-
130A Routley–Meyer Semantics for Gödel 3-Valued Logic and Its Paraconsistent CounterpartLogica Universalis 7 (4): 507-532. 2013.Routley–Meyer semantics (RM-semantics) is defined for Gödel 3-valued logic G3 and some logics related to it among which a paraconsistent one differing only from G3 in the interpretation of negation is to be remarked. The logics are defined in the Hilbert-style way and also by means of proof-theoretical and semantical consequence relations. The RM-semantics is defined upon the models for Routley and Meyer’s basic positive logic B+, the weakest positive RM-semantics. In this way, it is to be expec…Read more
-
167A constructive negation for logics including TW+Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 15 (4): 389-404. 2005.The logic TW+ is positive Ticket Entailment without the contraction axiom. Constructive negation is understood in the (minimal) intuitionistic sense but without paradoxes of relevance. It is shown how to introduce a constructive negation of this kind in positive logics at least as strong as TW+. Special attention is paid to the reductio axioms. Concluding remarks about relevance, modal and entailment logics are stated. Complete relational ternary semantics are provided for the logics introduced …Read more
-
1The non-involutive Routley star: relevant logics without weak double negationTeorema: International Journal of Philosophy 29 (3): 103-116. 2010.
-
149The basic constructive logic for a weak sense of consistencyJournal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (1): 89-107. 2008.In this paper, consistency is understood as the absence of the negation of a theorem, and not, in general, as the absence of any contradiction. We define the basic constructive logic BKc1 adequate to this sense of consistency in the ternary relational semantics without a set of designated points. Then we show how to define a series of logics extending BKc1 within the spectrum delimited by contractionless minimal intuitionistic logic. All logics defined in the paper are paraconsistent logics.
-
Relevance Logics, Paradoxes Of Consistency And The K Rule IiLogic and Logical Philosophy 15 175-191. 2006.The logic B+ is Routley and Meyer’s basic positive logic. Wedefine the logics BK+ and BK′+ by adding to B+ the K rule and to BK+the characteristic S4 axiom, respectively. These logics are endowed witha relatively strong non-constructive negation. We prove that all the logicsdefined lack the K axiom and the standard paradoxes of consistency
Gemma Robles
Universidad de León
-
Universidad de LeónAssociate Professor
León, CL, Spain
Areas of Specialization
| Logic and Philosophy of Logic |
Areas of Interest
| Logic and Philosophy of Logic |