Angelito Malicse

Introduction The Spanish colonization of the Philippines from 1565 to 1898 introduced a unique form of governance characterized by the fusion of ecclesiastical and colonial powers. Although the Spanish Crown was the official source of authority, the Roman Catholic Church—particularly through its religious orders—played a pivotal role in administering colonial society. This paper explores the role of the Catholic Church in governance during Spanish colonization, the socio-political influence of the clergy, key events such as the execution of Gomburza, and the eventual backlash during the Philippine Revolution, including the imprisonment of friars under Emilio Aguinaldo’s revolutionary government.

Abstract Political leadership across nations often fails to address the root causes of systemic societal problems such as corruption, inequality, environmental degradation, and authoritarianism. This paper introduces a corrective framework grounded in the "Three Universal Formula" developed by the author. The formula, derived from fundamental laws of nature and systems thinking, aims to address the inherent flaws in political leadership through a new paradigm rooted in moral accountability, feedback systems, and balance. Through case studies, real-world analogies, and philosophical grounding, this paper provides a practical and theoretical basis for the transformation of governance structures.

Iran’s transformation from a Sunni-majority region into the epicenter of Twelver Shia Islam—and the subsequent overthrow of its monarch by a Shiite-led revolution in 1979—reflect two of the most pivotal developments in the history of the Islamic world. These events, separated by nearly five centuries, demonstrate the dynamic interplay of religious doctrine, political ambition, and popular sentiment in shaping national identity. This paper explores how the Safavid dynasty institutionalized Twelver Shiism in the 16th century and how Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolutionary leadership replaced a Western-backed monarchy with an Islamic theocracy in the 20th century.

Abstract This paper explores whether the invention of religion is a product of human biological evolution, and how it connects with Angelito Malicse’s Universal Formula. It examines the scientific, spiritual, and philosophical perspectives on the origin and role of religion, and interprets these through the lens of the Universal Formula, which incorporates natural laws such as the law of karma, the feedback mechanism of conscious minds, and the law of balance in nature. The findings suggest that religion emerged as both a byproduct of evolved cognitive functions and a cultural system designed to maintain societal harmony. When aligned with natural law, religion contributes positively to human development. When misaligned, it leads to societal dysfunction.

Abstract This paper explores the historical and theological foundations of the hijab and modest dress code for women during the time of the Prophet Muhammad. Drawing on the Qur'an, Hadith literature, and scholarly interpretations, it demonstrates that while the Prophet consistently advocated modesty in dress and behavior for both men and women, his approach was compassionate and educative rather than coercive. The concept of hijab, originally meaning barrier or partition, evolved into a broader cultural and religious practice that included the headscarf and other modest attire. The paper concludes that the Prophet’s teachings promoted modesty as a personal spiritual commitment rather than a strictly enforced legal code.

Abstract This paper explores the fundamental reasons why individuals may achieve billionaire status at a young age while rarely, if ever, attaining recognition as true philosophers at the same stage of life. By comparing the nature of wealth accumulation with the development of philosophical insight, the paper argues that while wealth can result from technical skill and circumstantial advantage, philosophical maturity is inherently tied to lived experience, reflection, and existential struggle. This analysis draws on historical examples, psychological studies, and philosophical texts.

In many societies, religion plays a significant role in shaping personal, cultural, and social identity. As individuals grow and experience new ideas, it is not uncommon for their belief systems to evolve. Some may become more secular in their thinking while continuing to maintain their born religion externally. In such situations, keeping quiet about one’s internal shift in belief can often be the most practical and respectful choice. This paper explores the reasons why remaining silent about secular beliefs, while maintaining a religious appearance, can be beneficial.

Abstract This paper explores the deep relationship between Kurt Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems and the Universal Formula of Nature composed of three interdependent laws: the Law of Karma, the Law of Feedback Mechanism, and the Law of Balance in Nature. These laws provide a natural, systems-based interpretation of logical limitations and human decision-making. By framing Gödel’s theorems within these universal laws, we gain insights into the fundamental constraints of formal systems and the necessity of external feedback for achieving intellectual and existential balance.

