-
39Nissenbaum and Neurorights: The Jury is Still OutAmerican Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2): 136-138. 2024.In their interesting paper, Susser and Cabrera (2024) apply the contextual integrity framework to brain data and mental privacy. This framework, developed by Nissenbaum (2009) and rooted in digital...
-
25The Normative Evaluation of Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice: From Invasiveness to Human RightsAmerican Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (1): 23-25. 2023.Medical interventions are usually categorized as “invasive” when they involve piercing the skin or inserting an object into the body. However, the findings of Bluhm and collaborators (2023) (hencef...
-
54Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice: On the Scope of the Moral Right to Bodily IntegrityNeuroethics 16 (3): 1-11. 2023.There is growing interest in the use of neurointerventions to reduce the risk that criminal offenders will reoffend. Commentators have raised several ethical concerns regarding this practice. One prominent concern is that, when imposed without the offender’s valid consent, neurointerventions might infringe offenders’ right to bodily integrity. While it is commonly held that we possess a moral right to bodily integrity, the extent to which this right would protect against such neurointerventions …Read more
-
29Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesisJournal of Medical Ethics. forthcoming.The possibility of neurotechnological interference with our brain and mind raises questions about the moral rights that would protect against the (mis)use of these technologies. One such moral right that has received recent attention is the right to mental integrity. Though the metaphysical boundaries of the mind are a matter of live debate, most defences of this moral right seem to assume an internalist (brain-based) view of the mind. In this article, we will examine what an extended account of…Read more
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands