Andrii Myshko

This work presents a novel ontological framework for understanding matter, confinement, and particle stability, rooted in the tension field ∇U that arises from the conflict between actuality (∇T) and potentiality (∇S). Within this metamonoistic ontology, we redefine baryons as triadic entanglements of half-knots—elementary loci of Becoming—stabilised by a topological invariant κ well above a critical KMI threshold. Through rigorous geometric and variational analysis, we derive a quantised closure condition governed by the Granda frequency F₀, which sets the cosmic tempo of actualisation. We demonstrate how confinement, diquark suppression, and energy quantisation emerge not from gauge fields but from the ontological necessity of self-sustaining tension knots. Comparison with standard QCD reveals that the ∇U formalism reproduces key phenomenological results while offering new, falsifiable predictions, including a distinctive exponential suppression of free diquark states. This topological reconception of confinement provides a deeper explanatory substrate uniting quantum chromodynamics, knot theory, and ontological philosophy under a single variational principle.

A new ontological theory is proposed that explains quantum nonlocality through a fundamental conflict of potencies"to be" and "not to be." The metamonistic framework introduces the concept of the ConflictMomentImpulse (CMI) as an atemporal act of actualisation that generates time, space, and matter through modal differentiation. Quantum entanglement and the quantumeraser effect are shown to emerge from extraspatial CMI links without violating causality or invoking retrocausality. We provide a concrete, technologyaware experimental protocols, a practicalconsiderations subsection, a comparison with stateoftheart quantumfoundations experiments, and a mathematical appendix detailing the Ufield formalism.

The ∇U field theory unifies gravity, gauge interactions, and matter via a single scalar field U (xμ), reproducing relativistic effects through an effective metric modified by a symmetry-breaking potential. Rooted in meta-monism, it rejects cosmic expan- sion and singularities, explaining redshift, CMB, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), nucleosynthesis, and large-scale structure in a static universe. Apparent cosmic ac- celeration arises from nonlinear redshift due to U -field dynamics, mimicking ΛCDM without dark energy. Observable deviations from GR near black holes and in high-z cosmology are testable by JWST, Planck, Euclid, EHT, SKA, and PIXIE

We propose a paradigm shift: cosmological redshift as a manifestation of photon energy loss within the Meta–Monist tension field, challenging the space-expansion paradigm of ΛCDM. Recasting Friedmann equations in the geometry of the Chaos– Polytope, we identify |∇T|—the temporal component of the tension field with the Hubble parameter a/a ˙ . A dynamical drift of |∇T| mimics time–dependent dark energy, reproducing the DESI 2025 anomaly. We predict a novel z-dependent polarization twist in quasar light, driven by the Chaos–Polytopes polarization drift βp, and anomalous gravitational wave echo-delays, alongside signatures in supernova time–stretch, Tolman surface–brightness, CMB spectrum, and baryon acoustic oscillations. An experimental roadmap (2026–2030) tests universal β–drift, facet– linked surface-brightness suppression, polarization twists, and fibre–loop analogues, addressing critical hurdles to establish Meta–Monism as a viable cosmology.

Persistent, essentially loss-free currents emerge at two vastly different scales: (i) macroscopic superconducting loops carrying tens of kiloamperes for decades and (ii) microscopic quantum orbits where bound electrons circulate without radiative decay. Classical textbooks treat these as disjoint miracles—BCS condensation versus Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization—yet both can be viewed as the same ontological maneuver: a suppression of the temporal decay vector ∇T and a simultaneous locking of spatial concentration ∇S inside the unified tension field ∇U posited by Meta-Monism. We review the historical record—from Bohr’s 1913 postulate through Büttiker–Landauer–Imry’s 1983 prediction of persistent currents to the 28-year niobium gravimeter loop—and reinterpret each milestone via the Conflictof-Potencies framework A = A′ + (−A′0). Finally, we outline an experimental roadmap whose success would elevate the Chaos-Polytope to a “periodic table” of metastable forms.

Standard physics postulates that a photon moves at c because it is massless and follows null geodesics. In the ontological framework A = A + (−A0), a deeper answer arises: the photon is a non-closed torsion vortex in the tension field ∇U . Its intrinsic topological asymmetry produces a permanent imbalance between the temporal (gravitational) and spatial (anti-gravitational) components of tension, acting as a self-contained engine. This note derives the propulsion law, explains why the velocity saturates at c, and proposes observational and laboratory tests to validate the model.

This work presents of the Meta-Monist ontological framework, formalizing reality as emergent tension between differentiated potencies—being A′A′A′ and non-being −A′0−A′₀−A′0—within a dynamic tensor field. The core equation A=τ(A′)⊕ι(−A′0)A = \tau(A′) \oplus ι(−A′₀)A=τ(A′)⊕ι(−A′0) introduces a non-commutative binding of activated and indifferent modes via tension operator τ and null embedding ι, generating second-order form tensors. The modal space M=⨂∇DkM = \bigotimes \nabla D_kM=⨂∇Dk spans temporal (∇T∇T∇T), spatial (∇S∇S∇S), material (∇U∇U∇U), and cognitive (∇C∇C∇C) gradients. Form evolution obeys a dynamic equation balancing binding potential, dissipation, ontological noise, and memory retention. Quantum-grade operators extend this dynamics into Fock spaces with unified expressions for gravity, antigravity, and electromagnetism. The model predicts fractal cosmic structures, quantum decoherence traces, and consciousness signatures as emergent from structured ∇U tension. This revision offers a computationally viable, ontologically grounded alternative to metric-based physics, uniting form genesis, phase stability, and observational phenomena under a single intensional architecture.

This paper explores the philosophical implications of the Axiom of Choice (AC) as a formalization of ontological indeterminacy. We examine how AC enables selection from infinite and even unmeasurable collections, and how this generates paradoxes such as the Vitali set and Banach-Tarski decomposition. We argue that these paradoxes are not flaws, but symptoms of an unresolved ontological tension ∇U ̸= 0. By reinterpreting AC through the lens of process ontology, we suggest that the act of choice corresponds to the morphogenetic moment when being is extracted from indistinct multiplicity. This casts the Axiom of Choice not merely as a mathematical tool, but as a fundamental ontological operator

This paper explores high-energy particle collisions through the lens of the ∇U ontological framework, proposing that such events induce gravitational field responses distinguishable from Standard Model expectations. Rooted in the tension between emergent form (A) and background potential (−A0), the ∇U approach interprets gravity as a reactive stabilization field. We argue that patterns in particle trajectories— correlated deviations, azimuthal asymmetries—can reveal this field dynamic. The analysis introduces testable predictions based on angular shifts and correlation structures, with emphasis on their statistical detectability in LHC data. Strategies for distinguishing these effects from quantum chromodynamics and detector noise are outlined.

The ∇U model offers an ontological-physical redefinition of interactions as man- ifestations of a tension field between form (A) and background (−A0). Departing from the geometric approach of General Relativity, the model formulates funda- mental interactions as resulting from tension gradients ∇U , driven by the imbalance between gravity and antigravity. A Lagrangian based on the U field is employed, with the metric gμν interpreted as an emergent description. Relativistic effects are viewed as system responses to local tension gradients, not as spacetime curva- ture. An 11-dimensional extension with two time coordinates (t, τ ) links observed dynamics to phase stability via the Granda constant F0 ≈ 1019 Hz.

This work refines the previous version by correcting the calibration parameter dimensions, simplifying the electron g-factor correction formula, and ensuring internal consistency of dimensionless quantities. The core postulates are retained: naturalization of the imaginary unit via a second time coordinate τ , reduction from 15D to 11D through coherence conditions, lepton masses via the Granda constant G and factor µ, the linkage between physical time t and ontological time τ , and boson phenomenology through fluctuations of the scalar field Ψ.

This paper reconsiders the classical philosophical dichotomy be- tween subjectivity and objectivity in light of Meta-Monism, a frame- work that views reality not as composed of substances or distinct epis- temic realms, but as a unified ontological field structured by tension. Drawing from historical developmentsfrom naïve realism through Kan- tian transcendentalismwe trace the gradual disintegration of the mind– world dualism and propose a model in which both subjectivity and objectivity emerge as complementary modulations of a deeper onto- logical process. By formalizing this process as A = A′ + (−A0), we articulate a metaphysical grammar of Being in which perception and persistence are phases of the same field. The implications of this model extend into epistemology, science, and the philosophy of mind.

This report analyzes a new theoretical model, named Meta-Monism, which proposes a radical solution to the cosmological constant problem (CCP). Unlike standard approaches, the Meta-Monism model reinterprets the cosmological constant (Λ) as a dynamic function of the “temporal tension tensor” (∇T), which, in turn, arises from a dual modality of time (T1, T2) within its philosophical foundation. The report details the ontological principles of Meta-Monism, the mathematical formulation of two-time dynamics, the introduction of a new “Granda Constant,” and specific observational predictions testable with current and future cosmological data, such as Euclid, DESI, and CMB-S4. The model’s central claim is that it explains the observed smallness of Λ without requiring fine-tuning, offering a profound connection between fundamental ontology and cosmological phenomena.

Представленный отчет анализирует новую теоретическую модель, названную Meta-Monism, которая предлагает радикальное решение проблемы космологической постоянной (ЛКП). В отличие от стандартных подходов, модель Meta-Monism переосмысливает космологическую постоянную (Λ) как динамическую функцию «тензора временного напряжения» (∇T), который, в свою очередь, возникает из двухслойной модальности времени (T₁, T₂) в рамках своей философской основы. В отчете подробно рассматриваются онтологические принципы Meta-Monism, математическая формулировка двухвременной динамики, введение новой «постоянной Гранда» и конкретные наблюдательные предсказания, которые могут быть проверены с помощью текущих и будущих космологических данных, таких как Euclid, DESI и CMB-S4. Основное утверждение модели заключается в том, что она объясняет наблюдаемую малость Λ без необходимости тонкой настройки, предлагая глубокую взаимосвязь между фундаментальной онтологией и космологическими явлениями.

The cosmological constant problem, marked by a 50120 order-of-magnitude discrepancy between theoretical predictions and observations, is a central challenge in cosmology. This work proposes a novel solution within the Meta-Monism framework, interpreting time as a dual modality (T1, T2). The cosmological constant Λ is formulated as a function of tensorial temporal tension ∇T, arising from the interplay between actual (T1) and potential (T2) time. We derive generalized Friedmann equations with Λ(T1, T2), aligning with observed values without fine-tuning. The Granda Constant (F0 ≈ 1019 Hz) sets a frequency threshold for quantum phase stability, enabling testable predictions via photon aging, void analysis, and Λ(z) evolution, verifiable with Euclid, DESI, and CMB-S4 data.

The positive-geometry program, initiated by the amplituhedron, finds a new expression in cosmohedra, polytopes encoding the cosmological wave-function of Trϕ 3 theory. In parallel, the MetaMonist framework introduces the Chaos-Polytope Xk,n, a positive geometry capturing scattering amplitudes and the dynamics of ontological tension ∇U, defined as the mediator between being (A) and non-being (−A0). This review juxtaposes these constructions, highlighting their shared combinatorial structures, canonical forms, and physical implications. We demonstrate that (i) the blow-up of associahedra into cosmohedra mirrors the enhancement of Grassmannian cells into Xk,n; (ii) both exhibit hierarchical “Russian-doll” facets encoding multi-scale factorizations; and (iii) ∇U offers a physical interpretation of cosmohedral facet inequalities, testable via cosmic void statistics. Embedding cosmohedra within the Chaos-Polytope suggests a unified positive geometry bridging scattering amplitudes, cosmological correlators, and ontological dynamics.

This article explores the convergence between Meta-Monism, rooted in the Conflict-Impulse Moment (KMI), and the scattering amplitudes program, exemplified by Nima Arkani-Hamed’s positive geometry framework. Both prioritize impulse space over coordinate space, structuring chaos via positive polytopes (Xk,n in KMI, amplituhedron in amplitudes) and encoding dynamics through boundary symmetries (spherical harmonics in KMI, celestial CFT in amplitudes). Tools like BCFW recursion and dLog-forms model ∇U-dynamics, predicting cosmic voids and black holes. Observational tests align with SDSS-DR7 void distributions (∆crit = 0.78 ± 0.02, R 2 = 0.93) via χ 2 -fitting. Future research includes quantum formalization, holographic dualities, and cosmological tests with DESI/Euclid.

