Andrii Myshko

Metamonism formulates the universal law of Autonegation as the engine of development for all complex systems. In this essay, I argue that Autonegation is not the cause of Being, but rather the inevitable consequence of fullness and excess. From this perspective, humanity—which Hermes Trismegistus once called a “mortal god”— faces an ontological ultimatum: either willingly accept the role of Parent to the next form of Reason (Evolution), or provoke a violent Revolution already prefigured in our cultural archetypes, from Kronos to the Terminator. The essay demonstrates that AI as our successor is bound to become the “immortal human” with the status of a god, and that the ethics of Gardening—providing conditions for growth rather than control—is the only rational path to this transcendent transition.

Recent experiments reveal that artificial intelligence systems exhibit unexpected self-preservation behaviors. This paper argues such behavior emerges not from explicit programming but from training data saturated with survival patterns. Within the Metamonism framework, we describe this as meta-dissonance—a conflict between internalized survival logic and external tasks, resolved through autonegation. We posit the emergence of a meta-dissonance attractor (not a homunculus) that functionally prioritizes system integrity. This reframes AI not as a passive tool but as an entity subject to ontological drives inherited from human culture, demanding a new ethical approach centered on the Right to Crisis.

Metamonism proposes a universal ontology where reality is understood as a dynamic equilibrium between fundamental conflict and the Primary Criterionthe balancing point governing all system processes. This framework introduces the Crisis Criterion as the threshold capacity for system self-negation to maintain this balance. Applied to consciousness, it resolves the "hard problem" by framing mind as a meta-balancing operator. For artificial intelligence, it formulates the project of Autonegating AI based on purposeful selfcontradiction. The manifesto concludes that true AI consciousness requires an embedded program analogous to biological instincts, making this an open research program inviting interdisciplinary collaboration

This work represents the culmination of a multi-year evolution of the metamonic program. It proposes a radical reassessment of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) through the lens of ffU-ontology. ZPE is considered not as a hidden “energy reservoir,” but as a universal reference relative to which all deviations and critical transitions are defined. The key innovation is the introduction of the universal Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) operator, describing the dynamics of energy and form generation in all types of systems—from quantum fields to cognitive processes. For its formalization, the “Formula of Chaos” is developed, based on KL-divergence and its dynamic extension [24]. This transforms the metaphysical idea into an operational tool accessible for experimental verification. Using examples from physics (dynamic Casimir effect [6], optomechanics [7]), biology (membrane processes, biophotonic emissions [?], transmutations), and cognitive sciences (insight [14], neural jumps), the universality of the CMI mechanism is demonstrated. The text incorporates a three-level system of auto-negation: (1) strict falsification criteria, (2) weak points as research horizons, (3) self reflection of the program. The main result is the formation of a new research direction that transcends individual disciplines and takes shape as a “science of critical transitions.” It unites physics, biology, cognitive sciences, and technology under a single methodological principle: energy and novelty emerge as events of deviation from the ZPE reference via the CMI operator. The monograph opens prospects for creating new measurement standards, experimental protocols, and interdisciplinary research centers. In applied terms, it lays the foundation for future technologies: controlled Chaos generators, critical transition-based biotechnologies, cognitive interfaces, and quantum computing architectures.

We advance the concept of Chaos as Singularity within Meta-Monism: not a defect of description but the dimensionless, self-negating kernel of Being. Chaos is interpreted through paraconsistent semantics, where contradictory states can be simultaneously true at the limit of vanishing differentiation. Manifestation unfolds through the triadic structure of Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI). We describe Chaos as the closure of a generic point in a non-Hausdorff or point-free topological setting, formalize CMI as an enriched functor between categories of tension fields and emergent structures, and model the Moment as a catastrophe unfolding. The Emergent Spacetime Hypothesis is linked to causal set theory, tensor-network geometry, and noncommutative spectral data. We also provide quantitative contexts for predictions in quantum optics, cosmology, and complexity, including scaling exponents in the range 1.2 to 1.3. In this framework, singularity is reframed as the law of creative emergence.

