• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Wilfried Meyer-Viol

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    12
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    5

 More details
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Language
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Areas of Interest
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
20th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (12)
  •  8
    Indefinites as Epsilon Terms: A Labelled Deduction Account
    with Ruth Kempson, Rodger Dibble, and Dov Gabbay
    Article
  •  1
    Syntactic Computation as Labelled Deduction: WH a case study
    with Ruth Kempson and Dov Gabbay
    Article
    Proof Theory
  •  5
    Language Understanding: A Procedural Perspective
    with Ruth Kempson and Dov Gabbay
    Article
    Knowledge of Language
  •  5
    Relative clauses, left-periphery effects, and the dynamics of language processing
    with Ruth Kempson
    Article
  •  68
    Incrementality and Intention-Recognition in Utterance Processing
    with Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Ruth Kempson, Matthew Purver, Gregory Mills, Ronnie Cann, and Patrick G. T. Healey
    Dialogue and Discourse 2 (1): 199-232. 2011.
  • Growth of logical form: the dynamics of syntax
    with Ruth Kempson and Masayuki Otsuka
    In Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.), Meaning: the dynamic turn, Elsevier Science. 2003.
    Carnap: Works
  • Indefinites and Scope Choice
    with Ruth Kempson
    In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and beyond, Oxford University Press. 2004.
    SemanticsScope
  •  143
    Reference time and the English past tenses
    with H. S. Jones
    Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (3): 223-256. 2011.
    We offer a formal account of the English past tenses. We see the perfect as having reference time at speech time and the preterite as having reference time at event time. We formalize four constraints on reference time, which we bundle together under the term ‘perspective’. Once these constraints are satisfied at the different reference times of the perfect and preterite, the contrasting functions of these tenses are explained. Thus we can account formally for the ‘definiteness effect’ and the ‘…Read more
    We offer a formal account of the English past tenses. We see the perfect as having reference time at speech time and the preterite as having reference time at event time. We formalize four constraints on reference time, which we bundle together under the term ‘perspective’. Once these constraints are satisfied at the different reference times of the perfect and preterite, the contrasting functions of these tenses are explained. Thus we can account formally for the ‘definiteness effect’ and the ‘lifetime effect’ of the perfect, for the fact that the perfect seems to ‘explain’ something about the present, and that the perfect cannot presuppose a past time point. We explain why perfect and preterite can sometimes be interchangeable, and we offer a solution to the ’present perfect puzzle’. We explain the unacceptability of notorious examples of the perfect such as * Gutenberg has discovered the art of printing . We give greater definition to the familiar notions of ‘current relevance’ and ‘extended now’
    Temporal Expressions
  •  1
    Instantial Logic
    Universtiteit Utrecht. 1995.
    Logics
  •  73
    Linguistics, Logic and Finite Trees
    with Patrick Blackburn
    Logic Journal of the IGPL 2 (1): 3-29. 1994.
    A modal logic is developed to deal with finite ordered binary trees a they are used in linguistics. A modal language is introduced with operators for the ‘mother of’, ‘first daughter of’ and ‘second daughter of’ relations together with their transitive reflexive closures. The relevant class of tree models is defined and three linguistic applications of this language are discussed: context free grammars, command relations, and trees decorated with feature structures. An axiomatic proof system is …Read more
    A modal logic is developed to deal with finite ordered binary trees a they are used in linguistics. A modal language is introduced with operators for the ‘mother of’, ‘first daughter of’ and ‘second daughter of’ relations together with their transitive reflexive closures. The relevant class of tree models is defined and three linguistic applications of this language are discussed: context free grammars, command relations, and trees decorated with feature structures. An axiomatic proof system is given for which completeness is shown with respect to the class of finite ordered binary trees. A number of decidability results follow
    Logics
  •  44
    Modal logic and model-theoretic syntax
    with Patrick Blackburn
    In Maarten de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 29--60. 1997.
    LogicsModal and Intensional Logic
  •  46
    A Proof-theoretic Treatment Of Assignments
    Logic Journal of the IGPL 3 (2-3): 223-242. 1995.
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsProof Theory
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback