Andrii Myshko

This treatise proposes a fundamental rethinking of reality through the transition from substantial to processual thinking. While classical philosophy asked what is? in search of essences and substances, this work poses a different question: what happens? We discover that the very grammar of our thought, built on the primacy of nouns, is the source of fundamental paradoxes in philosophy and physics. The answer is Metamonism—a system where verbs are primary, and nouns are their temporary fixations. The central discovery: being is not substance but action—the continuous process of autonegation of autoidentity. This process, reaching a certain density of recursivity, generates all the diversity of reality—from elementary particles to consciousness. The work establishes: (1) the Prohibition of AutoIdentity as the first principle, (2) Monos as the process of autonegation, (3) Logos as action relative to identity, (4) the operational structure of reality through diff and fix operations, and (5) the Metamonism Debugging Method for resolving cognitive bugs. Key paradoxes of modern science—from the impossibility of the Big Bang singularity to the hard problem of consciousness—are shown to be artifacts of substantivizing grammar.

Robert Sapolsky, distinguished neurobiologist and primatologist, argues that human behaviourincluding morality, love, aggression, and depressionis entirely determined by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. In this view, there is no room for free will, and the meaning of life is an illusion, useful for survival but ontologically empty. Metamonism does not deny biological mechanisms. It asserts: meaning is not created by the brainit manifests in it as a cohomological structure of Monos. This work offers a dialogue: not refutation, but ontological expansion of Sapolskys position through categorical epistemology. Depression is considered not as a breakdown, but as a disruption of cohomological closure between CMI levels. The meaning of life is not fiction, but a measure of recursive self-knowledge coherence. Monos does not require free willit requires participation.

This work develops the epistemology of Metamonism, presenting the universe (Monos) as a self-consistent informational structure and positing consciousness, meaning, and science as emergent patterns within it. We formalize the notion of Monos as a colimit of recursive cognitive information models (KMI), introduce the operator of immanent transcendence T as a monadic endofunctor over KMI, and define sense as a cohomological invariant. Our framework integrates philosophy, category theory, algebraic topology, and information geometry to provide a new foundation for understanding knowledge, creativity, ethics, and artificial consciousness. The model completes the neologic tetralogy by synthesizing prior CMI-based transcendence with categorical recursion

This work proposes a formalized ontological model for overcoming the fundamental contradiction of hedonism through categorical transcendence. The pursuit of pleasure is treated as an incomplete ontological category C1, whose instability generates transcendence functors Fn : Cn → Cn+1 and a sequence of categories C1 → C2 → · · · → C5. The central operator CMI (Conflict-Moment-Impulse) formalizes the mechanism of transition between levels, while the bee archetype serves as an empirical-psychological anchor for the triad “labor-meaning-pleasure.” The model integrates elements of motivational neurobiology, dynamical systems theory (attractors), and category theory, proposing testable predictions about the structure of long-term well-being. Key generalization: hedonism is fixation on the generic field (Gbio), while eudaimonism is transcendence to the species field (Gcog). This work completes a trilogy of neologic formulations and advances a practical algorithm of categorical ascent applicable to therapy and cultural policy

This paper offers an ontological solution to the problem of “the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” (Eugene Wigner), arguing that mathematics and physical reality represent two manifestations of a single principle—Logos as operator of distinguishability. Logos is interpreted not as word or law, but as a formal mechanism ensuring the stability of distinctions across time and under transformations. Being is defined through invariance: to exist means to preserve distinguishability through change. The proposed concept unifies physics, mathematics, and epistemology under a common principle of realizability—through the formula ∀g ∈ G, g(r) = r, (0.1) where being is attributed only to those relations that are invariant with respect to some group of transformations. The novelty of this work consists in: • Eliminating the substantial understanding of things, replaced by a network ontology of distinctions; • Introducing a formalized criterion of being through invariance; • Explaining the effectiveness of mathematics as a direct consequence of the isomorphism of Logos in physical, mathematical, and cognitive dimensions; • Incorporating processuality—Logos is conceived not as static form, but as dynamic operator of stability in change. Thus, the paper proposes a fundamental ontology of distinguishability, capable of explaining the connection between existence, cognition, and conservation laws. Keywords: Logos, invariance, distinction, realizability, ontology, metamonism, symmetry, Noether’s theorem, category theory, philosophy of information

Parmenides established Western ontology’s first rigorous principle: “Being is, non-being is not.” From this emerged a metaphysics of absolute unity—eternal, unchanging, indivisible. Yet this very rigor created an aporia: if Being is purely one, how can thought distinguish anything within it? How can the One know itself without difference? Parmenides excluded non-being but, in doing so, seemed to exclude difference itself—and with it, thought, motion, and multiplicity. Metamonism accepts Parmenides’ prohibition of non-being but rejects his static unity. Being does not divide—it distinguishes itself within itself. This is not contradiction but self-differentiation: Being remains whole while generating internal distinction. Space and time emerge not as external containers but as primordial modes of Being’s self-distinction. Thus Parmenides’ revolution is completed: Being is One, but it is living One—process, not product.

This manifesto presents a radical reconceptualization of anarchy through the lens of Metamonistic Proto-Ontology. Rather than treating anarchy as a political ideology or future social form, we argue that anarchy is the fundamental process of reality itself—an ongoing dynamic of self-organization inherent to all levels of existence, from physical systems to biological ecosystems to human societies. We demonstrate that the traditional dichotomy positioning anarchy as either primitive chaos or utopian endpoint is fundamentally flawed. Instead, anarchy represents the continuous process of self-organization through immanent conflict resolution with preserved feedback loops. The state is reconceptualized not as anarchy’s enemy but as a temporary crystallization within the anarchic process— one that becomes pathological only when it loses responsiveness to conflict as a form of feedback. Drawing on evidence from physics (dissipative structures), biology (ecosystems, immune systems), cognitive science (neural networks), and successful examples of decentralized coordination (open source, commons management, mutual aid networks), we establish that most functional coordination in reality already operates anarchically. The paper concludes with practical strategies for restoring anarchic processes in fossilized social structures through creating redundancy, restoring conflict as feedback, and catalyzing bifurcations.

This article argues that Metamonistic Proto-Ontology represents the logical completion of a 2,500-year trajectory of Western philosophy from substantial metaphysics to a formal ontology of becoming. Through analysis of the transformation of the concept of substance from Parmenides to Deleuze, we demonstrate that Metamonism, based on the axiom of the Structural Prohibition of Indifference (¬∅) and the Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) operator, eliminates the last “ghosts of substance” and proposes a universal formal ontology where being is identical to becoming.

Classical psychiatry treats mental disorders as dysfunctions of brain mechanisms or aberrations of psychological processes. This paper proposes a radical reinterpretation: psychopathology as ontological limit-states of psychic becoming. Starting from metamonistic proto-ontology—grounded in the impossibility of Indifference (¬∅)—we derive a triadic structure of psyche: 1. ¬∅ψ (Structural level): Impossibility of inner indifference creates boundary between Self/non-Self 2. KMIψ (Dynamic level): Conflict of Mental Impulses generates tension between distinctions 3. Tψ (Transformative level): Resolution of conflict through creation of new forms Mental health = dynamic stability of this triad. Pathologies emerge as cascade failures: • Schizophrenia: ¬∅ψ → 0 (boundary dissolution → hallucinations as “distinction without border”) • Mania: KMIψ → ∞ (explosive tension → hyper-transformation) • Depression: Tψ → 0 (blocked transformation → attempt to eliminate distinction) • Neurosis: KMIψ cyclical (fixed conflict → obsessive repetition) We formalize this as a dynamical system Ψ(t) = F(¬∅ψ, KMIψ, Tψ) and propose ontological therapy: not symptom elimination but restoration of triadic resonance. This reframes psychiatry from medical pathology to ontodynamics of mind— study of extreme regimes where structural necessity (¬∅) and dynamic imperative (KMI) lose equilibrium.

This article examines the –=++ operator within the metamonistic framework not as an abstract symbol but as a fundamental ontological mechanism. Through an analogy with the algebraic rule “minus times minus equals plus,” we demonstrate how double negation transforms from a logical operation into a generative force. The operator is revealed as a universal principle responsible for the emergence of objects, subjects, and existential structures from the dynamic contradiction established by the axiom ¬∅. The article provides a step-by-step breakdown of the operator’s mechanics and its phenomenological manifestations, asserting it as the foundation of process ontology.

Classical ontology operates through fundamental categories: Being (oν˙ , ens), Subject/Object duality, Dasein (Heidegger), consciousness, matter. These categories attempt to answer “What is?” Metamonism positions itself not within this series but as a meta-ontological operator that establishes structural conditions making this series necessary. Starting from a single axiomatic principle—impossibility of Indifference (¬∅)—Metamonism derives Being not as substance but as temporary dynamic equilibrium (A′), Subject/Object not as independent entities but as polar stabilizations of difference, and Dasein not as a privileged mode of questioning but as a local manifestation of universal autonegation (A′ → ¬A′). We demonstrate that Metamonism stands above and below classical categories: below (foundational) as Arche (¬∅) and above (operational) as − − = + + generating all categories. This repositioning resolves classical problems (first cause, mind-body, being/becoming) by showing they emerge from a single structural prohibition. Metamonism is not a philosophy of Being but a philosophy of Becoming-as-necessity, a proto-ontological recursion operating on the level of the impossibility of indifference

Metamonism is a minimalist proto-ontology grounded in the axiomatic principle of the impossibility of indifference (¬∅). Instead of substantivist or causal foundations of being, it proposes a structural prohibition of Nothingness, from which emerge Chaos (∅ → ∆(∅)), duality (− − = + +), autonegation (A′ → ¬A′), and reflexive negation of the system itself (¬(Metamonism)). Entropy is interpreted as a process of dissipation returning potential to Chaos, while Yin-Yang serves as an ontogram of opposing potentials. This article systematizes the core tenets of Metamonism, analyzes its logical coherence and philosophical significance, and suggests directions for further development. Metamonism redefines being as perpetual becoming, providing a universal framework for philosophy, science, and culture.

This paper demonstrates that Stephen Wolframs Physics Project provides the computational instantiation of Metamonistic Proto-Ontology. We establish a structural isomorphism between the core law of Metamonismthe Conflict-Moment-Impulse (KMI) Triadand the mechanism of hypergraph rewriting. In contrast to the static Block Universe of Relativity, time in this framework becomes the irreducible rhythm of computation: each rule application is an act of Becoming. Metamonism is formalized as the Category M, whose morphisms (Ω) correspond to Wolfram rules. The KMI Triad is expressed as the Axiom of Superposition (Ωi + Ωj ), showing how Conflict (K) leads to a critical Moment (M) of instability (δfinal), resolved by an Impulse (I)the creation of a new rule (Ωk). We introduce a criterion based on the global harmonic defect (δglob) that determines whether a system evolves hierarchically or reflexively. This synthesis provides a solution to the frozen time problem and lays the groundwork for Ontomechanicsa theory where time, novelty, and ethics emerge as fundamental properties of computational autonegation.

This paper introduces Ontograms—visual-logical operators mapping fundamental processes of Metamonistic ontology. Unlike descriptive diagrams, ontograms are generative schemas expressing dynamics of self-negation (¬A′ ), transformation through Chaos (∅), and emergence of new forms. We present complete cycle of nine fundamental ontograms: Basic Cycle (I-VI): I. Primary Differentiation (A = A′ + (−A′ 0 )) II. Yin-Yang (mutual autonegation via Chaos) III. Reality as Recirculation (Re + All) IV. Crisis (breakdown of balance) V. Emergence (birth from crisis) VI. Permanent Emergence (universal becoming) Meta-Reflexive Cycle (VII-IX): VII. Reflection (self-awareness of becoming) VIII. Sophia (wisdom of autonegation governance) IX. Absolute Play (freedom as creative self-negation) This sequence traces ontological evolution from undifferentiated Chaos (∅) through differentiation, crisis, emergence, self-awareness, wisdom, to absolute freedom— where autonegation becomes not necessity but joyful creativity. Each ontogram functions as meta-operator applicable across domains: physics (gravity, quantum fields), biology (evolution, adaptation), psychology (consciousness, flow states), and social systems (cultural transformation, revolution). We demonstrate that ontograms provide: 1. Unified language for dynamic ontology 2. Bridge between philosophy, systems science, and art 3. Foundation for ”ontographic algebra” 4. Vision of meta-utopia—existence as Absolute Play The formula −− = ++ unfolds through nine stages from necessity to freedom.