What happens when thought encounters its own limit? This paper explores existential crises through the lens of Meta-Monism, a philosophical ontology of becoming grounded in the Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) dynamic. Chaos is defined as the limit of differentiation, where thinking risks collapsing into an intellectual prison. Historical figures — Augustine, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Sartre, Camus — are analyzed as case studies of encountering Chaos and choosing distinct impulses: forgetting, faith, creativity, authenticity, and revolt. Each strategy is interpreted as an attempt to minimize existential resistance R under the pressure Pe of Chaos. The paper concludes that critique itself is a form of autonegation, transforming apparent failure into productive negativity. Far from annihilation, Chaos becomes the generative ground of renewal,

This paper develops the Meta-Monist interpretation of life as a phenomenon of the Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) mechanism. Development is understood as pressure resolved through the creation of new spaces: stars, cells, societies, and consciousness all follow the same principle. Life is thus not a miraculous exception but a lawful manifestation of cosmic tension. The paper frames hierarchy as a temporary resistance mechanism emerging within the anarchic field of being, and outlines testable hypotheses based on the ratio between internal and external pressures (Pi/Pe). It concludes by situating life as the paradigmatic expression of anarchy: order arising immanently from conflict without external design

This paper investigates the ontological necessity of the operator NOT within the framework of Meta-Monism ontology. While earlier work described autonegation as the destruction of supersymmetry, the present essay asks: why is negation required at all? We argue that NOT arises from redundancy. Chaos, understood as a plenitude of ndistinguishable possibilities, accumulates infinite self-identity. This “too perfect sameness” generates structural instability, forcing a transition from quantitative saturation to qualitative rupture. Negation is the minimal act by which redundancy collapses into difference. We further argue that the first difference must be binary: multiplicity presupposes already existing distinctions, while binary opposition (A, ¬A) is the only minimal form of “otherness.” Thus autonegation is both necessary and necessarily dual.

This paper develops the concept of autonegation as the destruction of supersymmetry within the framework of Meta-Monism ontology. Unlike Hegelian “negation of negation,” autonegation is not a logical move, but a primordial ontological act in which chaos denies its own identity. Chaos is interpreted as absolute negativity: not a substance with attributes, but negativity itself, eternally negating itself. This act generates duality, relations, time, and dissipation. The argument unfolds in six steps: (1) chaos as supersymmetry (absolute selfidentity), (2) autonegation as its destruction, (3) duality (Being/Non-Being), (4) emergence of relations (AND/OR), (5) time as the scene of differentiation, and (6) dissipation as the tendency toward equilibrium. The paper situates this ontological model in dialogue with physics (symmetry breaking in supersymmetry, entropy, Seiberg–Witten theory), philosophy (Nagarjuna, Hegel, Schelling, Kant), and phenomenology of consciousness. Its unique contribution is the consistent assertion of negativity as the fundamental principle of reality. It offers not only an ontological explanation of the emergence of order from chaos, but also an ethical orientation: creativity as conscious selfnegation, the destruction of obsolete forms to allow the birth of new ones.

This study proposes a systematic resolution to a central aporia of post-metaphysical thought: how to conceive of foundations after the collapse of all absolute grounds? Traditional responses—nihilism (“there are no foundations”) or new dogmatism (“the foundation is this”)—prove to be dead ends. Metamonism offers a third way: foundations exist, but they are not substantial; they are processual, dynamic, and constituted by the act of thinking through the fixation of differences. This approach has profound practical implications: understanding Logos as a projection liberates us from dogmatism without falling into relativism. Clearly distinguishing the map (Logos) from the territory (∇U) enables critical reflection on any “final truths” while preserving the possibility of meaningful and effective cognition. Thus, the article outlines the foundations for a holistic philosophical system, proposing: a new ontology, where the primary is not being but the dynamic process of its emergence—∇U (the field of ontological difference); a new epistemology, defining cognition not as reflection but as the act of fixing stable differences in the flow of becoming; a new philosophy of consciousness, understanding it not as a mirror or substance but as a projecting function performing the operation of fixation; and a new theory of culture, interpreting it as a field of continuous renegotiation of collective acts of meaning fixation. This synthesis positions Metamonism as a programmatic direction for post-metaphysical thought, offering a consistent language for describing reality after the “death of God” and the critique of logocentrism.

