Kamalani Johnson

_In this first academic symposium on Hawaiʻi Philosophy, Michael David Kaulana Ing proposes using the term Philosophy as a bridge concept—one that enables culturally diverse communities to articulate their own philosophical traditions while engaging in shared dialogue. The dialogue that would ensue would allow them to discuss their shared interests in meaningful ways. Following up on his proposal, Ing develops an understanding of Hawai__ʻ__i Philosophy that includes the emic __ʻ__Ike Hawai__ʻ__i, the etic __Hawaiian Philosophy, __and K__ā__laimana__ʻ__o as a “thought-carving” middle space that enables Kānaka Hawaiʻi alongside others to search for resources far and wide to make meaning of the world we live in. __Highlighting that Hawai__ʻ__i Philosophy can only take place insofar as it is grounded in practice, Kaipulaumakaniolono Keala cautions about Kānaka __Hawaiʻi_ _demarcating the boundaries of a field when the journey has just begun, while Kamalani Johnson __argues that Hawai__ʻ__i philosophy must be rooted in a Kanaka-centered conceptualization of knowledge. Meanwhile, Bruce Ka__ʻ__imi Watson has chosen to remain visibly silent in this global forum for K__ā__naka, offering a loud but quiet withholding. __Tamara Albertini responds to Ing’s call for a distinctly Hawaiian framework of inquiry, which she describes as “philosophical wayfinding.” Writing as a non-Kanaka Maoli philosopher, she accepts this invitation in the spirit of the guest who does not arrive to consume but to tarry, perceive, and contribute with care. In so doing, she draws on her own methodology of bricolage and flânerie—approaches designed to resist the hierarchization and appropriation of philosophical traditions—in order to engage in a reflective exchange that foregrounds Indigenous knowledge systems. She particularly highlights genealogies of thought rooted in Native Hawaiian culture and embraces Ing’s notion of borrowing as a generative and creative contribution to the evolving landscape of World Philosophies. __Celia __Tagamolila_ _Bardwell-Jones argues that Hawai__ʻ__i__ Philosophy practitioners adopt an ethic of hard incommensurability. She encourages __K__ā__naka__ Hawaiʻi not to allow for integration, fusion or facile comparisons with Hawai__ʻ__i__ Philosophy. Sydney Morrow leans on Ing’s understanding of “bounded multiplicity” to develop an understanding of existential poverty afflicting post-contact __K__a__naka__ society. An alleviation of this poverty would require a different policy analysis as compared to standard economic-driven solutions, she holds. In his reply to his co-panelists, Ing reiterates that the practice of __Hawai__ʻ__i Philosophy must be guided by the principles of __positionality, epistemic humility, ho__ʻ__okama__ʻ__ā__ina, etc. and must support the __K__a__naka community for whom __Hawai__ʻ__i is their ancestral home__. _ _ _.