-
19Justified Evidence ResistanceActa Analytica 1-12. forthcoming.The paper proposes a novel account of justified evidence resistance. When S inquires as to whether p is the case, S resists available counterevidence e if S either fails to countenance e or is insensitive to e’s probative force. S is justified in resisting available counterevidence e if and only if e is irrelevant.
-
10Triangular ExternalismIn Ernie Lepore & Kurt Ludwig (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Donald Davidson, Blackwell. 2013.Triangular externalism is the view that a subject's thought content is determined by the communication the subject has with others about objects or events in the shared public environment. The process of triangulation is said to constitute thought content. Section 1 characterizes triangular externalism and sets it apart from other forms of content externalism. Section 2 is concerned with the tensions within Davidson's views: the tension between historical externalism and interpretationism, as we…Read more
-
22Greco’s explanatory salience contextualism revisitedSynthese 201 (3): 1-11. 2023.According to Greco’s early explanatory salience contextualism, _S_ knows that _p_ if and only if _S_’s cognitive abilities are the salient factor in a causal explanation of why _S_ holds a true belief rather than a false belief or no belief at all. Greco abandoned this view because it cannot handle fake barn cases and because it proves impossible to analyze knowledge in terms of a quantitative characterization of explanatory salience. The paper argues that the core idea of explanatory salience c…Read more
-
Warum das Gettierproblem kein Scheinproblem istIn Gerhard Ernst & Lisa Marani (eds.), Das Gettierproblem. Eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren, Mentis. 2013.
-
2An Epistemic Defense of News AbstinenceIn Sven Bernecker, Amy K. Flowerree & Thomas Grundmann (eds.), The Epistemology of Fake News, Oxford University Press. 2021.
-
452Evidence, reasons, and knowledge in the reasons-first programPhilosophical Studies 181 (2): 617-625. 2023.Mark Schroeder’s Reasons First is admirable in its scope and execution, deftly demonstrating the theoretical promise of extending the reasons-first approach from ethics to epistemology. In what follows we explore how (not) to account for the evidence-that relation within the reasons-first program, we explain how factive content views of evidence can be resilient in the face of Schroeder’s criticisms, and we explain how knowledge from falsehood threatens Schroeder’s view of knowledge. Along the w…Read more
-
48Knowledge from Falsehood and Truth-ClosenessPhilosophia 50 (4): 1623-1638. 2022.The paper makes two points. First, any theory of knowledge must explain the difference between cases of knowledge from falsehood and Gettier cases where the subject relies on reasoning from falsehood. Second, the closeness-to-the-truth approach to explaining the difference between knowledge-yielding and knowledge-suppressing falsehoods does not hold up to scrutiny.
-
215 A Kantian Perspective on Robot EthicsIn Hyeongjoo Kim & Dieter Schönecker (eds.), Kant and Artificial Intelligence, De Gruyter. pp. 145-168. 2022.
-
167The Epistemology of Fake News (edited book)Oxford University Press. 2021.This book is the first sustained inquiry into the new epistemology of fake news. The chapters, authored by established and emerging names in the field, pursue three goals. First, to analyse the meaning and novelty of 'fake news' and related notions, such as 'conspiracy theory.' Second, to discuss the mechanics of fake news, exploring various practices that generate or promote fake news. Third, to investigate potential therapies for fake news.
-
52Dieter Henrich and Contemporary Philosophy. The Return to SubjectivityTijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68 (1): 188-190. 2003.
-
30Dieter Freundlieb, Dieter Henrich and Contemporary Philosophy: The Return to Subjectivity (review)Philosophical Review 115 (1): 115-117. 2006.
-
Externalism and the Attitudinal Component of Self-KnowledgeIn Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology, Oxford University Press. 2000.
-
539Warum das Gettier-Problem kein Scheinproblem istIn Gerhard Ernst & Lisa Marani (eds.), Das Gettierproblem: Eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren, Mentis. pp. 29-48. 2013.Wie der Titel des Aufsatzes bereits signalisiert, werde ich dafür argumentieren, dass das Gettier-Problem ein genuines Problem ist, keines, das sich lediglich einer falschen Fragestellung verdankt. Versuche, das Gettier-Problem aufzulösen statt zu lösen, sind zum Scheitern verurteilt. In den ersten beiden Abschnitten wird eine Typologisierung von Gettier-Fällen vorgenommen und zwischen zwei Lesarten des Gettier-Problems unterschieden. Im dritten Abschnitt werden einige Auflösungsversuche des Get…Read more
-
475Reinholds linguistischer SchematismusIn Violetta Waibel & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Kant Congress: Nature and Freedom, De Gruyter. pp. 3369-3377. 2018.In diesem Aufsatz stelle ich eine neue Interpretation der Reinhold’schen Sprachphilosophie vor. Mein Ziel ist es zu erklären, wie Reinhold der Meinung sein konnte, seine Sprachphilosophie stelle, ebenso wie seine Elementarphilosophie, den Versuch dar, Kants Kritische Philosophie zu fundieren. Außerdem möchte ich zeigen, worin die philosophische Bedeutung von Reinholds Ansatz gegenüber den Sprachphilosophien seiner Zeitgenossen besteht.
