-
51Hawthorne discusses (without endorsing) the following instance of our (T1) , “One knows that one is seeing a desk by taking for granted, but without knowing, that one is not a brain in a vat” (510). We believe that this is a commonsensical way of describing an ordinary situation. Intuitively, one knows one is seeing a desk. Intuitively one is normally justified in taking it for granted that one is not a brain in a vat, but one does not know one isn’t a brain in a vat.
-
9Is There a Single True Morality?In Paul K. Moser & Thomas L. Carson (eds.), Moral Relativism: A Reader, Oxford University Press. pp. 165. 2001.
-
Wide functionalismIn Stephen Schiffer & Susan Steele (eds.), Cognition and Representation, Westview Press. pp. 11--20. 1988.
-
21New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind (review)Journal of Philosophy 98 (5): 265-269. 2001.
-
112Reflections on knowledge and its limitsPhilosophical Review 111 (3): 417-428. 2002.Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits is the most important philosophical discussion of knowledge in many years. It sets the agenda for epistemology for the next decade and beyond.
-
7IntentionalityIn William Bechtel & George Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science, Blackwell. 1998.A proper understanding of intentionality is crucial to the study of a number of topics in cognitive science, including perception, imagery, and consciousness. The term itself, intentionality, can be misleading, in suggesting intentional action, doing something intentionally, with a certain aim or purpose. In cognitive science, the term is used in a different, more technical sense. Intentionality involves reference or aboutness or some similar relation to something having what the scholastics of …Read more
-
3The toxin puzzleIn Jules L. Coleman, Christopher W. Morris & Gregory S. Kavka (eds.), Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka, Cambridge University Press. pp. 84--89. 1998.
-
340Metaphysical realism and moral relativism: Reflections on Hilary Putnam's reason, truth and historyJournal of Philosophy 79 (10): 568-575. 1982.Putnam rejects "metaphysical realism," which takes "the world" to be a single complex thing, a connected causal or explanatory order into which all facts fit. he argues that such metaphysical realism is responsible for views he finds implausible; in particular, it can lead to moral relativism when one tries to locate the place of value in the world of fact. i agree that metaphysical realism will lead a thoughtful philosopher to moral relativism, but find neither of these views implausible. in pa…Read more
-
64Rationality in AgreementSocial Philosophy and Policy 5 (2): 1. 1988.Gauthier's title is potentially misleading. The phrase “morals by agreement” suggests a social contract theory of morality according to which basic moral principles arise out of an actual or hypothetical agreement. John Rawls defends a hypothetical agreement version, arguing that the basic principles of justice are those that would be agreed to in an initial position of fair equality. I myself defend an actual agreement version, arguing that the moral principles that apply to a person derive fro…Read more
-
281Field on the Normative Role of LogicProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3). 2009.I begin by summarizing the first two chapters of (Harman 1986). The first chapter stresses the importance of not confusing inference with implication and of not confusing reasoning with the sort of argument studied in deductive logic. Inference and reasoning are psychological events or processes that can be done more or less well. The sort of implication and argument studied in deductive logic have to do with relations among propositions and with structures of propositions distinguished into pre…Read more
-
81The Nonexistence of Character TraitsProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2): 223-226. 2000.
-
95What is distinctive about my views in epistemology? One thing is that my concern with epistemology is a concern with methodology. Furthermore, I reject psychologism about logic and reject the idea that deductive rules like modus ponens are in any way rules of inference. I accept a kind of methodological conservatism and reject methodological theories that appeal to special foundations, analytic truth, or a priori justification. Although I believe that there are significant practical aspects of t…Read more
-
492ThoughtPrinceton University Press. 1973.Thoughts and other mental states are defined by their role in a functional system. Since it is easier to determine when we have knowledge than when reasoning has occurred, Gilbert Harman attempts to answer the latter question by seeing what assumptions about reasoning would best account for when we have knowledge and when not. He describes induction as inference to the best explanation, or more precisely as a modification of beliefs that seeks to minimize change and maximize explanatory coherenc…Read more
-
362Moral explanations of natural facts – can moral claims be tested against moral reality?Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (S1): 57-68. 1986.
-
8039What is moral relativism?In A. I. Goldman & I. Kim (eds.), Values and Morals, D. Reidel. pp. 143--161. 1978.
-
7Philosophy of languageIn Gerhard Preyer (ed.), Donald Davidson on truth, meaning, and the mental, Oxford University Press. pp. 39. 2012.
-
89Can science understand the mind?In Conceptions of the Human Mind: Essays in Honor of George A. Miller, Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 111--121. 1993.
-
33Skepticism and foundationsIn Luper Steven (ed.), The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays, Ashgate Press. pp. 1--11. 2003.
-
163Knowledge, assumptions, lotteriesPhilosophical Issues 14 (1). 2004.John Hawthorne’s marvelous book contains a wealth of arguments and insights based on an impressive knowledge and understanding of contemporary discussion. We can address only a small aspect of the topic. In particular, we will offer our own answers to two questions about knowledge that he discusses.
Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America