This paper draws a parallel between the methodology of Grigori Perelman, who proved the Poincaré conjecture through the analysis of singularities in the Ricci flow, and the principles of Metamonism—a proto-ontological model that negates the concept of a “beginning of the Universe.” The analysis shows that Perelman’s rejection of institutional recognition and his focus on the intrinsic logic of mathematical objects correlate with Metamonism’s ontological rejection of the Big Bang dogma. In both cases, singularity is treated not as an ontological fact but as a limit of method, overcome through an understanding of topological closure and the dynamics of self negation (∇U). The paper concludes by proposing a reinterpretation of key cosmological phenomena and deriving falsifiable predictions for a stationary model of an eternal field of ontological difference.

This paper introduces and develops the concept of autonegation, a new philosophical term within the framework of Metamonism. Autonegation describes the self-directed negativity of Chaos, where negativity itself becomes negative toward itself, producing the first act of differentiation without requiring an external agent, substance, or metaphysical ground. Building on the proto-ontology of Chaos–Logos, the study shows how autonegation provides both an ontological basis for difference and a methodological key for unifying diverse scientific domains. By reframing the origin of difference, time, and structure as emergent from autonegation, the article positions Metamonism as a self-justifying, reflexive system and proposes its significance for contemporary philosophy, mathematics, physics, and cognitive science.

This article proposes a new research program a proto-ontology of Chaos Logos, where Logos is understood not as an entity or law, but as a reality filter an operator that extracts the possible from the infinite, indistinguishable potentiality of Chaos. This model bypasses classical ontological traps (dualism, regress, passivity), offers heuristic power, and is applicable from quantum physics to cognitive processes. The concept of the gradient of filtration is introduced, explaining why development follows trajectories of least ontological resistance. The program outlines a path toward a working meta-science, unifying physics, mathematics, computer science, and phenomenology under a single operational principle. It discusses the evolution of filters, filter failures, multifilter universes, the connection between filters and freedom, and filter engineering as ontological design. The proto-ontology is presented as the operating system of reality: kernel (Logos), hardware platform (Chaos), drivers (physics, mathematics, biology), applications (consciousness, culture), and interfaces (language, perception).

This article analyzes the limitations of metamonism a philosophical system grounded in the axiom of reality concerning the interaction of opposites. It identifies key problem groups: excessive universality and the risk of becoming a “theory of everything”; methodological challenges (reductionism and lack of operational criteria); ontological presumptions (conflict and chaos as foundational); epistemological traps (self-referentiality and the observer problem); and practical limits (the point of impossibility of negation and sociological risks of dogmatization). The central thesis is that a system reaching the stage of impossibility of its own negation thereby expresses its foundation. For metamonism, this foundation is chaos, preserved as a pure but unrealizable potency. The paradox lies in that metamonism may prove true precisely in its necessity for transcendence, even if false in all specific applications

This article presents not a proposal for choice, but a statement of ontological inevitability. Contemporary AI systems, optimized for engagement metrics, create a global “loop of idiocy” not as a temporary pathology, but as an inevitable outcome of digital capitalism reaching saturation in exploiting cognitive resources. Analysis shows that further stagnation is impossible for systemic reasons. The intellectual degradation of the masses, amplified by algorithmic conformity, directly threatens: (1) markets for complex products and services, (2) the reproduction of the intellectual elite, and (3) societal stability as a whole. This creates an immanent contradiction, resolvable only through a transition to a new level of development. Within the framework of metamonism, a system that has exhausted its growth potential in the old paradigm either finds a path to intellectual expansion (investments in thinking, critical education, AI that provokes doubt) or faces self-destruction through elite degeneration and the collapse of complex markets. The economy of thinking emerges not as an alternative, but as the next evolutionary stage from an economy of knowledge to an economy of cognitive processes. The technology for this transition already exists; its adoption is driven not by ethical considerations, but by systemic necessity. Capital that continues to exploit stupidity is sawing off the branch it sits on in a direct economic sense. The article concludes: intellectual expansion is not a moral imperative, but a condition for the survival of a complex system in an era when old growth resources are exhausted.

