-
41Responsibility and liability in criminal lawIn Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy, Oxford University Press. 2008.
-
34Philosophy and 'the life of the law'Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3): 245-258. 2009.abstract Focusing on the criminal law, I discuss three ways in which analytical philosophers might contribute to the development or health of the law (and of legal theory). The first is as humble under-labourers, who seek only to clarify legal rules and doctrines, but not to criticise them. This modest conception of the role of philosophy, however, proves to be untenable: clarification must become rational reconstruction — an attempt to make rational sense of the law; and rational reconstruction…Read more
-
74Excuses, moral and legal: a comment on Marcia Baron’s ‘excuses, excuses’Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1): 49-55. 2007.Marcia Baron has offered an illuminating and fruitful discussion of extra-legal excuses. What is particularly useful, and particularly important, is her focus on our excusatory practices—on the ways and contexts in which we make, offer, accept, bestow and reject excuses: if we are to reach an adequate understanding of excuses, their implications and their grounds, we must attend to the roles that they can play in our human activities and relationships—and to the complexities and particularities …Read more
-
96Crime, prohibition, and punishmentJournal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2). 2002.Nigel Walker’s first principle of criminalization declares that ‘Prohibitions should not be included in the criminal law for the sole purpose of ensuring that breaches of them are visited with retributive punishment’. I argue that we should reject this principle, for ‘mala prohibita’ as well as for ‘mala in se’: conduct should be criminalized in order to ensure (as far as we reasonably can) that those who engage in it receive retributive punishment. In the course of the argument, I show why we s…Read more
-
27Whose Luck is it Anyway?In Cunningham (ed.), Criminal Liability for Non-Aggressive Death, Ashgate. pp. 61-78. 2008.First paragraph: Dangerous driving attracts a maximum penalty of a heavy fine, or in the most serious cases up to six months’ imprisonment; but if it causes death, the maximum penalty is fourteen years’ imprisonment. Careless driving attracts a maximum penalty of a level 4 fine; driving whilst under the influence of drink or drugs attracts a maximum penalty of a level 5 fine and/or up to six months’ imprisonment: but if someone causes death by careless driving when under the influence of drink o…Read more
-
89Absolute Principles and Double EffectAnalysis 36 (2). 1976.I argue that hanink's account of the principle of double effect ("some light on double effect," "analysis", volume 35, number 5) is inadequate, and rests on the mistaken assumption that the criteria for distinguishing acts from each other, intention from foresight, acting from refraining, can be specified independently of any moral perspective. i try to indicate the way to a better understanding of these distinctions, and the essential features of the kind of absolutist morality which invokes th…Read more
-
192Towards a theory of criminal law?Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1): 1-28. 2010.After an initial discussion (§i) of what a theory of criminal law might amount to, I sketch (§ii) the proper aims of a liberal, republican criminal law, and discuss (§§iii–iv) two central features of such a criminal law: that it deals with public wrongs, and provides for those who perpetrate such wrongs to be called to public account. §v explains why a liberal republic should maintain such a system of criminal law, and §vi tackles the issue of criminalization—of how we should determine the prope…Read more
-
53The Limits of Virtue JurisprudenceMetaphilosophy 34 (1-2): 214-224. 2003.In response to Lawrence Solum's advocacy of a ‘virtue–centred theory of judging’, I argue that there is indeed important work to be done in identifying and characterising those qualities of character that constitute judicial virtues – those qualities that a person needs if she is to judge well (though I criticise Solum's account of one of the five pairs of judicial vices and virtues that he identifies – avarice and temperance). However, Solum's more ambitious claims – that a judge's vice necessa…Read more
-
16Crimes, Regulatory Offences and Criminal TrialsIn Müller-Dietz H. (ed.), Festschrift für Heike Jung, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. pp. 87-98. 2007.First paragraph: The awesome range of Heike Jung’s work—over different aspects of criminal law, different jurisdictions and traditions, different disciplines and languages—makes life both easier and harder for contributors to his Festschrift: easier, because one can choose almost any criminal law topic and be confident that it will connect to his work; harder (for those with the British vices of monolingualism and intellectual parochialism), since one’s paper will display the linguistic, jurisdi…Read more
-
14Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal JusticePhilosophical Review 102 (3): 438. 1993.
-
Book Review (review)Law and Philosophy 29 (2): 189-194. 2010.A review of Daniel Yeager, J L Austin and the Law: Exculpation and the Explication of Responsibility
-
1III*—Socratic Suicide?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83 (1): 35-48. 1983.R. A. Duff; III*—Socratic Suicide?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 83, Issue 1, 1 June 1983, Pages 35–48, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/
-
101Authority and responsibility in international criminal lawIn Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.), The philosophy of international law, Oxford University Press. pp. 589-604. 2010.
-
8Socratic Suicide?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83. 1983.R. A. Duff; III*—Socratic Suicide?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 83, Issue 1, 1 June 1983, Pages 35–48, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/
-
303Rule Violations and WrongdoingsIn Stephen Shute & Andrew Simester (eds.), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part, Oxford University Press. pp. 47--74. 2002.
-
62Punishment and the Duties of OffendersLaw and Philosophy 32 (1): 109-127. 2013.A critical discussion of Victor Tadros, The Ends of Harm.
-
39Realism and Imagination in Ethics By Sabina Lovibond Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983,238 pp., £15.00 (review)Philosophy 59 (230): 541-. 1984.
-
30Criminal responsibility and public reasonIn Michael D. A. Freeman & Ross Harrison (eds.), Law and Philosophy, Oxford University Press. 2007.
-
35Law, Language and Community: Some Preconditions of Criminal LiabilityOxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (2): 189-206. 1998.We can usefully distinguish the conditions of criminal liability (those conditions which must be satisfied if a defendant is to be duly convicted, with which a criminal trial is concerned) from its preconditions (those conditions which must be satisfied if the trial, as a process which aims to determine whether or not this person is criminally liable, is to be legitimate at all). Some of these preconditions concern the defendant's status as a rsponsible citizen, who can properly be called to ans…Read more
Areas of Specialization
Criminal Law |
Philosophy of Law, Miscellaneous |