•  61
  •  86
    Cultural and individual differences in the generalization of theories regarding human thinking
    with Youngjun Park
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5): 259-260. 2011.
    Tests of a universal theory often find significant variability and individual differences between cultures. We propose that descriptivism research should focus more on cultural and individual differences, especially those based on motivational factors. Explaining human thinking by focusing on individual difference factors across cultures could provide a parsimonious paradigm, by uncovering the true causal mechanisms of psychological processes
  •  106
    Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal
    with Chang H. Lee and Yoonhyoung Lee
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5): 291-292. 2012.
    We suggest that the linguistic characteristics of letters also need to be considered to fully understand how a reader processes printed words. For example, studies in Korean showed that unambiguity in the assignment of letters to their appropriate onset, vowel, or coda slot is one of the main sources of the letter-transposition effect. Indeed, the cognitive system that processes Korean is tuned to the structure of the Korean writing system.
  •  106
    That’s Not Fair! How Personal Value for Diversity Influences Reactions to the Perceived Discriminatory Treatment of Minorities
    with María del Carmen Triana and María Fernanda Wagstaff
    Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2): 211-218. 2012.
    Using Leventhal’s (Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, Plenum Press, New York, 1980 ) rules of procedural justice as well as deontic justice (Folger in Research in social issues in management, Information Age, Greenwich, CT, 2001 ), we examine how personal value for diversity moderates the negative relationship between perceived discrimination against minorities (i.e., racial minorities and females) at work and the perceived procedural justice of minorities’ treatment by the organi…Read more
  •  127
    Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology
    American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (4). 1993.
    Internalism restricts justifiers to what is "within" the subject. two main forms of internalism are (1) perspectival internalism (pi), which restricts justifiers to what the subject knows or justifiably believes, and (2) access internalism (ai), which restricts justifiers to what is directly accessible to the subject. the two forms are analyzed and interrelated, and the grounds for each are examined. it is concluded that although pi is both unacceptable and without adequate support, a modest for…Read more
  • From goal-activation to action: how does preference and use of knowledge intervene?
    with Arthur B. Markman and C. Miguel Brendl
    In Ezequiel Morsella, John A. Bargh & Peter M. Gollwitzer (eds.), Oxford handbook of human action, Oxford University Press. 2009.
  •  168
    Money and motivational activation
    with Arthur B. Markman, Serge Blok, John Dennis, Micah Goldwater, Jeff Laux, Lisa Narvaez, and Jon Rein
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2): 190-190. 2006.
    Different aspects of people's interactions with money are best conceptualized using the drug and tool theories. The key question is when these models of money are most likely to guide behavior. We suggest that the Drug Theory characterizes motivationally active uses of money and that the Tool Theory characterizes behavior in motivationally cool situations. (Published Online April 5 2006).
  •  129
    One alignment mechanism or many?
    with Arthur B. Markman, Levi B. Larkey, Lisa Narvaez, and C. Hunt Stilwell
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2): 204-205. 2004.
    Pickering & Garrod (P&G) suggest that communicators synchronize their processing at a number of linguistic levels. Whereas their explanation suggests that representations are being compared across individuals, there must be some representation of all conversation participants in each participant's head. At the level of the situation model, it is important to maintain separate representations for each participant. At other levels, it seems less crucial to have a separate representation for each p…Read more