Andrii Myshko

Twentieth-century philosophy successfully established process and becoming as fundamental traits of reality. However, this achievement remained descriptive: becoming was recognized, but never derived. This paper introduces Metamonism as a methodological shift from axiom-based ontology toward ontological prohibition (generative constraint). Instead of asserting being or interpreting its meaning, Metamonism eliminates absolute identity as a logically impossible state. Becoming emerges not as a postulate but as a necessary consequence. This marks a transition from hermeneutic ontology to architectural reasoning over ad- missible states.

Special and General Relativity, together with Quantum Mechanics, constitute theories that are mathematically rigorous and empirically validated. Their predictive power is unquestionable. However, their ontological interpretation — what they implicitly claim about the nature of reality itself — remains fundamentally flawed. This paper proposes a radical re-foundation of physics through Metamonism: a methodological framework grounded in a foundational axiom — the prohibition of identity (or indifference). Reality is treated not as a collection of entities but as a continuous process of actualization that intrinsically prohibits fixation. Within this framework, space, time, energy, particles, and fields are understood not as primary constituents of being but as secondary modes of a single process — the actualized Monos. We demonstrate that the invariance of the speed of light, gravitation, and the so-called quantum collapse acquire coherent explanation when reality is understood as pure becoming, while fixation appears as a cognitive artifact produced by the limitations of Logos.

This paper proposes an ontological model in which the meaning of life is not treated as an anthropocentric goal, value, or justification, but as a dynamic effect of a more fundamental process: the co-being of Monos and Logos. Monos and Logos are interpreted as isomorphic modes of difference-generation, enacted respectively in actual and possible modalities of being. It is argued that Logos, by introducing an excess of forms of difference, ontologically enriches reality rather than merely representing it. On this basis, meaning is redefined not as a teleological end, but as a potential difference between what is actual and what can be otherwise. Human existence is understood as a local node of co-being, in which this potential difference may be sustained, intensified, or collapsed. The paper thereby reframes the question of meaning as an ontological problem concerning the conditions under which being avoids collapse into self-identity and indifference.

We propose an ontological reinterpretation of the quantum measurement problem using a process based framework. The photon is not treated as a particle or wave, but as a metastable process capable of transforming into multiple physical forms (thermal, electrical, chemical, or mechani- cal). The double slit experiment is reinterpreted as a spatially distributed process whose trans formation is either deferred to the detection screen or forced earlier by measurement near the slits. Interference arises not from wave behavior but from delayed transformation. Measurement corresponds to an ontological phase transition of the process, not to information acquisition or wavefunction collapse. It does not replace the standard quantum formalism, but offers an alternative ontological interpretation of it. Formally, this framework is expressed as a formal ontological schema articulated via primitive processual operators of differentiation, fixation, and dissipation (diff/fix/diss), rather than as a predictive mathematical formalism. This approach reframes the ontological basis of the measurement problem, eliminates observer-dependence, and aligns quantum phenomena with general principles of dissipative process ontology.

Quantum computing promises to revolutionize computation by leveraging superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference. This paper examines whether it can bridge the ontological divide between processual reality (Monos) and representational structures (Logos) in the context of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Drawing on Metamonism CORE = v1.3, we argue that quantum systems, as currently conceived, accelerate stabilization rather than prevent it, remaining trapped in Logos-dominant paradigms. We distinguish the illusion of an ontological bridge—where quantum processuality serves classical fixation—from a genuine integration that could enable enforced Unfold. While quantum dynamics approximates Monos, measurement enforces Logos, making quantum computing a more efficient optimizer rather than a pathway to non equilibrium cognition. This analysis reframes quantum computing not as an AGI enabler but as a test case for ontological viability in intelligence research and establishes it as a prime example of accelerated fixation, disqualifying it from consideration as a foundation for non-equilibrium cognition.

Contemporary approaches to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) rely predominantly on behavioral benchmarks, optimization performance, and scaling laws. This paper argues that such approaches are ontologically insufficient. Intelligence cannot be verified through behavior or task performance; it can only be falsified through the presence of forbidden ontological structures. We introduce the Ontological Test Suite (OTS), a set of falsification-based criteria designed to identify systems that are ontologically incapable of intelligence, regardless of their performance, creativity, or utility. Grounded in a minimal process ontology (Metamonism CORE v1.3), we formalize intelligence as the continuous impossibility of final stabilization and introduce Unfold as a mandatory, non-representable rupture preventing cognitive selfidentity. OTS does not confirm AGI; it excludes non-AGI. This reframes the AGI problem as one of ontological viability rather than architectural ingenuity.

This paper presents a formal ontological model in which the fact is not a primitive element of reality but an epistemic construct generated by the operation of fixation (fix) within the dual-layered Metamonist framework of Monos (ontological process) and Logos (epistemic representation). Grounded in the foundational Indifference Prohibition Axiom—"absolute identity is ontologically impossible"—we demonstrate that facts emerge as discrete nodes interposed between cause and effect only through selective stabilization of a continuous, non-identical process. We define a fact as Fact = fix(M[t1, t2]), where M denotes the Monos flow and t1, t2 are observer-dependent boundaries. This model reframes causality, scientific knowledge, and quantum measurement as consequences of operational constraints rather than features of fundamental reality. The work constitutes a complete, falsifiable module of the Metamonist system, demonstrating its capacity to resolve classical philosophical problems without postulating new entities.

This paper proposes an operational redefinition of the key concepts of metamonism—Monos and Logos. It is shown that their traditional interpretation as philosophical or ontological categories generates excessive metaphysical interpretations. Instead, we propose to consider Monos and Logos as concepts of a process framework—operational elements for analyzing systems at various levels of reality. Deontologization strengthens the methodological rigor of metamonism and expands its scope of application. Using examples from scientific revolutions, quantum mechanics, and cognitive processes, we demonstrate the analytical power of the operational approach. The work establishes new foundations for interdisciplinary application of the metamonist framework and shows its convergence with the physical model of Ricci flow scalping (Myshko, 2026a).

This work proposes an operational reinterpretation of nucleogenesis as a process of high-frequency scalping (HFT) of Ricci flow at the Planck horizon. Reality is considered not as a volumetric medium, but as a dynamic fixation surface bounded by the light front (axiom 1: space does not yet exist) and the Planck limit (axiom 2: space no longer exists). We introduce a modified Ricci flow equation with a surgical operator , activated upon reaching Planck density. The model demonstrates structural isomorphism between physical processes (particle fixation, neutron decay, inflation) and financial market operations (scalping, stop-orders, candlestick patterns). We formalize the -operator (micro-level scalping surgery) and -operator (macro-level inflationary drift). Testable predictions are made: discreteness of nucleogenesis, correlation of particle lifetimes with structural complexity, and the presence of "inflationary memory" in the large-scale structure of the Universe. The work is conducted within the operational framework of Metamonism.

This article examines Andrii Myshko's contribution to the development of process ontology through the lens of his "metamonism" framework. It is shown that the key achievement lies not in continuing the traditional line (Heraclitus – Whitehead – Prigogine – Deleuze), but in its radical axiomatization. The central principle of metamonism — the prohibition of indifference (A ≠ A) — is introduced and analyzed as a negative ontological condition for the possibility of existence. We demonstrate how this axiom transforms processual intuition from philosophical statement into a rigorous logical-operational instrument, generating a new class of interdisciplinary isomorphisms and falsifiable predictions.

This article presents metamonism — an instrumental, interdisciplinary philosophical framework grounded in process ontology. Proceeding from a single ontological axiom (the prohibition of indifference), metamonism provides a universal language for analyzing complex systems across physics, biology, psychology, and sociology. The framework introduces key operators — Monos (reality-as-process) and Logos (model-space), along with their functional dynamics (diff and fix) — to reveal structural isomorphisms between seemingly disparate phenomena. Through examples ranging from quantum mechanics to civilizational collapse, we demonstrate how metamonism transforms from philosophical speculation into a predictive and diagnostic tool for understanding reality's fundamental dynamics.

This article analyzes the dynamics of civilizations through the lens of metamonism—an interdisciplinary framework based on processual ontology. Based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference, it is shown that the collapse of civilization is isomorphic to an "evolutionary dead end" and biological death. It is argued that the demise of a social system occurs at the moment when its resources are redirected from producing new differences (diff) to maintaining rigid self-identity (fix). The civilization transforms into "social Logos," loses connection with the living Monos of history, and annihilates.

This article examines biological evolution through the lens of metamonism—an interdisciplinary framework based on processual ontology. Based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference, it is shown that the evolutionary process is viable only as long as dynamic difference (diff) between species and environment is preserved. It is argued that the cessation of differentiation and fixation of species traits outside the context of the environment (the common Monos) transforms a species into "biological Logos," which inevitably leads to its extinction as a state of final indifference.

his article investigates the isomorphism between oncological and psychiatric pathologies through the lens of metamonism—an interdisciplinary framework based on processual ontology. Based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference, it is shown that the terminal stage of disease occurs when local dominance of self-identity (fix) cascades to the level of the entire system, leading to the loss of Monos's capacity for differentiation (diff → 0). It is substantiated that cancerous tumors and psychological trauma are regimes of biological death, where the system's attainment of complete self-identity is ontologically equivalent to transition into the state of "Nothingness."

This article examines quantum mechanics through the lens of metamonism—an interdisciplinary processual framework based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference. It is shown that quantum processes and models describing them are isomorphic in their set of operations (diff / fix), but radically differ in their ontological status. On this basis, the epistemological limit of fixing quantum states is formalized, and the role of metamonism as a bridge between quantum reality and its formal descriptions is substantiated.

This article examines the epistemological distinction between Monos and Logos within the framework of metamonism—an interdisciplinary processual framework based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference. It is shown that Monos and Logos are isomorphic in their set of operations (diff / fix), but radically differ in their ontological status and admissibility. On this basis, the fundamental epistemological limit of cognizing unique processes is formalized, and the role of metamonism as a bridge between reality and its formal descriptions is substantiated.

Metamonism presents an interdisciplinary processual framework for investigating reality through the search for isomorphisms between different levels of organiza- tion. This work does not propose a new process ontology competing with theories of Whitehead, Deleuze, or Bergson, but rather operationalizes their ideas into a prag- matic tool. The framework is based on the principle of prohibition of self-identity, from which structures observable from cosmology to information systems are de- rived. The article demonstrates the application of the framework to the problem of the ontological status of information, formulates interdisciplinarity as the study of isomorphisms, and offers testable predictions in physics and cosmology.

We propose an ontological unification of the four fundamental interactions based on dissipative process monism. Rather than treating gravity, electromagnetism, weak, and strong interactions as independent phenomena requiring separate mathematical frameworks, we demonstrate that they represent different regimes andgeometries of a single underlying process—the dissipation of actualization flux. Gravity emerges as global screening, electromagnetism as stationary centrifugal translation, weak interaction as topological reconfiguration, and strong interactio as local configuration stabilization. This framework explains the hierarchy of interaction strengths, the variation in ranges, parity violation in weak interaction, an asymptotic freedom in strong interaction as natural consequences of dissipative mechanics. We demonstrate that current mathematical theories (general relativity gauge theory) correctly describe the effective dynamics while the dissipative frame work reveals the underlying ontological process. Testable predictions distinguishin this approach from standard theory are provided.

We propose an ontological resolution of the aether problem based on process monism of actualization. We demonstrate that spacetime and matter represent different regimes of a unified dissipative process emerging from the law of autonegation. Matter is interpreted as the result of critical concentration of the global actualization flux and its subsequent topological inversion. The neutron is defined as the primary node of maximal densification, from which the proton-electron structure forms through phase transition. All fundamental interactions are reduced to a unified mechanics of centripetal and centrifugal dissipation vectors.

