• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Francois Recanati

Institut Jean Nicod
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    223
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    34
  •  News and Updates
    195

 More details
  • Institut Jean Nicod
    Department of Philosophy- CNRS
    Regular Faculty
  • All publications (223)
  •  15
    La signalisation du discours
    Larousse. 1982.
  • Qu'est-ce qu'un acte locutionnaire?
    Communications 32 190-215. 1980.
  •  105
    Anti-Descriptivism, Mental Files, And The Communication Of Singular Thoughts
    Manuscrito 32 (1): 7-32. 2009.
    In this paper, I argue that singular thought about an object involves nondescriptive or de re ways of thinking of that object, that is, modes of presentation resting on contextual relations of ‘acquaintance’ to the object. Such modes of presentation I analyse as mental files in which the subject can store information gained through the acquaintance relations in question. I show that the mental -file approach provides a solution to a vexing problem regarding the communication of singular thoughts…Read more
    In this paper, I argue that singular thought about an object involves nondescriptive or de re ways of thinking of that object, that is, modes of presentation resting on contextual relations of ‘acquaintance’ to the object. Such modes of presentation I analyse as mental files in which the subject can store information gained through the acquaintance relations in question. I show that the mental -file approach provides a solution to a vexing problem regarding the communication of singular thoughts: If singular thoughts depend upon contextual relations to the objects of thought, how can they be communicated across contexts? What makes communication possible when the speaker and the addressee do not stand in the same contextual relations to the objects the speaker’s thought is about?
    Singular PropositionsRussellian and Direct Reference Theories, MiscDescriptive Theories of ReferenceRead more
    Singular PropositionsRussellian and Direct Reference Theories, MiscDescriptive Theories of ReferenceLinguistic CommunicationMental Files
  •  1075
    The Fodorian fallacy
    Analysis 62 (4): 285-89. 2002.
    In recent years Fodor has repeatedly argued that nothing epistemic can be essential to, or constitutive of, any concept. This holds in virtue of a constraint which Fodor dubs the Compositionality Constraint. I show that Fodor's argument is fallacious because it rests on an ambiguity.
    Atomist Theories of ConceptsCompositionalityConcept PossessionThe Language of Thought
  •  2
    La philosophie analytique est-elle dépassée? Note sur la philosophie "post-analytique"
    Philosophie 35 77-86. 1992.
    French Philosophy
  • Performatifs et délocutifs: à propos du verbe 's'excuser'
    Semantikos 2 69-87. 1978.
  •  20
    Descriptions and Situations
    In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and beyond, Oxford University Press. pp. 15-40. 2004.
    forthcoming.
    Situation SemanticsAttributive and Referential Uses of DescriptionsIncompleteness of DescriptionsInd…Read more
    Situation SemanticsAttributive and Referential Uses of DescriptionsIncompleteness of DescriptionsIndeterminacy, MiscVariables
  •  100
    Varieties of Simulation
    In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action, John Benjamins. pp. 151-171. 2002.
    The Simulation TheoryImagination and PretenseAttitude Ascriptions, Misc
  •  6
    La conjecture de Ducrot, vingt ans après
    In Marion Carel (ed.), Les Facettes du dire : hommage à Oswald Ducrot, Kime. pp. 269-281. 2002.
    Réponse aux objections soulevées par Oswald Ducrot à l'encontre de mon approche "gricéenne" de la performativité.
    PerformativesSpeech Acts
  •  147
    Predelli and García-Carpintero on Literal Meaning
    Critica 38 (112): 69-79. 2006.
    Este texto da respuesta a los que, en este mismo número, Predelli y García-Carpintero dedican a mi libro Literal Meaning. En la primera sección hago un breve resumen de esta obra; en la segunda respondo a los comentarios críticos de Predelli y en la tercera a los de García-Carpintero.
    Context and Context-Dependence, MiscSemantics-Pragmatics DistinctionNonliteral Meaning
  •  49
    Commentary on Daniel Morgan, 'A Demonstrative Model of First-Person Thought'
    This response was written for the Vth Online Consciousness Conference.
  •  51
    Reply to Gauker
    Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 32 (2): 81-84. 2013.
    Response to Gauker's paper in the Symposium on *Truth-Conditional Pragmatics* (OUP 2010).
    The Role of Language in ThoughtLinguistic CommunicationSemantics-Pragmatics DistinctionContext and C…Read more
    The Role of Language in ThoughtLinguistic CommunicationSemantics-Pragmatics DistinctionContext and Context-Dependence, Misc
  •  1
    Il problema della delimitazione fra semantica e pragmatica
    Quaderni di Semantica 1 197-234. 1980.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback