ has recently been established by law which has the power to collect, collate and provide access to the medical information forall patients treated by the National Health Service in England, whether in hospitals or by General Practitioners. This so-called ‘care.data’ scheme has given rise to major and ongoing controversies. We will sketch the background of the scheme and look at the responses it has elicited from citizens and medical professionals. In Autumn 2013, NHS Engl…Read more
-
69Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms- which values should be considered?Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1): 1-27. 2017.Intensified and extensive data production and data storage are characteristics of contemporary western societies. Health data sharing is increasing with the growth of Information and Communication Technology platforms devoted to the collection of personal health and genomic data. However, the sensitive and personal nature of health data poses ethical challenges when data is disclosed and shared even if for scientific research purposes. With this in mind, the Science and Values Working Group of t…Read more
-
9“Involuntary (Moral) Bioenhancement” Can Add Value to the Debate on Human Germline Genome EditingAmerican Journal of Bioethics 22 (9): 54-56. 2022.Robert Sparrow (2022) concludes his article “Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit” with the following sentence: “The issues around genome-editing are complex e...
-
14The Ultimate Enhancement of MoralitySpringer Verlag. 2021.This book deals with good, evil, happiness and morally enhanced post-humans. It offers a succinct historical elaboration of philosophical stances towards morality and happiness, focusing on Kant's ideas in particular. Human augmented ethical maturity in a futuristic version of Kant’s Ethical Commonwealth implies, among else, voluntary moral bio-enhancement ; consequently, more happiness – as morality and happiness are in a circularly supportive relationship; ultimate morality. UM is in its own w…Read more
-
9How to Enhance MoralitySpringer Verlag. 2021.This book offers an innovative approach to moral enhancement. We, as humans, have a moral duty to be as good as we can be. Hence, moral bio-enhancement, if effective and safe, is our moral duty. However, it has to be voluntary because if it is made compulsory, human freedom would be curtailed. As freedom is an essential component of humanness, compulsory MBE would infringe upon our humanness. An essential question is; what will motivate humans to subject themselves voluntarily to MBE?The book ar…Read more
-
8What drives public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement and why it matters: an exploratory studyBMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 1-14. 2021.The paper represents an empirical study of public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement. Moral bioenhancement implies the improvement of moral dispositions, i.e. an increase in the moral value of the actions or character of a moral agent. The views of bioethicists and scientists on this topic are present in the ongoing debate, but not the view of the public in general. In order to bridge the gap between the philosophical debate and the view of the public, we have examined attitudes towards mora…Read more
-
18A future political framework for moral enhancementJournal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies 30 (1): 1-10. 2021.Various kinds of human bioenhancement represent a major topic of contention in both bioethics and futures studies. Moral enhancement is one of them. It will be argued that voluntary moral bio-enhancement should be based on an opt out moral enhancement scheme. Such a scheme would avoid the challenges of a voluntary moral enhancement opt in scheme. The former has a proper place in a minimal state. It will be explained why such a state can be called Utopia. The concept of voluntary opt out moral en…Read more
-
9Enhancing Fabiano’s Virtue Theory for Moral EnhancementAmerican Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2-3): 108-110. 2021.
-
16Confronting Existential Risks With Voluntary Moral BioenhancementJournal of Evolution and Technology 26 (2): 48-59. 2016.We outline an argument favoring voluntary moral bioenhancement as a response to existential risks humanity exposes itself to. We consider this type of enhancement a solution to the antithesis between the extinction of humanity and the imperative of humanity to survive at any cost. By opting for voluntary moral bioenhancement; we refrain from advocating illiberal or even totalitarian strategies that would allegedly help humanity preserve itself. We argue that such strategies; by encroaching upon …Read more
-
24Genome Editing for Involuntary Moral EnhancementCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1): 46-54. 2019.
-
22Introduction: The Ethical Frontiers of Gene EditingCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1): 4-7. 2019.