We revisit the “tired-light’’ idea in a framework that contains only one fundamental entity: a scalar tension field U(x,t). A photon is described as a self-sustained soliton whose energy slowly drains through gravitational back-reaction. This single Lagrangian yields two limiting ageing laws  ω̇ = – β ω²  (internal self-gravity)  ω̇ = – γ ω  (external viscous drag) A global fit to the absence of 0.3–7 keV emission from JWST galaxies at z ≃ 9–11 sets the coefficients to β = 1.4 × 10⁻²⁹ and γ = 2.0 × 10⁻¹⁷ s⁻¹. Both laws reproduce the (1+z) time-dilation of Type-Ia supernovae, the strong-lens delays of RX J1131-1231, and the 2.7 K stability of the CMB, while they diverge for high-z γ-ray bursts, future Lynx X-ray stacks and laboratory X-ray beams. A general power-law fit gives an exponent n = 1.76 ± 0.08 (with n = 1 or 2 as analytic edges). Explicit falsification thresholds are provided for SVOM/Theseus (detection of > 0.5 MeV photons at z > 12), Lynx (Lₓ > 10⁴² erg s⁻¹ at z > 9), PIXIE (|dT_CMB/dt| > 10⁻⁴ K Gyr⁻¹) and a 1 km synchrotron tube (Δω/ω ≈ 5 × 10⁻¹⁵). Current data therefore do not rule out photon ageing; they only falsify the non-evolving photon presumed by standard cosmology. Upcoming missions and a feasible laboratory experiment can determine which ageing law—if any—governs the fate of light.

We revisit the “tired-light’’ idea in a framework that contains only one fundamental entity: a scalar tension field U(x,t). A photon is described as a self-sustained soliton whose energy slowly drains through gravitational back-reaction. This single Lagrangian yields two limiting ageing laws  ω̇ = – β ω²  (internal self-gravity)  ω̇ = – γ ω  (external viscous drag) A global fit to the absence of 0.3–7 keV emission from JWST galaxies at z ≃ 9–11 sets the coefficients to β = 1.4 × 10⁻²⁹ and γ = 2.0 × 10⁻¹⁷ s⁻¹. Both laws reproduce the (1+z) time-dilation of Type-Ia supernovae, the strong-lens delays of RX J1131-1231, and the 2.7 K stability of the CMB, while they diverge for high-z γ-ray bursts, future Lynx X-ray stacks and laboratory X-ray beams. A general power-law fit gives an exponent n = 1.76 ± 0.08 (with n = 1 or 2 as analytic edges). Explicit falsification thresholds are provided for SVOM/Theseus (detection of > 0.5 MeV photons at z > 12), Lynx (Lₓ > 10⁴² erg s⁻¹ at z > 9), PIXIE (|dT_CMB/dt| > 10⁻⁴ K Gyr⁻¹) and a 1 km synchrotron tube (Δω/ω ≈ 5 × 10⁻¹⁵). Current data therefore do not rule out photon ageing; they only falsify the non-evolving photon presumed by standard cosmology. Upcoming missions and a feasible laboratory experiment can determine which ageing law—if any—governs the fate of light.

We propose a simple ontological framework that redefines dimensions not as abstract coordinates, but as stages in the formation of difference. Based on the logic of ∇U—the field of tension between distinguishable and indistinguishable—we count 11 dimensions: 9 for space (three planes, each defined by three points), and 2 for time (actual and potential). This structure allows us to reinterpret what string theory calls “vibrations” as real, observable ∇U-fluctuations in physical space, and what loop quantum gravity treats as “nodes” as stable zones of difference. Without invoking compactified dimensions or exotic geometries, we offer a visualizable, ontologically grounded model that unites elements from both major quantum gravity programs.

This work proposes a 5D ontological model of measurement addressing the limitations of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. It introduces a bitemporal structure (T₁ for actuality and T₂ for potentiality), a Fibonacci-based dimensional evolution (1D chaos → 2D time → 3D space → 5D full measurement), and a Golden Metric of Stability (ΦU) that minimizes uncertainty when ΔT = φ · τ₀. Empirical correlations with quantum systems, biology, and culture are explored. Mathematical refinements include a revised commutator incorporating time-discrepancy operators and a φ-corrected Einstein tensor.

