Angelito Malicse

Abstract The question of whether the universe necessitates a Divine Creator has been debated across philosophy, theology, and science. This paper applies three universal laws—the Law of Karma (Cause and Effect + Systems), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanism—to argue that the order, fine-tuning, and self-regulation observed in the cosmos provide rational grounds for affirming the existence of a Creator. By integrating these universal laws with classical philosophical arguments such as the cosmological, teleological, and Gaia-inspired systemic perspectives, the paper contends that the universe is neither random nor accidental but reflects intentional design and governance by a Divine Creator.

Abstract This paper explores the relationship between creativity of the mind, the principles of complexity in nature, and the possible existence of a higher purpose in the universe. Drawing on the universal formula proposed by Angelito Malicse—centered on the law of balance in nature—this paper argues that both the emergence of consciousness and human creativity are not accidents of evolution but natural extensions of the same balancing processes that govern the cosmos. Consciousness is interpreted as the universe’s most advanced feedback mechanism, entrusted with the task of detecting imbalance and restoring harmony at higher levels of organization. This synthesis provides a bridge between scientific and spiritual understandings of purpose, suggesting that humanity’s role is to act as the creative guardian of balance.

Abstract The origin of human creativity has long been a subject of inquiry spanning philosophy, neuroscience, and cultural studies. This paper argues that creativity arises from the same principles that govern complexity in nature: emergence, self-organization, and adaptive balance between order and chaos. By examining parallels between natural processes and human creativity across domains such as art, science, and cooking, this paper demonstrates that the mind’s creative capacity is not an anomaly but a continuation of the universal dynamics of complexity.

Abstract Capitalistic markets and competitive sports, though governed by structured rules and regulations, remain vulnerable to cheating. This paper explores the systemic roots of cheating in both domains by examining the incentive structures, information asymmetries, and cultural pressures that encourage it. Using the universal law of balance in nature as a theoretical framework, the paper argues that cheating represents a violation of systemic equilibrium, leading to long-term instability. Examples from corporate scandals and sports doping cases are analyzed to demonstrate how imbalance produces collapse and loss of trust. Finally, the paper proposes an educational framework that teaches the principle of natural balance through sports and market simulations, embedding it into curricula to reduce societal tolerance for corruption and unfair practices.

Abstract Complexity in nature—whether biological, social, or cosmic—has long challenged human understanding. This paper proposes that complexity can be systematically explained through three universal laws: the Law of Karma (cause–effect–system integrity), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanisms. These laws provide a unifying framework for interpreting complexity across levels of reality, demonstrating that natural order is not accidental but an emergent property of lawful interactions.

Abstract The development of complex organ systems from DNA instructions exemplifies a universal principle governing nature: the law of balance. This principle asserts that local interactions governed by rules of proportion, feedback, and dynamic equilibrium generate emergent order across scales, from molecular biology to cosmic structures. This paper explores how embryonic development illustrates self-organization guided by balance, situates this principle in broader natural systems such as ecosystems and galaxies, and argues for its universality as a framework for understanding not only biological life but also societal and environmental stability.

Abstract Movement is a fundamental property of all life forms, from the microscopic motions of cells to the large-scale migration of human societies. While movements may appear spontaneous or “free,” they can be systematically explained through the laws of nature. This paper proposes a layered framework consisting of physical laws, biological laws, systems and feedback principles, and universal laws to explain how and why life moves. Through comprehensive examples and references, it demonstrates that no movement exists outside natural laws, and that even conscious human decision-making remains bound to these principles.

Abstract Luxury, often defined as goods or experiences exceeding basic necessity, has existed across civilizations. However, the form, distribution, and meaning of luxury shift dramatically under different economic systems. This paper examines luxury in pre-capitalist, capitalist, and socialist societies, analyzing whether luxury is an emergent property of capitalism. Using the framework of the three universal laws of nature—karma (cause-effect and systemic integrity), balance in nature, and feedback mechanisms—this paper argues that while luxury predates capitalism, it becomes democratized, amplified, and systematized under capitalism. The analysis reveals that luxury is not inherently harmful, but imbalance and excess introduce systemic defects that destabilize both individuals and societies.

