Eindhoven University of Technology
Department of Philosophy and Ethics

Philip J. Nickel, Disruptive Innovation and Moral Uncertainty

Matthew Dennis, Lily Frank, Arthur Bran Herbener, Michał Klincewicz, Malene Flensborg Damholdt, Anna Puzio, Katherine Bassil, Jessica Stone, Philip Schneidenbach, Shriya Das, Eleanor Thomas, and Mat Rawsthorne, Reconceptualizing The Ethical Guidelines for Mental Health Apps: Values From Feminism, Disability Studies, and Intercultural Ethics

Bartosz Michal Radomski, Dunja Šešelja, and N. Kim, Rethinking the History of Peptic Ulcer Disease and its Relevance for Network Epistemology

Martin Justin, Dunja Šešelja, Christian Straßer, and Borut Trpin, The Mix Matters: Exploring the Interplay Between Epistemic and Zetetic Norms in Scientific Disagreement

Matteo Michelini, Javier Osorio, Wybo Houkes, Dunja Šešelja, and Christian Straßer, Scientific disagreements and the diagnosticity of evidence: how too much data may lead to polarization

Emily Sullivan and Philippe Verreault-Julien, From Explanation to Recommendation: Ethical Standards for Algorithmic Recourse

Will Fleisher, Daniel C. Friedman, and Dunja Šešelja, Expert Judgment: Overlooked Epistemic Reasons

Philip J. Nickel, A Pluralistic Model of Technology-Driven Value Change

Philip J. Nickel, Transparency and trust in behaviour change technologies

Jeroen Hopster, Chirag Arora, Charlie Blunden, Cecilie Eriksen, Lily Frank, Julia Simone Hermann, Michael Klenk, Elizabeth O'Neill, and Steffen Steinert, Pistols, pills, pork and ploughs: the structure of technomoral revolutions

Bart A. Kamphorst and Elizabeth O'Neill, Digital recording and the hazards of unbounded moralized judgment

Louise Dupuis de Tarlé, Matteo Michelini, Dunja Šešelja, and Christian Straßer, Argumentative Agent-Based Models

Philippe Verreault-Julien and Till Grüne-Yanoff, Understanding and how-possibly explanations: Why can’t they be friends?

Janna Van Grunsven, Naomi Jacobs, Bart A. Kamphorst, Michaela Honauer, Bouke van Balen, Caroline Bollen, Matthew Dennis, Anna Puzio, and M. Birna van Riemsdijk, Three Perspectives on Human Vulnerability: Enriching Responsible Computing Design Processes

Matthew Dennis and Peter Königs, The Future of Digital Well-Being (edited book)

Jeroen de Haas and Wybo Houkes, Can’t Software Malfunction?

Philip J. Nickel, The prospect of artificial-intelligence supported ethics review

Philip J. Nickel, Iris Loosman, Lily Frank, and Anna Vinnikova, Digital health empowerment, autonomy, and the capability approach: reply to de Proost and Grey

Phyllis Illari, Federica Russo, Dunja Šešelja, and Mathias Frisch, Inclusive editing: a collegial approach to academic knowledge making

Louise Dupuis de Tarlé, Matteo Michelini, AnneMarie Borg, Gabriella Pigozzi, Rouchier Juliette, Christian Straßer, and Dunja Šešelja, An Agent-Based Model of MySide Bias in Scientific Debates

Rene Von Schomberg, Carl Mitcham, Sabina Leonelli, Lukas Fuchs, Alfred Nordmann, and Monica Edwards-Schachter, Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science? Merton Revisited and the Prospects of Institutionalizing the Research Values of Openness and Mutual Responsiveness

Wybo Houkes, Progress in Application-Oriented Research

Philip J. Nickel, Iris Loosman, Lily Frank, and Anna Vinnikova, Justice and empowerment through digital health: ethical challenges and opportunities

Joel Katzav, Dorothy Rogers, and Krist Vaesen, American women philosophers: institutions, background and thought

Elizabeth O'Neill, Digital wormholes

Elizabeth O’Neill, A Normativity Wager for Skeptics

Elizabeth O'Neill, Balancing Caution and the Need for Change: The General Contextual Integrity Approach

Gunter Bombaerts, Joel Anderson, Matthew Dennis, Alessio Gerola, Lily Frank, Tom Hannes, Jeroen Hopster, Lavinia Marin, and Andreas Spahn, Attention as Practice: Buddhist Ethics Responses to Persuasive Technologies

Lily Frank, Julia Simone Hermann, Ilona Kavege, and Anna Puzio, Ectogestative Technology and the Beginning of Life

Will Fleisher and Dunja Šešelja, Responsibility for Collective Epistemic Harms