-
288Die identifikationistische Lösung des Gettier ProblemsIn Dirk Koppelberg & Stefan Tolksdorf (eds.), Erkenntnistheorie – wie und wozu?, Mentis. pp. 189-214. 2015.
-
97Against global method safetySynthese 197 (12): 5101-5116. 2018.The global method safety account of knowledge states that an agent’s true belief that p is safe and qualifies as knowledge if and only if it is formed by method M, such that her beliefs in p and her beliefs in relevantly similar propositions formed by M in all nearby worlds are true. This paper argues that global method safety is too restrictive. First, the agent may not know relevantly similar propositions via M because the belief that p is the only possible outcome of M. Second, there are case…Read more
-
302Memory and TruthIn Sven Bernecker & Kourken Michaelian (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory, Routledge. pp. 51-62. 2017.
-
628On the Blameworthiness of ForgettingIn and Denis Perrin Dorothea Debus Kourken Michaelian (ed.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory, Routledge. pp. 241-258. 2018.It is a mistake to think that we cannot be morally responsible for forgetting because, as a matter of principle, forgetting is outside of our control. Sometimes we do have control over our forgetting. When forgetting is under our control there is no question that it is the proper object of praise and blame. But we can also be morally responsible for forgetting something when it is beyond our control that we forget that thing. The literature contains three accounts of the blameworthiness of forge…Read more
-
45Medical knowledge in a social world: Introduction to the special issueSynthese 196 (11): 4351-4361. 2019.Philosophy of medicine has traditionally examined two issues: the scientific ontology for medicine and the epistemic significance of the types of evidence used in medical research. In answering each question, philosophers have typically brought to bear tools from traditional analytic philosophy. In contrast, this volume explores medical knowledge from the perspective offered by social epistemology.While many of the same issues are addressed, the approach to these issues generates both fresh ques…Read more
-
308The philosophy of memory today: Editors' introductionIn Sven Bernecker & Kourken Michaelian (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory, Routledge. pp. 1-3. 2017.
-
167Knowledge from ForgettingPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research (3): 525-540. 2017.This paper provides a novel argument for granting memory the status of a generative source of justification and knowledge. Memory can produce justified output beliefs and knowledge on the basis of unjustified input beliefs alone. The key to understanding how memory can generate justification and knowledge, memory generativism, is to bear in mind that memory frequently omits part of the stored information. The proposed argument depends on a broadly reliabilist approach to justification.
-
96A Causal Theory of Mnemonic ConfabulationFrontiers in Psychology 8. 2017.This paper attempts to answer the question of what defines mnemonic confabulation vis-à-vis genuine memory. The two extant accounts of mnemonic confabulation as “false memory” and as ill-grounded memory are shown to be problematic, for they cannot account for the possibility of veridical confabulation, ill-grounded memory, and wellgrounded confabulation. This paper argues that the defining characteristic of mnemonic confabulation is that it lacks the appropriate causal history. In the confabulat…Read more
-
1Williams, Michael, Unnatural Doubts (1991) (review)Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 48 (2): 318-321. 1994.
-
211Memory and ExternalismPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3): 605-632. 2004.Content externalism about memory says that the individuation of memory contents depends on relations the subject bears to his past environment. I defend externalism about memory by arguing that neither philosophical nor psychological considerations stand in the way of accepting the context dependency of memory that follows from externalism.
-
184Further Thoughts on Memory: Replies to Schechtman, Adams, and GoldbergPhilosophical Studies 153 (1): 109-121. 2011.This is a response to three critical discussions of my book Memory: A Philosophical Study (Oxford University Press 2010): Marya Schechtman, Memory and Identity , Fred Adams, Husker Du? , and Sanford Goldberg The Metasemantics of Memory
-
518Autoconhecimento e os limites da autenticidadeSkepsis: A Journal for Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Research 9 (13): 105-125. 2016.
-
385The Routledge Companion to Epistemology (edited book)Routledge. 2010.Epistemology, the philosophy of knowledge, is at the core of many of the central debates and issues in philosophy, interrogating the notions of truth, objectivity, trust, belief and perception. _The Routledge Companion to Epistemology_ provides a comprehensive and the up-to-date survey of epistemology, charting its history, providing a thorough account of its key thinkers and movements, and addressing enduring questions and contemporary research in the field. Organized thematically, the _Compani…Read more
-
440Memory in Analytic PhilosophyIn Dmitriĭ Vladimirovich Nikulin (ed.), Memory: A History, Oxford University Press Usa. pp. 298-315. 2015.
Irvine, California, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Metaphysics |
Philosophy of Mind |
17th/18th Century Philosophy |
Areas of Interest
Epistemology |
Metaphysics |
Philosophy of Mind |
17th/18th Century Philosophy |