Abstract The Wolfram Physics Project (WPP) aims to discover a fundamental rule of the universe through hypergraph rewriting systems, producing space, time, and matter as emergent structures. However, WPP is not intended to address higher-order concepts such as free will, balance in nature, or systemic harmony. This paper proposes that the Universal Formula (UF), consisting of three universal laws—(1) Karma as a System Law, (2) Balance in Nature, and (3) Feedback of Minds and Environments—serves as a complementary framework that can extend WPP. The UF introduces evaluative criteria for candidate physical rules, links substrate physics with emergent notions of agency and decision-making, and provides a bridge between physics, consciousness, and societal order.

Abstract This paper explores the continuum through which natural energies and forces—from the four fundamental forces of physics to biological evolution and human cognition—have culminated in the emergence of modern society. It argues that modern civilization is not separate from nature but a direct extension of energy transformations governed by universal laws. The analysis highlights how matter, life, and consciousness emerged from cosmic energies, and how human societies transformed these forces into cultural, technological, and political systems. The conclusion emphasizes the continuing necessity of balancing natural laws in order to sustain modern society, with a special focus on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the possibility of superintelligent systems shaping the future.

Abstract The problem of free will has been debated for millennia across philosophy, neuroscience, and psychology. Traditional approaches often treat free will as an abstract, metaphysical concept, resulting in unresolved debates. This paper presents a universal formula for free will, grounded in three interrelated natural laws: the Law of Karma (system integrity), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanisms. This formula provides a complete and practical solution by framing free will as decision-making constrained by system functionality, natural balance, and social/environmental interactions. Real-world examples illustrate its application, demonstrating its logical consistency and practical relevance.

Abstract Corruption remains one of the most persistent and detrimental issues affecting societies worldwide. This paper examines the psychology of corruption, integrating insights from psychology, sociology, economics, and political science. It explores individual cognitive and personality factors, social and cultural influences, and situational or structural conditions that facilitate corruption. Furthermore, it discusses psychological mechanisms that justify unethical behavior and outlines strategies for prevention and reduction.

Abstract Consciousness has long been one of the most profound mysteries in science. While many theories attempt to explain its origins and functions, an emerging perspective posits that consciousness evolved as a mechanism for maintaining balance within living systems. This paper explores consciousness as an adaptive tool that monitors and regulates both internal physiological states and external environmental interactions, functioning as a natural balancing mechanism shaped by evolutionary pressures.

Abstract Human beings face a profound limitation: the inability to perceive their own defective brain function or mental abnormality. Because the brain is both perceiver and judge, distortions in cognition often remain invisible to the self. This paper examines psychological, neurological, and philosophical literature that explains why individuals are blind to their own imbalance, and relates this limitation to the universal law of balance in nature. A conceptual framework is proposed in which feedback mechanisms—including interpersonal relationships, science, and holistic education—function as corrective systems. The discussion highlights the implications of integrating the universal law of balance into education, leadership training, and social governance.

Abstract Negative human behavior—such as greed, violence, corruption, and dishonesty—has long been studied in philosophy, psychology, and sociology. However, it can also be explained systematically through the lens of physical laws and Angelito Malicse’s Universal Formula, which integrates the Law of Karma (Cause–Effect and System Integrity), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanisms of Conscious Minds. This paper argues that negative behavior is the natural result of system defects, imbalances, and faulty feedback loops, and it can be corrected by applying the three universal laws in human decision-making, education, and leadership.

Abstract Religious dogma has historically shaped human behavior, cultural norms, and national policies. While offering spiritual guidance, rigid adherence to doctrinal teachings has contributed to significant social and ecological problems. Among the most pressing is overpopulation, which fuels poverty, gender inequality, and environmental collapse. This essay examines the ways in which religious dogma sustains overpopulation and argues that the universal law of balance in nature—a principle of the universal formula—offers an exact framework to address the problem. By teaching this principle through a holistic educational system and practical policy reforms, societies can harmonize faith with science and ensure sustainable population growth.