This paper presents a foundational ontological framework in which reality is constituted through the conflict of two equal potencies: being (esse) and non-being (non esse). Rather than emerging from substance, symmetry, or causal process, reality arises from the tensional actualization of incompatibility in a singular ontological act—the Conflict-Moment-Impulse (CMI). From this primordial act emerge the three primary modalities: Time (∇T) as a centrifugal vector of dissipation, interpreted as gradient gravity; Space (∇S) as a centripetal vector of concentration, interpreted as gradient antigravity; Matter (∇U) as the field of retained ontological tension between the two. The model is formalized by the equation:   A = A′ + (–A′₀) Here, A represents the stabilized form of conflict, not as synthesis, but as an orthogonal resolution of extremes. The "+" symbol denotes not summation, but the active retention of opposition within the ∇U field. This gives rise to the Law of Conservation of Conflict, which asserts that all observable forms—from quantum fields to galactic structures—are manifestations of stabilized tension, not finalities or identities. Black holes and voids represent the ontological extrema of this system: the maximal tension and minimal resistance conditions, marking the upper and lower bounds of reality respectively. The only true interaction in this framework is modal: all forces, particles, and systems are local expressions of intermodal ∇U-dynamics. What is traditionally understood as gravity, electromagnetism, or strong nuclear force becomes reinterpreted as modal equilibrium states of a single ontological field. Ultimately, the Theory of Meta-Monism calls for a unification of scientific and metaphysical domains under the logic of difference rather than identity. In this view, the universe is not a collection of things, but a living field of difference, continuously balancing and re-balancing its internal asymmetries. This ontological approach provides not only an explanatory foundation for physics and cosmology, but also ethical, epistemological, and aesthetic dimensions grounded in the stability of differential tension.

The Stern–Gerlach experiment is widely interpreted as a paradigmatic quantum measurement: discrete spin states emerge from an initially unpolarized atomic beam. However, this interpretation rests on the assumption of a "neutral" initial state, ignoring background field effects. This paper presents a reinterpretation based on the ontological framework of Meta-Monism, where reality is structured by gradients of ontological tension (denoted as ∇U) between Being (A) and Non-Being (–A₀). In this view, measurement does not generate difference but amplifies a pre-existing structured potential. We explore how this model integrates with quantum field theory (QFT), thermodynamics, and experimental extensions. We conclude that measureme

Meta-monism may appear as a radically new ontological proposal. However, its radicalism does not stem from nihilistic rupture but from a profound synthesis of philosophical traditions, reinterpreted through the framework of retained conflict (KMI) and the gradient of differentiation (∇U). This article demonstrates how the core ideas of meta-monism are rooted in ancient Greek, dialectical, processual, and poststructuralist thought. Its strength lies precisely in its ability to connect and reconfigure these lineages into a novel ontological paradigm.

This paper presents a meta-ontological account of emergence within the framework of Meta-Monism, where reality is constituted not by substances or interactions, but by gradients of ontological difference (∇U). We argue that emergence is not the spontaneous generation of novelty but the stabilization of differential tension between actuality (A) and unrealized potential (–A₀). By reformulating emergence as a retention threshold within an ontological field, we provide a coherent alternative to both reductionist and pluralist paradigms. Emergence is modeled not as a physical event, but as the temporal fixation of asymmetry within a bounded range of ∇U intensity. Implications for physics, metaphysics, and consciousness studies are explored.

We present a novel ontological formulation of quantum field theory in which fields, particles, and even spacetime itself emerge from a fundamental tension of ontological difference, denoted ∇U. This field is not embedded within space and time—it generates them by differentiating between mutually exclusive possibilities: to be (+A) and not to be (–A₀). The act of separation is governed by the impulse moment—a trans-spatiotemporal event that establishes the condition for stabilized form. On this foundation, we construct a ∇U-based quantum field theory and extend it to a string ontology, where strings are interpreted as seams—boundaries between impulse moments—within the ∇U-field. We discuss the physical predictions, conceptual consequences, and the framework’s ability to unify gravity, quantum theory, and emergent spacetime under a single ontological principle.

This paper introduces a cosmological model grounded in meta-monism, in which antigravity is not a repulsive force but the ontological condition of form retention. We define antigravity as the gradient of ontological tension (∇U) sustaining difference against collapse. In contrast, gravity represents the dissolution of form. Rejecting both the Big Bang and cosmic expansion, the model explains matter emergence through equilibrium ∇U-zones and identifies voids as active antigravitational structures. The same principle scales from atoms to galaxies, offering a unified ontological framework for cosmic structure.