-
21Different games of moral bioenhancementBioethics 32 (2): 103-110. 2017.Rakić has serious misgivings about Wiseman's inability to frame ethical issues in the context of transcending existing realities with the aim of achieving what we believe is morally right. This inability to think beyond the present is misguided in ethics. He also criticizes Wiseman for making the unimaginative and unsubstantiated assumption that moral bioenhancement technologies have reached their zenith already. Rakić argues that MBE will become more effective in the time to come, that it ought…Read more
-
48Moral Bioenhancement and Free Will: Continuing the DebateCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3): 384-393. 2017.:This article continues and expands differences I have with Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu concerning issues of moral bioenhancement and free will. They have criticized my conception of voluntary moral bioenhancement, claiming that it ignores the extent to which freedom is a matter of degree. Here, I argue that freedom as a political concept is indeed scalar in nature, but that freedom of the will is to be understood as a threshold concept and therefore not as subject to degree. Consequentl…Read more
-
2Enhancements: How and Why to Become Better, How and Why to Become GoodCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3): 358-363. 2017.
-
20Incentivized goodnessMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (3): 303-309. 2018.It will be argued that humans have a rational self-interest in voluntarily opting to subject themselves to moral bioenhancement. This interest is based on the fact that goodness appears to be conducive to happiness. Those who understand that will be more inclined to opt for safe and effective moral bioenhancement technologies that have the potential to augment our motivation to become better. The more people decide to follow this path, the likelier it is that states will adopt suitable policies …Read more
-
15Commentary: Cognitive Enhancement: Are the Claims of Critics “Good Enough”?Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4): 693-698. 2017.
-
33The Issues of Freedom and Happiness in Moral Bioenhancement: Continuing the Debate With a Reply to Harris WisemanJournal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4): 469-474. 2017.During the previous years, Harris Wiseman has devoted substantial attention to my stance on voluntary moral bioenhancement. He argued that he has been influenced by that position, but nonetheless criticized it. I haven’t replied to his criticisms yet and wish to do so now. One of the reasons is to avoid my position being misrepresented. By replying to Wiseman’s criticisms, I also wish to clarify those issues in my standpoint that might have given rise to some of the misinterpretations. With the …Read more
-
17From cognitive to moral enhancement: A possible reconciliation of religious outlooks and the biotechnological creation of a better humanJournal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31): 113-128. 2012.
-
The Serbian Transition: An Explosive Cocktail of Politics and CultureActa Politica 35 322-339. 2000.
-
Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason as the Key for a Comprehension of Kant’s CosmopolitanismTheoria: Beograd 53 (1): 5-19. 2010.
-
Kant i Rols: od večnog mira do statusa kvo u međunarodnim odnosimaMoć, Rizik I Zaštita – Uvodjenje U Nauke Bezbednosti, 55-73. 2010.
-
18The current debate: (C+M) E and ultimate harmFilozofija I Društvo 23 (4): 87-96. 2012.Persson and Savulescu is a largely successful defense of the position promoted in Persson and Savulescu against Fenton?s critique of this position in Fenton. However, one of Fenton?s essential censures has remained without response: if moral enhancement is to occur at the genetic or biological level, as Persson and Savulescu suppose it can and ought to, it will not be possible without significant scientific progress, including cognitive enhancement by bio-medical means. I will offer a response h…Read more
-
1From Biology to Ethics: the Future of Evolution as Humanity’s Path to JucticeTheoria: Beograd 52 (3): 37-47. 2009.
-
27Integration of cognitive and moral enhancementFilozofija I Društvo 23 (2): 91-103. 2012.I will discuss four major perspectives on cognitive enhancement and morality: 1) cognitive enhancement is morally impermissible because humans are not supposed to alter what God has ordained or nature has shaped; 2) cognitive enhancement is our moral duty, because a cognitively upgraded human is a better human; 3) cognitive enhancement is morally permissible only if it is preceded by moral enhancement; 4) cognitive enhancement is morally permissible only if it is a means to moral enhancement. I …Read more