Cyberism treats cyberspace as a basic domain of existence and coordinates cyber, physical, social and thinking relations through the cyber-physical-social-thinking (CPST) framework. Cybersophy supplies cognitive, ethical, existential and axiological orientation, while Cyberlogic addresses cyber-specific relations and inference. Building on existing accounts of adaptation, feedback and temporal continuity, this article asks how determinate events leave consequences, acquire durability through rec…
Read moreCyberism treats cyberspace as a basic domain of existence and coordinates cyber, physical, social and thinking relations through the cyber-physical-social-thinking (CPST) framework. Cybersophy supplies cognitive, ethical, existential and axiological orientation, while Cyberlogic addresses cyber-specific relations and inference. Building on existing accounts of adaptation, feedback and temporal continuity, this article asks how determinate events leave consequences, acquire durability through recurrence and reconfigure later relational fields. A constrained Whitehead-Deleuze dialogue develops a middle-range ontological model linking local event-genesis to distributed transformation through empirical carriers. The event-field-stabilization model specifies event integration, trace retention, recursive stabilization and field reconfiguration. Across brain-computer interfaces, social-media identity, large language models and digital disconnection, the model clarifies how mediated classifications, subject positions, dependencies and capability attributions become stabilized and contested. Its social-theoretical intervention is deliberately bounded: process ontology explains temporal formation and persistence without treating change as intrinsically desirable or ontology alone as sufficient for governance or justice.
