• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition

University of Iceland
Department of Philosophy

Follow
News Feed

Department Affiliates

  • 12
    Regular faculty
  • 5
    Other faculty
  • Retired faculty
  • 18
    Graduate students
  • 8
    Undergraduates
  • 1
    Alumni
  • 1
    Other

Department Activity

  •  News and Updates
  •  Publications
 More details

Details

Also at University of Iceland

  • All departments
  • Other departments

Department Affiliates

  • 12
    Regular faculty
  • 5
    Other faculty
  • Retired faculty
  • 18
    Graduate students
  • 8
    Undergraduates
  • 1
    Alumni
  • 1
    Other

Department Activity

  •  News and Updates
  •  Publications

Also at University of Iceland

  • All departments
  • Other departments

  • Ole Martin Sandberg, Creative Holobionts
    Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 34 (69). 2025.
    Photo of Ole Martin Sandberg
  • Oscar Westerblad and Henk W. de Regt, Scientific Understanding Beyond Representing: Lessons from Ian Hacking’s Work
    The Monist 108 (4). 2025.
    Photo of Oscar Westerblad Photo of Henk W. de Regt
  • Eyja M. J. Brynjarsdóttir, Marriage, Money, and Women’s Independence in the Modern Era
    In Joseph J. Tinguely (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Money: Volume 2: Modern Thought, Springer Verlag. pp. 127-140. 2024.
    Photo of Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir
  • Lenart Škof, S. Sashinungla, and Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir, Elemental-Embodied Thinking for a New Era (edited book)
    Springer Verlag. 2024.
    Photo of Lenart Škof Photo of Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir
  • Finnur Dellsén, Interthematic Polarization
    American Philosophical Quarterly 61 (1): 45-58. 2024.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Finnur Dellsén, Disagreement and Consensus in Science
    In Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter & Rach Cosker-Rowland (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement, Routledge. 2024.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Finnur Dellsén, Probabilifying reflective equilibrium
    Synthese 203 (2): 1-24. 2024.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Finnur Dellsén, Expanding the Empirical Realm: Constructive Empiricism and Augmented Observation
    In Claus Beisbart & Michael Frauchiger (eds.), Scientific Theories and Philosophical Stances: Themes from van Fraassen, De Gruyter. pp. 127-146. 2024.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Finnur Dellsén, Tina Firing, Insa Lawler, and James Norton, What is philosophical progress?
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2 663-693. 2024.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén Photo of Tina Firing Photo of Insa Lawler Photo of James Norton
  • Finnur Dellsén, Abductive Reasoning in Science
    Cambridge University Press. 2024.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Peter Vickers, Ludovica Adamo, Mark Alfano, Cory J. Clark, Eleonora Cresto, He Cui, Haixin Dang, Finnur Dellsén, Nathalie Dupin, Laura Gradowski, Simon Graf, Aline Guevara, Mark Hallap, Jesse Hamilton, Mariann Hardey, Paula Helm, Asheley Landrum, Neil Levy, Edouard Machery, Sarah Mills, Seán M. Muller, Joanne Sheppard, Shinod N. K., Matthew Slater, Jacob Stegenga, Henning Strandin, Michael T. Stuart, David Sweet, Ufuk Tasdan, Henry Taylor, Owen Towler, Dana Tulodziecki, Heidi Tworek, Rebecca Wallbank, Harald A. Wiltsche, and Samantha Mitchell Finnigan, Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
    PLoS ONE 19 (12): 1-24. 2024.
    Photo of Matthew Slater Photo of Finnur Dellsén Photo of Peter Vickers Photo of Simon Graf Photo of Neil Levy
    +19
  • Ásgeir Berg, Was Wittgenstein a radical conventionalist?
    Synthese 203 (2): 1-31. 2024.
    Photo of Ásgeir Berg
  • Ásgeir Berg, Wittgenstein on mathematical facts
    Philosophical Investigations 47 (4): 501-522. 2024.
    Photo of Ásgeir Berg
  • Ole Martin Sandberg, Focusing on emotions in climate education: A felt sense of the climate
    In Donata Schoeller, Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir & Greg Walkerden (eds.), Practicing Embodied Thinking in Research and Learning, Routledge. pp. 165-174. 2024.
    Photo of Ole Martin Sandberg
  • Ole Martin Sandberg, The Gravity of Our Situation: On Acrophobia and Eco-Paralysis
    In Lenart Škof, S. Sashinungla & Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir (eds.), Elemental-Embodied Thinking for a New Era, Springer Verlag. pp. 119-134. 2024.
    Photo of Ole Martin Sandberg
  • Nicholas Emmerson, Plumbing metaphysical explanatory depth
    Philosophical Studies 181 (9): 2091-2112. 2024.
    Photo of Nicholas Emmerson
  • Nicholas Emmerson, Empiricism bad, knowledge good, understanding better?: Alexander Bird: Knowing science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, 304 pp, £78 HB (review)
    Metascience 33 (3). 2024.
    Photo of Nicholas Emmerson
  • Oscar Westerblad, Deweyan conceptual engineering: reconstruction, concepts, and philosophical inquiry
    Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (3): 985-1008. 2024.
    Photo of Oscar Westerblad
  • Oscar Westerblad, Review of Michela Massimi and Casey D. McCoy’s Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects - Michela Massimi and Casey D. McCoy, Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects. New York: Routledge (2020), 210 pp. $136 (hardcover) (review)
    Philosophy of Science 91 (1): 253-257. 2024.
    Photo of Oscar Westerblad
  • Finnur Dellsén, Insa Lawler, and James Norton, Would Disagreement Undermine Progress?
    Journal of Philosophy 120 (3): 139-172. 2023.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén Photo of Insa Lawler Photo of James Norton
  • Finnur Dellsén, Excessive testimony: When less is more
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 107 (2): 525-540. 2023.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Ole Martin Sandberg, Missing the Felt Sense: When Correct Political Arguments Go Wrong
    In Eric R. Severson & Kevin C. Krycka (eds.), The psychology and philosophy of Eugene Gendlin: making sense of contemporary experience, Routledge. 2023.
    Photo of Ole Martin Sandberg
  • Ole Martin Sandberg, ‘Everything Changes in Nature’: Kropotkin’s Process Philosophy
    Anarchist Studies 2023 (2): 16-33. 2023.
    Photo of Ole Martin Sandberg
  • Nicholas Emmerson, A Defence of Manipulationist Noncausal Explanation: The Case for Intervention Liberalism
    Erkenntnis 88 (8): 3179-3201. 2023.
    Photo of Nicholas Emmerson
  • Nicholas Emmerson, Putting explanation first: progress in science and philosophy
    Dissertation, University of Birmingham. 2023.
    Photo of Nicholas Emmerson
  • Oscar Westerblad, Making Sense of Understanding: A Pragmatist Account of Scientific Understanding
    Dissertation, University of Cambridge. 2023.
    Photo of Oscar Westerblad
  • Finnur Dellsén, Insa Lawler, and James Norton, Thinking about Progress: From Science to Philosophy
    Noûs 56 (4): 814-840. 2022.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén Photo of Insa Lawler Photo of James Norton
  • Finnur Dellsén, Scientific Progress Without Justification
    In Insa Lawler, Kareem Khalifa & Elay Shech (eds.), Scientific Understanding and Representation: Modeling in the Physical Sciences, Routledge. 2022.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Finnur Dellsén, Scientific Progress: By-Whom or For-Whom?
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 97 (C): 20-28. 2022.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Finnur Dellsén, The Noetic Approach: Scientific Progress as Enabling Understanding
    In Yafeng Shan (ed.), New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, Routledge. pp. 62-81. 2022.
    Photo of Finnur Dellsén
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next

Details

PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback