-
Finnur Dellsén, Expanding the Empirical Realm: Constructive Empiricism and Augmented ObservationIn Michael Frauchiger (ed.), Themes from van Fraassen (Lauener Library of Analytical Philosophy), De Gruyter. forthcoming.
-
Finnur Dellsén, An Epistemic Advantage of Accommodation over PredictionPhilosophers' Imprint. forthcoming.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Scientific Progress Without JustificationIn Kareem Khalifa, Insa Lawler & Elay Shech (eds.), Scientific Understanding and Representation: Modeling in the Physical Sciences, Routledge. forthcoming.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Scientific Progress without Problems: A Reply to McCoyIn Insa Lawler, Kareem Khalifa & Elay Shech (eds.), Scientific Understanding and Representation: Modeling in the Physical Sciences, Routledge. forthcoming.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Disagreement and Consensus in ScienceIn Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter & Rach Cosker-Rowland (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disagreement, Routledge. forthcoming.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Tina Firing, Insa Lawler, and James Norton, What Is Philosophical Progress?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. forthcoming.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Expanding the Empirical Realm: Constructive Empiricism and Augmented ObservationIn Claus Beisbart & Michael Frauchiger (eds.), Scientific Theories and Philosophical Stances: Themes from van Fraassen, De Gruyter. pp. 127-146. 2024.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Insa Lawler, and James Norton, Would Disagreement Undermine Progress?Journal of Philosophy 120 (3): 139-172. 2023.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Excessive testimony: When less is morePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 107 (2): 525-540. 2023.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Insa Lawler, and James Norton, Thinking about Progress: From Science to PhilosophyNoûs 56 (4): 814-840. 2022.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Scientific Progress: By-Whom or For-Whom?Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 97 (C): 20-28. 2022.
-
Finnur Dellsén, The Noetic Approach: Scientific Progress as Enabling UnderstandingIn Yafeng Shan (ed.), New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, Routledge. pp. 62-81. 2022.
-
Ásgeir Berg, Rules as constitutive practices defined by correlated equilibriaInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65. 2022.
-
Finnur Dellsén, We Owe It to Others to Think for OurselvesIn Jonathan Matheson & Kirk Lougheed (eds.), Epistemic Autonomy, Routledge. 2021.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Understanding scientific progress: the noetic accountSynthese 199 (3-4): 11249-11278. 2021.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Consensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2021.
-
Finnur Dellsén, The epistemic impact of theorizing: generation bias implies evaluation biasPhilosophical Studies 177 (12): 3661-3678. 2020.
-
James R. Beebe and Finnur Dellsén, Scientific Realism in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Seven Sciences and History and Philosophy of SciencePhilosophy of Science 87 (2): 336-364. 2020.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Explanatory Consolidation: From ‘Best’ to ‘Good Enough’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (1): 157-177. 2020.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Að treysta sérfræðingum [English: "Trusting Experts: What, When, and Why?"]Ritið 20 (3): 235-258. 2020.
-
Finnur Dellsén and Maria Baghramian, Disagreement in science: introduction to the special issueSynthese 198 (S25): 6011-6021. 2020.
-
Ásgeir Berg, Contradictions and falling bridges: what was Wittgenstein’s reply to Turing?British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (3). 2020.
-
Nathaniel Sharadin and Finnur Dellsén, Promotion as contrastive increase in expected fitPhilosophical Studies 176 (5): 1263-1290. 2019.
-
James R. Beebe, Maria Baghramian, Luke Drury, and Finnur Dellsén, Divergent Perspectives on Expert Disagreement: Preliminary Evidence from Climate Science, Climate Policy, Astrophysics, and Public OpinionEnvironmental Communication 13 35-50. 2019.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Rational understanding: toward a probabilistic epistemology of acceptabilitySynthese 198 (3): 2475-2494. 2019.