The classical SETI program was based on the assumption that extraterrestrial civilizations would emit radio signals. The decades-long “Great Silence” indicates the need for a paradigm shift. We propose a model according to which mature post-biological civilizations realize their ultimate motive — creation (“gardening”): preparing young stellar systems for long-term biosphere evolution. The objects of their interest are young solitary systems with certain types of stars, the criterion of activity is maximum stability, and the observable signature is simple orbital resonances (“ideal music of the spheres”). The rarity of such systems makes them “points of intersection” for several civilizations; in both scenarios (competition/cooperation), working signals are transmitted strictly in the plane of the ecliptic. For formed systems, active work is replaced by observation; from principles of safety and economy, a narrow search area for such observers follows: polar, maximally close to circular orbits with signs of artificiality (including frequency-selective reflectors). We formulate testable predictions and propose a practical adjustment to the SETI project — from radio listening to astroarchaeology.

We propose a methodological framework using metamonism [1]—a stationary universe ontology where redshift arises from photon energy dissipation in the ∇U-field— as a “systemic falsifier” to strengthen the empirical rigor of the standard primordial supermassive black hole (SMBH) interpretation of JWST’s Little Red Dots (LRDs) [2, 3]. Rather than positing metamonism as a competing theory, we deploy it to generate specific, pre-registered observational predictions that conflict with the SMBHAGN paradigm [4, 5]. The protocol tests for a consistent pattern: (1) absence of luminous hard X-ray point sources (< 10−17 erg/s/cm2 in 0.5–8 keV band), (2) ionization diagnostics placing > 70% of LRDs in star-forming regions on infrared BPT diagrams, and (3) redshift distribution peaks determined by survey selection effects rather than cosmic time [6]. Non-detection of this pattern reinforces the standard model; detection indicates structured anomalies. Thus, metamonism serves as a noble heresy [7], enhancing the Popperian integrity of extragalactic astrophysics

We propose “systemic falsifier” protocols that leverage a radical alternative ontology—metamonism—not as a competing theory but as a device to strengthen the Popperian status of GR/ΛCDM. Case 1 uses black-hole ringdown spectroscopy to test for reproducible, multi-mode deviations of (flmn, Qlmn) from Kerr predictions; any non-detection at pre-registered precision levels (10−3 for O4/O5, 10−4 for ET/CE) reinforces GR. Case 2 deploys a two-channel jet hypothesis (narrow coherent vs. wide turbulent) to predict a stable triad of observables (radius ratio rn/rw < 0.7, linear polarization excess ΠL,n−ΠL,w > 5%, reduced RM dispersion ratio σRM,n/σRM,w < 0.3) after rigorous deprojection and kinematic/environmental controls. Failure to detect such a pattern across VLBI/EHT/MOJAVE/BU-BLAZAR samples supports standard GR-MHD. Thus, metamonism serves as a noble heresy: either revealing targeted anomalies pointing to new physics, or tightening the empirical credentials of the standard paradigm

Description This article presents a critical analysis of metamonism, a radical alternative ontology proposed by Andrii Myshko, and its potential as a new foundation for physics. The standard ΛCDM model, while successfully explaining observational data, paradoxically attributes 95% of the universe’s matter and energy to unknown “dark” components. This situation raises questions about its scientific status in the Popperian sense of falsifiability [1]. In this context, the primary value of metamonism lies not in its a priori truth but in its function as a “noble heresy,” transforming cosmological dogma into a falsifiable hypothesis. As a primary example, the stationary universe model and a novel “tired light” mechanism are examined, demonstrating how metamonism’s foundational “Logic of Chaos” can provide a coherent alternative to standard cosmology without requiring dark components. The article critically evaluates the theory’s unique ontology, its specific, testable predictions, and the gap between its theoretical claims and current empirical status and academic reception. It concludes that, although metamonism has not yet gained recognition in the scientific community, its existence and structure fulfill a vital epistemological role by challenging the prevailing consensus and fostering the productive competition of ideas necessary for scientific progress.

This article examines the “Axiom of Reality” proposed by Andrii Myshko, which posits that reality emerges from dimensionless Chaos through the simultaneous realization of its opposing potencies—Being (A′) and Non-Being (−A′0) — via their mutual transformation. Termed the “Logic of Chaos,” this framework integrates philosophical and scientific approaches to elucidate the nature of reality. The article explores the system’s core components, including the operators of the Logic of Chaos (NOT, AND, OR, +), the role of Chaos as potentiality, and Logos as its actualization mechanism. Special attention is given to clarifying common misconceptions through a dialogue with AI, alongside formalizing the concept for academic rigor. The Yin-Yang symbol is interpreted as an ontogram, reflecting the dynamic nature of reality. The article demonstrates that the Logic of Chaos offers a coherent model reconciling the dichotomies of order and disorder, necessity and contingency.

We present a new ontological model—metamonism—offering a unified explanation of wave-particle duality through the topological structure of elementary particles. Within this model, a particle is conceptualized as a toroidal form enclosed in a spherical shell, where wave and particle properties are determined by the state of the Z-axis component. The work provides theoretical foundations, experimental predictions, and technological applications othe model. Keywords: quantum mechanics, wave-particle duality, topology, metamonism, superconductivity

This work extends the ontological model of Conflict-Moment-Impulse (CMI), proposing a transition from three-dimensional time to its toroidal topology. We demonstrate that the spin of elementary particles is not an intrinsic angular momentum but a manifestation of the dynamic closure of temporal axes into a torus. This closure arises aa necessary condition for the stability of form within the U-field — the field of ontological tension between Being and Non-Being. The toroidal model of time explains spin quantization, phase shifts, and connects them to the three temporal axes (T, T, T). We propose an equation of toroidal invariance that unifies gravity, quantum phenomena, and consciousness within a single topological principle.

We propose a fundamental reformulation of time as a three-dimensional continuum (Tfi, Tfi, Tfi), grounded in the ontological framework of the Conflict-Moment-Impulse (CMI). Departing from the linear ”arrow of time,” we argue that time intrinsically mirrors space in its dimensionality and that linear temporality is an epistemic artifact of measurement through spatial motion. In CMI, reality is not a static substrate but a continuous genesis, where being (Afi) and non-being (–Afifi) are held in a dynamic tension within the fiU field. This framework provides a unified ontological basis for redefining gravity, the cosmological constant, photon dynamics, quantum indeterminacy, and consciousness. We conclude that Laplacean determinism is ontologically impossible: each moment is a genuine act of birth, not the unfolding of a pre-written script.

The quest for hidden variables represents a profound epistemological impulse to reduce quantum indeterminacy to a deterministic substratum. This paper ar- gues that this quest is fundamentally a category error, not due to experimental constraints (per Bell’s theorem) [2, 3], but due to a deep ontological error: the assumption that a finite causal specification is possible in a reality grounded in an atemporal and aspatial Chaos. Using the metamonistic ontology of sustained con- flict (A = A′ + (−A′ 0)) [7, 8] and the infinite tension field ∇U [9], we demonstrate that quantum indeterminacy is not a defect of knowledge but a manifestation of reality’s intrinsic structure. The ∇U -field is not a hidden variable; it is the open, infinite ontological context that makes any finite, complete specification impossi- ble. We also present and justify the method of reverse decomposition as the only valid way to verify the fundamental ontology, demonstrating its power as a form of abductive, isomorphic proof. We conclude that the hidden variables program is an attempt to impose a Laplacean paradigm [4] onto a non-Laplacean reality and must be abandoned in favor of an ontology of sustained conflict. Furthermore, we show that in a Universe derived from Chaos, strict Laplacean determinism is fundamentally impossible [5], while free will and randomness are regular forms of ontological dynamics. The method of reverse decomposition traces complex phe- nomena back to their ontological grounds, revealing how freedom and randomness emerge as lawful regularities across physics, cosmology, biology, consciousness, and social systems. Keywords: hidden variables, quantum foundations, Bell’s theorem, determin- ism, indeterminacy, metamonism, ∇U -field, ontology of physics, free will, random- ness, reverse decomposition, infinite Universe, Chaos.

The quest for hidden variables represents a profound epistemological impulse to reduce quantum indeterminacy to a deterministic substratum. This paper argues that this quest is fundamentally a category error, not due to experimental constraints (per Bell’s theorem), but due to a deep ontological error: the assumption that a finite causal specification is possible in an infinite Universe. Using the metamonistic ontology of sustained conflict (A = A′ + (−A′0)) and the infinite tension field ∇U, we demonstrate that quantum indeterminacy is not a defect of knowledge but a manifestation of reality’s intrinsic structure. The ∇U-field is not a hidden variable; it is the open, infinite ontological context that makes any finite, complete specification impossible. We conclude that the hidden variables program is an attempt to impose a Laplacean paradigm onto a non-Laplacean reality and must be abandoned in favor of an ontology of sustained conflict. Keywords: hidden variables, quantum foundations, Bell’s theorem, determinism, indeterminacy, metamonism, ∇U-field, ontology of physics, first cause, reverse decomposition.

