-
118Prioridad ontológica y prioridad lógica en la doctrina aristotélica de la sustanciaPhilosophica 13 175-198. 1990.
-
Orden espacial y orden temporal Segun aristoteles (fĺs, IV 11, 219 a 10-21)Méthexis 3 (1): 65-83. 1990.
-
E. Rudolph (ed.). Zeit, Bewegung und Handlung, Studien zur Zeitabhandlung des Aristoteles, Stuttgart 1988 (Klett-Cotta, 230 páginas) (review)Méthexis 3 (1): 143-145. 1990.
-
E. Rudolph (ed.), Polis und Kosmos. Naturphilosophie und politische Philosophie bei Platon, Darmstadt 1996 (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 145 págs.) (review)Méthexis 11 (1): 160-163. 1998.
-
N. Sherman, Making a Necessity of Virtue. Aristotle and Kant on Virtue, Cambridge 1997 (Cambridge University Press, xvii+387 págs.) (review)Méthexis 11 (1): 169-173. 1998.
-
S. Everson, Aristotle on Perception, Oxford 1997 (Oxford Clarendon Press, X + 309 págs.)Méthexis 12 (1): 149-153. 1999.
-
Prioridad y Proyecto Ontológico En Aristóteles. A Propósito de Una Interpretación RecienteMéthexis 4 (1): 115-127. 1991.
-
Aristóteles y la Lógica Poliv Alente. Acerca de la Reconstrucción de la Asertórica Aristotélica Por Niels ÖffenbergerMéthexis 6 (1): 179-189. 1993.
-
M. Bonelli, Alessandro di Afrodisia e la metafisica come scienza dimostrativa, Napoli 2001 (Bibliopolis, 316 págs.)Méthexis 18 (1): 157-160. 2005.
-
A. Vallejo Campos, Aristóteles, Fragmentos; introducción, traducción y notas, Madrid 2005 (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, Gredos, 502 págs.) (review)Méthexis 19 (1): 199-201. 2006.
-
R. R. Walzer-J. M. Mingay (edd.), Aristotelis Ethica, Eudemia, Oxford 1991 (Oxford University Press, XX + 162 páginas)Méthexis 5 (2): 180-181. 1992.
-
P. Curd, The Legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought, Princeton (N. J.) 1998 (Princeton University Press, xv + 280 págs.) (review)Méthexis 13 (1): 153-156. 2000.
-
M. Riedenauer, Orexis und Eupraxia. Ethikbegrundung im Streben bei Aristoteles, Würzburg 2000 (Königshausen & Neumann, 374 págs.) (review)Méthexis 17 (1): 135-139. 2004.
-
J. J. Cleary, Aristotle and Mathematics. Aporetic Method in Cosmology and Metapysics (con prefacio de H.-G. Gadamer), Leiden 1995 (E. J. Brill, XXIII + 558 págs.) (review)Méthexis 10 (1): 185-188. 1997.
-
J. Szaif, Platons Begriff der Wahrheit, Freiburg-München 1996 (Verlag Karl Alber, 561 págs.)Méthexis 10 (1): 181-183. 1997.
-
Bertrand Dumoulin, Analyse génétique de la Métaphysique d'Aristote, Montréal - Paris 1986 (Bellarmin-Les Belles Lettres, 460 páginas) (review)Méthexis 2 (1): 100-102. 1989.
-
Jean Paul Dumont, Introduction a la méthode d'Aristote Paris 1986 (Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 224 páginas)Méthexis 1 (1): 124-126. 1988.
-
27Reflexion, Gefühl, Identität im Anschluss an Kant: = Reflection, emotion, identity from Kant onwards (edited book)Duncker Und Humblot. 2019.The present collection brings together a number of studies interested in highlighting the role of reflexivity and sentiment in Kant's philosophy. If philosophy is by definition a reflective endeavor, Kant's writings document a particularly powerful philosophical enterprise; not only because he constitutes reflexivity itself into the cornerstone of philosophical method, but also because, in doing so, he unveils fundamental structures of human subjectivity. Authors in this volume have succeeded in…Read more
-
52Platon und Aristoteles – sub ratione veritatis. Festschrift für Wolfgang Wieland zum 70. Geburtstag (edited book)Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 2003.With contributions by John J. Cleary, Gregor Damschen, Rainer Enskat, Francisco J. Gonzalez, Jürgen Mittelstraß and Carlo Natali (all on Plato) as well as by Enrico Berti, Nicolas Braun, Graciela M. Chichi, Wolfgang Kullmann, Helmut Mai, Alejandro G. Vigo, Franco Volpi and Hermann Weidemann (all on Aristotle).
-
24Dialog und Verstehen. Klassische und moderne Perspektiven (edited book)Lit. 2015.Thinking is a kind of dialogue ─ according to Plato thinking is a silent and inner conversation of the soul with itself. Understanding presupposes thinking. Therefore, understanding presupposes a kind of dialogue. From this conclusion arises not only the question of what dialogue and understanding are in essence, but also the question of the connection between dialogue and understanding. This volume explores these two question complexes in both a philosophical-historical and a systematic manner …Read more
-
28This edition of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola’s “De ente et uno” (“On being and the one”) offers for the first time a key text for the reformation of metaphysics in Renaissance philosophy in German translation. The Latin text is added. The detailed introduction and careful commentary reveal the guiding points Pico has set with this work.