1. Introduction If everything in existence is a manifestation of energies and forces in nature, then material wealth is not an independent reality but a social construct created by the human mind. The question arises: why did human societies evolve the concept of wealth, when nature itself only recognizes balance and continuous cycles of energy? The answer lies In the interaction between human consciousness, survival needs, and natural laws. Material wealth emerged as a symbolic feedback mechanism to regulate access to resources. When aligned with the universal formula—the law of karma (cause and effect in systems), the law of balance, and the law of feedback—it can sustain life and society. But when it violates these laws, it produces imbalance, suffering, and collapse.

Abstract Corruption undermines governance, erodes trust, and obstructs socio-economic development. While no government system can completely eliminate corruption, institutional design, transparency mechanisms, and civic participation can significantly minimize its occurrence. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for a model government system that blends democratic legitimacy with technocratic efficiency, supported by strong institutions, radical transparency, and citizen empowerment. Drawing upon global best practices and scholarly literature, this study outlines structural, legal, and digital reforms necessary to reduce corruption systematically.

Abstract The rapid progress of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies has fueled fears of widespread unemployment as machines increasingly replace human labor. This paper argues that such concerns, while understandable, overlook the broader socio-economic implications of a highly productive society. In economies where AI enhances efficiency and reduces production costs, scarcity ceases to be the central issue; instead, equitable distribution of wealth and access to goods and services become paramount. Given that fiat money is a medium of exchange managed by central banks, Universal Basic Income (UBI) emerges as a viable and necessary policy response. By decoupling livelihood from employment, UBI ensures that all citizens benefit from technological progress and shared prosperity. This paper reviews the literature on automation, examines the role of money in modern economies, and evaluates UBI as a sustainable solution to potential disruptions in labor markets.

Abstract This paper explores the contrast between the ordinary and extraordinary mind in relation to human motivation, societal progress, and the universal law of balance in nature. The ordinary mind, rooted in material and financial pursuits, sustains survival and social stability, while the extraordinary mind, oriented toward cosmic understanding, expands human consciousness and knowledge. By integrating classical philosophy, modern psychology, and cosmology with the universal formula of balance, this paper argues that both ordinary and extraordinary minds are essential to the equilibrium of civilization. Their interaction forms a dynamic feedback system that not only preserves human life but also drives its evolution.

Abstract The transition from non-organic to organic energy systems—the origin of life—is one of the most profound challenges in science. This paper explores how the fundamental laws of physics governing energy, entropy, and chemical interactions can be understood through a broader meta-framework: the three universal laws of nature (law of karma, law of balance, and law of feedback). By mapping physical processes to these universal laws, we illustrate how stable organic systems emerged from inorganic energies and self-organized into the foundation of life. We also integrate contemporary research on prebiotic chemistry, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and systems theory to strengthen the theoretical framework.

Abstract The universe operates without concern for life or extinction. Galaxies form and collapse, stars ignite and fade, planets exist without life, and cosmic order proceeds without preference. Yet on Earth, life has emerged, and with it, consciousness. This essay argues that while the universe is indifferent, the universal formula—laws of system integrity, natural balance, and feedback among minds—provides a framework for why conscious beings must care. The worth of being born lies not in universal importance but in local responsibility: to sustain balance, repair defects, and design feedback loops that preserve life in an uncaring cosmos.

Abstract The transition from biological evolution to informational evolution marks a fundamental turning point in human history. While biological evolution shaped the physical and cognitive foundations of humanity, informational evolution—based on knowledge, culture, and education—now determines the trajectory of human development. However, this stage remains premature, as ignorance, misinformation, and fragmented understanding dominate global society. This paper argues that the universal formula of natural laws, particularly the law of balance, provides a framework for guiding informational evolution. By implementing a holistic educational system aligned with natural principles, humanity can transcend its premature stage and consciously shape its collective future.

Abstract Political corruption has long been understood as a persistent challenge to governance, development, and social trust. While most explanations focus on moral failure or institutional weakness, this paper argues that corruption is fundamentally a manifestation of imbalance in the distribution of richness (wealth). Drawing from the universal law of balance in nature, the paper proposes that corruption emerges at both extremes of poverty and wealth concentration, while a balanced level of richness minimizes its occurrence. By integrating insights from political science, economics, and philosophy, this framework identifies equilibrium in wealth distribution as a natural solution to corruption.

Abstract The “hard problem of consciousness” (Chalmers, 1995) asks why and how subjective experience arises from physical processes in the brain. While neuroscience has advanced explanations for cognitive functions, it remains unable to explain qualia—the first-person aspect of consciousness. This paper proposes that the hard problem can be addressed through three universal natural laws: (1) the law of karma (cause-effect-system integrity), (2) the law of balance in nature, and (3) the law of feedback between minds and environment. These laws provide a framework in which consciousness is not an inexplicable byproduct but a necessary function of systemic balance and error-free operation. A comparison with Integrated Information Theory (IIT), Global Workspace Theory (GWT), and panpsychism highlights the unique explanatory power of this framework. The conclusion suggests that subjective experience is inevitable in systems that follow these universal laws, offering a novel solution to the hard problem of consciousness.

Abstract The nature of consciousness remains one of the most profound and debated questions in philosophy and neuroscience. While materialist accounts dominate, alternative frameworks argue that consciousness cannot be reduced to brain activity alone. This paper examines ten central objections commonly raised against non-reductive theories of consciousness, ranging from neuroscientific evidence of brain-dependence to claims that consciousness is an illusion. Each objection is addressed with counterarguments drawn from philosophy, psychology, and empirical research on anomalous experiences. The analysis suggests that while neuroscience offers valuable correlations, it does not resolve the “hard problem” of consciousness. A pluralistic and integrative approach may therefore be required to advance our understanding of mind and reality.

Abstract The question of the origin and nature of space remains one of the deepest challenges in physics, cosmology, and philosophy. While modern science describes space as a dynamic aspect of spacetime, emerging with the Big Bang and evolving through cosmic expansion, philosophy has long considered it either as an eternal backdrop or an emergent property of relations. This paper interprets the origin and nature of space through the framework of the Three Universal Laws of Nature (Universal Formula), namely: (1) the Law of Karma (cause–effect–system integrity), (2) the law of Balance in Nature, and (3) the Law of Feedback between Conscious Minds and Environment. It argues that space is not a passive void but an active, law-governed system, integral to both physical existence and conscious experience.

Abstract Time has long been a central concept in physics, philosophy, and cosmology, yet its origin and nature remain deeply debated. Classical physics treats time as absolute, while modern relativity demonstrates its relative, context-dependent nature. This paper proposes a novel perspective integrating traditional physics with a systems-based approach derived from the Universal Law of Balance, herein called the universal formula. Time is presented as an emergent property of interacting systems, arising from feedback mechanisms and the dynamic maintenance of balance. This framework unifies the physical, philosophical, and systemic understanding of time.

Abstract Dreams are among the most enigmatic functions of the human brain, often perceived as random or symbolic experiences during sleep. Neuroscience identifies dreams primarily as a byproduct of REM (Rapid Eye Movement) sleep, where brain activity is comparable to wakefulness, and emotional and memory networks are highly active. This paper proposes that the process of dreaming aligns with a universal law of balance in nature, as outlined in Angelito Malicse’s universal formula. Dreams serve as an internal feedback mechanism through which the brain reorganizes memory, regulates emotional states, and simulates future scenarios, thereby restoring balance within the system of consciousness.

Abstract: This paper explores the foundational role of information systems in the development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), emphasizing the necessity for completeness and correctness in data. Drawing parallels between AGI and human consciousness, we argue that the integrity of information is paramount for the emergence of free will and meaningful decision-making in artificial systems. The discussion integrates perspectives from cognitive science, philosophy of mind, and AI ethics to propose a framework wherein AGI’s capabilities are inherently linked to the quality of its informational substrates.