This article explores how Indigenous communities of the Brazilian Amazon conceive the relationship between humans and the natural world, contrasting their relational, eco-ethical understanding with the mechanistic view of nature that emerged in early modern Europe. Drawing on ethnographic work among the Yanomami, Tukano, Enawene-Nawe, Wajãpi, and Krahô, we connect early Indigenous critiques of the European drive for accumulation to present-day debates over multispecies agency. Since these Indige…
Read moreThis article explores how Indigenous communities of the Brazilian Amazon conceive the relationship between humans and the natural world, contrasting their relational, eco-ethical understanding with the mechanistic view of nature that emerged in early modern Europe. Drawing on ethnographic work among the Yanomami, Tukano, Enawene-Nawe, Wajãpi, and Krahô, we connect early Indigenous critiques of the European drive for accumulation to present-day debates over multispecies agency. Since these Indigenous ontologies frame plants, animals, and spirits as intentional beings within networks of reciprocity, they reveal a metaphysical continuity between humans and nonhumans, challenging Western assumptions about nature as inert matter. By juxtaposing these perspectives with contemporary reflections—from Eduardo Viveiros de Castro to Davi Kopenawa—we argue that Indigenous eco-ethical knowledge from the Amazon offers an alternative to the exploitative logics driving the current ecological crisis and expands previous concepts of Indigenous relationality. We suggest that the Indigenous Amazonian worldview invites a reimagining of human–nature relations grounded in complex forms of multifaceted relationality.