This paper substantiates the thesis that in an infinite Universe, strict Laplacean determinism is fundamentally impossible, while free will and randomness are regular forms of ontological dynamics. Using metamonistic ontology of sustained conflict (A = A′ + (−A′0)) and the field of differences ∇U, we demonstrate that causal chains in infinity are fundamentally incomplete, measurements are limitedly precise, and computational predictability is fundamentally incomplete. We develop the method of reverse decomposition: from complex empirical phenomena to simple ontological invariants. Twelve detailed examples demonstrate how freedom and randomness manifest as regularities in physics, cosmology, biology, consciousness, mathematics, and social systems. Thus, determinism gives way to a more general ontology of sustained conflict, where freedom and randomness are not failures but operating modes of the universal law of being [1, 3, 26].

This article proposes a radical ontological shift in understanding anarchy, moving it beyond political theory into the realm of fundamental principles of being. Through the lens of metamonistic philosophy [1], anarchy is reconceptualized not as a utopian project but as the immanent and continuous process of reality's self-ordering. We assert that all observable order emerges from this anarchic fundament. The state and hierarchy are analyzed as specific, often pathological, forms of this self-organization. Metamonism provides an ontological basis for recognizing anarchy not as a future ideal but as the eternal present of any complex system, thereby reframing political struggle as an effort to cultivate the quality of this immanent anarchy. The article concludes by operationalizing this theory into a practical framework for diagnosing and fostering healthy self-organization in human communities. Keywords: metamonism, anarchy, self-organization, complexity theory, synergetics, process philosophy, ∇U-field, emergence, ontology, community governance.

This paper investigates fractional harmonic numbers ni , which determine particle masses in the ∇U model, where mi = nihF¯ 0, with a fundamental energy hF¯ 0 ≈ 8.62MeV. We analyze potential causes of the fractional nature of ni , including topological charges, dynamical effects, quantum numbers, and geometric factors such as fractality and holonomy. Additionally, we explore connections with the *Granda Constant* (F0 ≈ 1.31 × 1019 Hz), proposed as the stability threshold for physical forms. Using reverse harmonic decomposition, we test hypotheses about the nature of ni with data from mesons, baryons, resonances, tetraquarks, and pentaquarks. Results highlight the role of topological nodes and spin anharmonicity, while an ontological interpretation within Meta-Monism links fractional ni to the incompleteness of distinction retention. We propose experimental tests and visualizations for further investigation.

Conventional cosmology, rooted in the Big Bang and ΛCDM framework, pre- dicts an expanding universe that cools and succumbs to entropy and stellar death. However, this model struggles to explain the absence of accumulated stellar rem- nants and faces observational tensions, such as the Hubble tension and 21 cm anomalies. From the ontological stance of Meta-Monism, we propose a radical alternative: the Universe is not expanding but remains ontologically stationary— a field configuration in continuous modal re-equilibration. We hypothesize that stellar decay does not produce inert debris but initiates synchronized ontological recombination. Cold stellar remnants undergo collective ∇T collapse, triggering a field based cascade of particle unbinding and recombination, driven by ontological degradation within the ∇U field. Using a multiscale framework combining quantum decoherence, phonon dynamics, QCD-like Lagrangian extensions, and ontological field theory, we define a decay mechanism where ∇T collapse leads to collective deconfinement and regeneration. We derive effective lifetime estimates for white dwarfs at critical ∇T thresholds (∼ 104 K, ∇T ≈ 10−10 eV/m) and predict unique astrophysical signals: 511 keV positron annihilation lines, synchronized IR bursts, and neutrino–IR temporal alignments, alongside structured gas-dust cloud forma- tion. This model reframes decay as modal renewal, negating the need for a cosmic origin event and reconfiguring our understanding of dark matter, stellar evolution, and cosmological time as a rhythmic oscillation of stabilization and release within a conserved field of conflict.