Abstract: The Israel–Palestine conflict remains one of the most intractable and emotionally charged disputes in modern history. This paper examines the key flaws in leadership on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides, analyzes shared challenges that have prolonged the conflict, and offers balanced recommendations supported by international norms and conflict resolution theory. Drawing on insights from political science, international law, and human rights reports, the goal is to highlight opportunities for a durable and just peace.

Abstract This paper explores the concept of a self-referential cognitive universe as a framework for understanding and applying a universal formula for solving the problem of free will. Drawing from the foundational ideas of Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, Douglas Hofstadter’s theory of strange loops, and Christopher Langan’s Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU), the paper integrates these with the author’s three universal laws of nature. It posits that a recursive, self-aware cosmos offers the most coherent explanation for the role of consciousness in shaping reality and decision-making processes. The universal formula is presented as a practical, natural law-based solution that aligns with this cognitive structure of the universe.

Abstract This paper explores the philosophical and practical implications of Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. While these theorems originate in formal mathematical logic, their consequences extend far beyond, illuminating limits in systems of thought, governance, artificial intelligence, and self-awareness. Using a set of real-world examples, this paper demonstrates how Gödel’s insights continue to influence fields as diverse as psychology, law, religion, and computational theory. By grounding these abstract concepts in everyday systems, we aim to reveal how Gödel's work illustrates fundamental truths about the nature of knowledge and the boundaries of reasoning.

Abstract Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems have long been interpreted as a profound demonstration of the inherent limitations of formal mathematical systems. However, when viewed through the lens of a natural law-based universal formula—which includes the law of balance, the law of cause and effect (karma), and the requirement of defect-free systems—these limitations take on a broader and more integrative meaning. This paper explores the compatibility and reinforcement between Gödel's theorems and the universal formula developed by Angelito Malicse, showing that rather than contradicting each other, the two frameworks converge to affirm the boundaries of closed systems and the necessity of open, feedback-based natural integration.

Abstract Prophet Muhammad’s vision was to restore and unify the monotheistic faith rooted in the traditions of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus. However, the Islamic world today reflects a wide range of sectarian divisions. This paper explores the reasons for this divergence, tracing historical, political, and theological developments within Islam, and comparing them to similar patterns within Judaism and Christianity. It also examines contemporary efforts aimed at fostering unity within Islam and among the broader Abrahamic traditions.

Abstract This paper explores the leadership crisis that emerged immediately following the death of Prophet Muhammad in 632 CE, highlighting the key individuals involved and the resulting division within the Muslim ummah. While Prophet Muhammad did not appoint a clear political successor before his death, various companions took differing actions and positions that ultimately gave rise to two major Islamic branches: Sunni and Shia Islam. The paper outlines the roles of prominent figures such as Abu Bakr, Umar ibn al-Khattab, Ali ibn Abi Talib, and the Ansar of Medina, and examines the events at Saqifah and their long-term implications.

Abstract This paper examines why consciousness and intelligence emerge and evolve within the greater context of natural systems governed by energy and force. Through the lens of the three universal laws of nature—Karma (systemic cause and effect), Balance (dynamic equilibrium), and Feedback (mutual influence and learning)—the paper explains that consciousness is not an anomaly but a necessity. As nature becomes more complex, consciousness and intelligence emerge as tools for internal regulation, error correction, and adaptive evolution. These traits enable systems to maintain harmony and sustainability across ecological, social, and internal domains.

Abstract This paper explores the evolutionary origins and advantages of sexual reproduction in biological organisms. While traditionally explained by genetic and ecological mechanisms, this study also integrates the three universal formula—as proposed by Angelito Malicse—as a deeper framework to understand why sexual activity emerged in the evolutionary process. The formula includes: (1) the Law of Karma (Cause and Effect + Systems Thinking), (2) the Law of Feedback Mechanisms in Nature, and (3) the Law of Balance in Nature. These principles offer a universal lens that supports the biological, philosophical, and systemic interpretation of sexual evolution.