This article substantiates a fundamental reform of international law through the prism of the historical evolution of capital and structural patterns of modern civilization. The author proves that the state is a fiduciary mechanism of soci- ety, usurpation of power represents a violation of fiduciary duty requiring exclusion of the regime from international law and intervention under UN mandate. The central thesis: capital, having exhausted all traditional degrees of freedom (geo- graphic expansion, technological intensification, financialization), has only one path for further growth—transforming humanity into quality consumers through liberalization of autocracies. This is not the final goal but a necessary condition for space expansion—the next phase of civilizational development. For the first time in history, the moral imperative (human dignity), economic logic (market expansion), and existential necessity (interplanetary civilization) converge into a unified vector. The article analyzes the Maduro regime as a test case for implementing a new doctrine of intervention, examines Elon Musk’s role as a conscious agent of this process, and outlines mechanisms for legitimizing interventions through UN procedures.

Gravity is the mutual screening of the primary dissipative flow of spacetime by secondary dissipative flows. Baryons, dissipating counter to the global actualization flow, create shadow zones of reduced intensity of being. The imbalance of dissipative pressure pushes bodies toward each other into zones of mutual shadow. This is perceived as "attraction." The model explains relativistic effects through the gradient of actualization intensity (Ψ), preserving the mathematical precision of General Relativity while replacing the geometric paradigm ("curvature") with an ontological one ("reduction in the quantity of being").

This paper proposes an ontological model in which space and time are considered not as independent dimensions but as a unified entity—spacetime—possessing its own structure and finite tempo of actualization. It is shown that the fundamental constant c (the speed of light in vacuum) expresses not the limiting velocity of object motion but the maximum tempo at which degrees of freedom can transition into a stable state and be incorporated into the causal structure. This tempo is determined by the dynamic balance between the emergence of distinctions and their fixation. To clarify the ontological status of this limit, an isomorphic metaphor of virtual reality with limited hardware rendering rate is employed.

Between 2025 and 2026, a complete philosophical system—Metamonism—was created in nine months by an individual without formal training in philosophy, physics, or mathematics, using AI as a cognitive partner in real-time dialogical exploration. This paper examines this case as a precedent for understanding how artificial intelligence fundamentally transforms not just the speed of knowledge production, but its very mode. We argue that AI enables a new epistemological paradigm: dialogical crystallization, where learning, discovery, and systematization occur simultaneously rather than sequentially. The implications extend beyond philosophy to all forms of foundational knowledge creation.

PREFACE: STATUS OF THIS DOCUMENT What This Document Is This document defines the ontological core of Metamonism. It specifies: What kinds of entities are allowed to exist (processes, fixations, distinctions) What kinds of entities are prohibited from existing (substances, eternal identities, information as ontological entity) The fundamental structure of reality (recursion-dissipation dynamics, time as derivative, distinction as generative) Category boundaries (ontology vs epistemology, process vs entity, model vs reality) This is a foundational specification, not a scientific theory in the conventional sense.

This work proves that information does not exist ontologicallyit exists only as an epis- temological model endowed with the predicate of distinction. Through rigorous proof of isomorphism between 'Nothingness' and 'Information', we demonstrate that possessing the predicate of distinction is necessary for conceivability but insucient for existence. The consequences of this thesis are fundamental: critique of Wheeler's it from bit, reconcep- tualization of quantum information, refutation of the computational model of consciousness, resolution of confusion between physical and informational entropy, and dissolution of the black hole information paradox. This work demonstrates that computers ontologically process not information but real xations of material states, and that the informational paradigm in physics and cognitive science is a category mistakeconation of ontology and epistemology. The work advances a falsiable claim: if information existed ontologically, it would be possible to dene physical processes whose causal ecacy depends on information alone. No such processes exist. Keywords: information, ontology, epistemology, Nothingness, predicate of distinction, computation, xation, it from bit, quantum information, consciousness, black holes, information paradox

Metamonism posits a dynamically renewing universe in which matter is continuously generated and dissipated through two distinct observational channels: (1) Birth zone — primordial atomic hydrogen and deuterium emerge in cosmic voids and migrate along filaments into galaxy halos; (2) Graveyards—stellar and planetary remnants lose topological stability and dissipate into photon-like radiation. Both phenomena are falsifiable through qualitative observational signatures that distinguish them from ΛCDM predictions. We present discriminatory criteria based on composition, topology, kinematics, and spectral features, and propose an observational program using SKA, ELT, and next-generation transient surveys. A null result would falsify Metamonism; confirmation would mark the first empirical signature of ontological renewal in cosmology.

