-
27Managing Expectations: Delivering the Worst News in the Best Way?American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1): 1-2. 2018.
-
11The Potential Harms and Benefits from Research on Medical PracticesHastings Center Report 45 (3): 5-6. 2015.A commentary on “SUPPORT and the Ethics of Study Implementation: Lessons for Comparative Effectiveness Research from the Trial of Oxygen Therapy for Premature Babies,” by John D. Lantos and Chris Feudtner, in the January‐February 2015 issue.
-
41Adrift in the gray zone: IRB perspectives on research in the learning health systemAJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (2): 125-134. 2016.
-
12Innocent Fun or “Microslavery”?Hastings Center Report 44 (6): 38-46. 2014.In 2011, Ingmar Riedel‐Kruse's bioengineering laboratory at Stanford University publicized an application that uses paramecia for what the researchers termed “biotic games.” These games make use of living organisms, computer programs, and lab equipment to implement games like Pong, Pac‐man, and soccer. Gamesand related activities are often considered nonserious or trivial, whereas life, biological systems, and science are treated very seriously in moral analysis and public perception. The manipu…Read more
-
3Politics and Peer reviewAmerican Journal of Bioethics 4 (1). 2004.This Article does not have an abstract
-
10Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics ConsultationAmerican Journal of Bioethics 16 (3): 1-2. 2016.
-
18CPR and Ventricular Assist Devices: The Challenge of Prolonging Life Without Guaranteeing HealthAmerican Journal of Bioethics 17 (2): 1-2. 2017.
-
39Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in ResearchAmerican Journal of Bioethics 13 (4). 2013.(2013). Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in Research. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.778645
-
28A new era for AJOBAmerican Journal of Bioethics 4 (3). 2004.This Article does not have an abstract
-
67Federalism and bioethics: States and moral pluralismHastings Center Report 37 (6): 24-35. 2007.Bioethicists are often interested mostly in national standards and institutions, but state governments have historically overseen a wide range of bioethical issues and share responsibility with the federal government for still others. States ought to have an important role. By allowing for multiple outcomes, the American federal system allows a better fit between public opinion and public policies.
-
35Can the Dead Donor Rule be Resuscitated?American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8): 1-1. 2011.The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 8, Page 1, August 2011
-
16Blood, sweat and tearsAmerican Journal of Bioethics 6 (3). 2006.This Article does not have an abstract
-
58Translating Stem Cell Research: Challenges at the Research FrontierJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2): 267-276. 2010.There are many kinds of clinical trials. The regulatory framework within which most drug development takes place appears to be the one that is to be applied to the development of novel stem cell-based clinical trials. In the standard drug development model, appropriate pre-clinical research is conducted, and investigators or research sponsors submit an investigational new drug application to the Food and Drug Administration.If approved, typical clinical trials start with Phase I, which is usuall…Read more
-
10The History of The American Journal of BioethicsAmerican Journal of Bioethics 10 (10): 3-3. 2010.This Article does not have an abstract
-
59Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultationAmerican Journal of Bioethics 8 (3). 2008.Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for co…Read more
-
36Clinical Ethics Consultation: A Need for EvidenceAmerican Journal of Bioethics 15 (1): 1-2. 2015.
-
21Duty-Free: The Non-Obligatory Nature of Preimplantation Genetic DiagnosisAmerican Journal of Bioethics 12 (4): 1-2. 2012.The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 4, Page 1-2, April 2012
-
16AJOB 2.0: Taking Bioethics to a New LevelAmerican Journal of Bioethics 14 (8): 1-2. 2014.No abstract
-
45Theory, practice, and epistemology in the development of species conceptsStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4): 521-545. 1996.
-
48States and Moral PluralismHastings Center Report 37 (6): 24. 2007.Bioethicists are often interested mostly in national standards and institutions, but state governments have historically overseen a wide range of bioethical issues and share responsibility with the federal government for still others. States ought to have an important role. By allowing for multiple outcomes, the American federal system allows a better fit between public opinion and public policies.
Stanford, California, United States of America