Abstract This paper presents a theoretical model of life after death grounded in the Universal Formula developed by Angelito Malicse. This formula consists of three core principles: the Law of Karma (systemic cause and effect), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Feedback Mechanism between conscious minds and their environments. Using these natural laws, the paper proposes three possible pathways for the continuation of consciousness after physical death: (1) spiritual or energetic reintegration, (2) digital preservation through artificial general intelligence (AGI), and (3) consciousness transfer to new biological or synthetic systems. The framework avoids religious dogma and speculative metaphysics by applying a systems-based interpretation of consciousness, information continuity, and natural equilibrium.

Abstract This paper argues that for any government system to be effective, sustainable, and just, it must follow the three universal laws of nature embodied in the universal formula proposed by Angelito Malicse. These laws encompass the principles of cause and effect (karma), natural systemic balance, and free will governed by feedback mechanisms. The paper outlines how these principles align with natural and social systems and how their application in governance can lead to more ethical and sustainable leadership. Historical and theoretical insights support the argument that ignorance or violation of these laws leads to systemic dysfunction, corruption, and societal collapse.

Abstract Religious conflict and sectarian division within Islam are often misattributed to the religion itself. This paper argues that the core teachings of Islam promote unity, justice, and balance, and that misinterpretation by various sects is a result of human error rather than doctrinal flaw. It introduces a universal formula grounded in the laws of nature—particularly the law of balance and cause-effect systems—to explain the source of religious conflict and proposes a holistic educational system as the means of correction. This approach respects individual faiths while correcting defective interpretations that lead to societal imbalance.

Abstract: The Big Bounce theory presents an alternative to the traditional Big Bang cosmology, positing that the universe undergoes cycles of contraction and expansion, thereby avoiding the singularity problem inherent in the standard model. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the Big Bounce model, its theoretical underpinnings, variations such as Loop Quantum Cosmology and ekpyrotic scenarios, and its implications for cosmological observations. The paper also contrasts the Big Bounce with the Big Bang model and addresses the challenges faced by cyclic models, including entropy growth and observational constraints. Finally, it explores how the three universal laws proposed by Angelito Malicse may offer a broader scientific framework for understanding cosmological cycles.

Abstract This paper analyzes the validity of two dominant cosmological theories — Singularity Theory and the Big Bang Theory — in explaining the origin of the universe. The analysis is conducted using a foundational framework of three proposed universal laws of nature: the Law of Karma (Cause and Effect / System Logic), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanism. The results demonstrate that Singularity Theory violates all three natural laws and is therefore an invalid explanation of cosmic origins. In contrast, the Big Bang Theory aligns with all three laws, suggesting it is a potentially valid and scientifically consistent origin model. Additionally, this paper introduces a logically consistent pre-Big Bang scenario derived from these universal laws, offering insight into the possible state of existence before cosmic expansion began.

Introduction The conflict over the right of return remains a core obstacle to peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Jews view their return to Israel as a realization of historic and moral justice after centuries of exile and persecution. Palestinians see their right of return as essential to rectifying the injustices of the 1948 Nakba. A durable solution must go beyond one-sided claims to create a future where both peoples can live with dignity, security, and self-determination. This paper proposes a four-pillar framework to resolve the right of return issue through a combination of historical recognition, limited return, compensation and restitution, and parallel statehood with safeguards.

Introduction The question of the "right of return" to the land known historically as Israel or Palestine is one of the most complex and emotionally charged issues in international politics. It touches on ancient history, religious belief, international law, human rights, and the lived experiences of both Jews and Palestinians. This paper examines the basis for the Jewish claim to return to their ancestral homeland, the counterclaim by Palestinians displaced in the 20th century, and the broader international debate over balancing these competing rights.