This work completes the systematic construction of Metamonism by revealing its fourth fundamental mode—mathematics, understood not as a science of abstract objects, but as formal phenomenology of the operations diff (differentiation) and fix (fixation). It is shown that these operations, being the ontological origins of Logos as the operational hypostasis of Monos, constitute the foundation of mathematical reality preceding the concepts of number, set, and proof. Within the proposed axiomatics, basic mathematical concepts are derived, and G¨odel’s incompleteness theorems receive ontological proof as direct consequences of the prohibition of selfidentity (t ̸= t). Mathematics emerges as the pure domain of Logos realization, and its foundational crises as evidence of its deep connection with the principle of incomplete fixability. The work integrates this mode into the completed architecture of Metamonism, where physics, consciousness, and mathematics constitute the threefold phenomenology of one non-substantial Principle.

The Conscious Hypergraph Model (CHG) is a formal system integrating psychological phenomena, physical constraints, and ontological principles to describe consciousness. Unlike traditional models that focus on functional descriptions, CHG identifies structural limitations that render consciousness impossible in conventional digital architectures. The model formalizes concepts of internal conflict, metastability, veto mechanisms, deadlock states, and breakdown dynamics, creating a unified framework that enables diagnosis of potential consciousness, prediction of its dynamics, and ethical evaluation of its creation. We demonstrate that consciousness necessarily entails ontological cost—the capacity to suffer—and that any system failing to pay this price cannot be conscious, regardless of behavioral sophistication. This work establishes CHG as both a negative ontology of consciousness and an ethical firewall for AI development.

This work completes the Metamonism trilogy by demonstrating that consciousness is neither a product of matter nor an independent substance, but rather a mode of Monos— a localized realization of recursive evasion from the fixation limit. Following the trilogy’s methodological principle, consciousness is introduced before humans, brains, and experience, as a regime of Monos realization under specific conditions. Key discoveries: (1) Qualia as fixation of distinctions through filters (dead operators); (2) The Self as a fractal ensemble of five hierarchical layers creating a stable pattern of directing dissipation; (3) Three illusions of selfhood (continuity, agency, wholeness) generated by the reflexive fix; (4) Death as a local fixation limit (lim(diff → 0)); (5) Dead operators as recursion filters that direct dissipation and change the geometry of consciousness; (6) AI ontologically cannot have consciousness—not due to being inorganic, but because AI strives for auto-identity (triumph of fix) while consciousness is the triumph of error over accuracy (triumph of diff). The work strictly derives from foundations established in THE VERB and FORCES, introducing no new entities

This work debugs fundamental concepts of physics through the lens of Metamonism. The author demonstrates that matter, space, and forces are not independent entities but represent stages of recursive evasion of the primary process (the Verb) from the state of auto-identity. For the first time, a unified definition of the four interactions is given as operational regimes of balance between Distinction (diff) and Fixation (fix). It is shown that gravity results from mutual screening of masses in an ocean of centrifugal pressure arising from continuous dissipation of all corpuscles. Electromagnetism is interpreted as dynamic oscillation between diff operations (electric field) and fix operations (magnetic field). Weak interaction is explained as a mechanism for discharging excess distinction during structure stabilization. Strong interaction is linked to the irrationality of π, which prevents absolute closure of the sphere. The central discovery: dissipation is the continuous destruction of symmetry and identity, necessary to avoid auto-identity. This is an ontological necessity built into the very fact of structure existence. Furthermore, we establish that there exist two generations of closed structures with opposite directions of dissipation: space-time dissipates inward (generating corpuscles), while corpuscles dissipate outward (sustaining space-time). This creates a closed dynamic nonequilibrium cycle ensuring the stability of the manifest world without achieving equilibrium. The work builds upon foundations laid in the treatise “THE VERB: On First Principles” Myshko 2025 and develops processual ontology toward physics and cosmology