When studying the Yijing, it is crucial to recognize that historical concerns and contemporary interpretations often diverge, reflecting differing interests. In the twenty-first century, we navigate a globalized world characterized by rapid technological advancements and cultural shifts, resonating with Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy and Zygmunt Bauman’s concept of “liquid modernity.” Both frameworks highlight the fluidity of identity and relationships amid uncertainty, explaining w…
Read moreWhen studying the Yijing, it is crucial to recognize that historical concerns and contemporary interpretations often diverge, reflecting differing interests. In the twenty-first century, we navigate a globalized world characterized by rapid technological advancements and cultural shifts, resonating with Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy and Zygmunt Bauman’s concept of “liquid modernity.” Both frameworks highlight the fluidity of identity and relationships amid uncertainty, explaining why Western scholarship on the Yijing frequently focuses on change. However, the philosophical discourse on moral metaphysics and self-cultivation has historically captivated Chinese thinkers more than any other topics, a focus less prevalent in Western academia. The Yijing emphasizes the fluidity of existence while acknowledging enduring human qualities that reflect the virtues of heaven and earth. Similarly, Huayan Buddhism explores the interconnectedness of phenomena through dependent origination, suggesting that all experiences arise in relation to one another. Grasping the nonsubstantial nature of conditioned phenomena, along with the enduring qualities of human nature, enables sentient beings to attain enlightenment and liberate themselves from suffering. This chapter examines the philosophical parallels between the Yijing and Huayan Buddhism, emphasizing their shared focus on transformation and liberation, while also addressing distinct notions of innate capacities within human nature. Furthermore, it distinguishes between change—dynamic adaptation to uncertainty—and impermanence, which highlights existence's transient nature. This comparative analysis deepens our understanding of how ancient philosophies can inform contemporary challenges, urging us to recognize the interplay of change and constancy as fundamental aspects of human existence.