I investigate the mystical female voice that runs through the philosophical-moral reflection of Iris Murdoch. Despite her ambiguous position on feminism, I argue that Murdoch’s philosophical production is crossed by a mystical feminine echo, inherited from Simone WeilSimone Weiland Julian of NorwichJulian of Norwich, which allows the evasion of a limited, rationalist, vision of philosophy, traditionally hostile to many women philosophers. For this purpose, I analyse the strong objections that Mu…
Read moreI investigate the mystical female voice that runs through the philosophical-moral reflection of Iris Murdoch. Despite her ambiguous position on feminism, I argue that Murdoch’s philosophical production is crossed by a mystical feminine echo, inherited from Simone WeilSimone Weiland Julian of NorwichJulian of Norwich, which allows the evasion of a limited, rationalist, vision of philosophy, traditionally hostile to many women philosophers. For this purpose, I analyse the strong objections that Murdoch raises to two apparently distant trains of thought, logical positivismLogical positivismand existentialismExistentialism, due to their same liberal conception of the individual. I show that Murdoch’s criticism of liberal subjectivity is aimed at the affirmation of a more inclusive and realistic anthropologicalAnthropological paradigm, which places emphasis on human reflexivity and emotionality. I consider Murdoch’s redefinition of the human being according to an ethics of vision, a moral pilgrimage from illusion to realityReality, as the expression of the mystical excess of a typically feminine word which overcomes the intellectualistic attitude of Western philosophy. I claim that Murdoch engages in a critical reinterpretation of Simone Weil’s concept of attention and Julian of Norwich’s mystical lexicon of the true existenceExistence of evil and joy in contemplation of reality, in order to fully describe the otherwise ineffable richness of human experience.