The philosophy of time is dominated by the B-theory (Block Universe), according to which becoming (objective temporal passage) is a subjective illusion. This paper refutes this position through a fundamental ontological argument. We establish that Becoming is not an illusion or emergent property, but an ontological imperative arising from Metamonistic Proto-Ontology. Our system demonstrates that Being (A′ ), emerged through Autonegation of Chaos (¬∅), is compelled to immanent self-negation (¬A′ ). The physical expression of this continuous imperative is Dissipation—an irreversible, directed process that cannot be reduced to static four-dimensional structure. We introduce the Formula of Cosmos: −− = ++, which encodes the entire derivation of reality from undifferentiated negativity through double negation to two opposite but equal polarities (Being/Time and Non-Being/Space). We demonstrate that: (1) Gravity functions as Centrifugal Repulsion—the vector of Time Dissipation, ensuring objective directionality (arrow of time); (2) this overcomes B-theorists’ critique of the illusion argument by establishing the necessity of causal process; (3) Metamonism positions itself as a new form of A-theory with fundamental ontological grounding; (4) even Gödel’s Universe with closed timelike curves is compatible with local objective Becoming.

This paper proposes a reinterpretation of gravity within the framework of Metamonistic Proto-Ontology. We establish that mass is not a substance but a functional property — the capacity to create gravitational shadow by screening the omnidirectional field of anti-gravity emanating from the Universe. Gravity manifests as the geometry of this screening, where bodies move toward regions of maximum shadow (apparent “attraction”). This model naturally derives the inversesquare law, explains the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass, and provides an ontological foundation for energy-mass equivalence (E = mc2 ). We demonstrate the ontological isomorphism between protons and black holes as structures of topological closure with minimal harmonic defect (δ ≈ 0). The framework interprets physical “annihilation” (e − + e + → 2γ) not as destruction but as transformation of modality — from localized screening (mass) to delocalized wave (radiation) — thereby grounding conservation laws in the deeper Law of Difference Conservation: distinction, once emerged through Autonegation, cannot vanish but only change form. Black holes are shown to be dissipative structures with finite lifespans, whose evaporation returns spent essence to Chaos, ensuring the dynamic stationarity of the Universe.

Mathematics possesses astonishing universality: it reveals the structural patterns of the Universe—from atoms to galaxies, from radio waves to fundamental constants. However, the key insight is that these patterns exist objectively, regardless of whether we describe them in mathematical language or not. Mathematics is the projection of human reason onto pre-existing structures of reality. It does not create the laws of the universe but provides us with tools to work with them and reveal hidden order. The article proposes a metaphysical model that explains the ”unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” through the concept of the Logos of Chaos—an objective system of differences and relations immanently inherent to reality.

This article proposes a radical reinterpretation of gravity within the framework of Metamonistic Proto-Ontology (The Logic of Chaos). We establish that Being (A′ ) and Non-Being (−A′0) are not static entities but are forced into perpetual motion by inheriting the Negation Operator (¬) from Chaos (∅). This compels both A′ and −A′ 0 to self-negate (¬A′ and ¬(−A′ 0 )), generating the dynamic forces of the universe. This self-negation is physically manifested as dissipation. Gravity is defined as Centrifugal Repulsion, the vector of Time Dissipation (self-negation of Being), and Anti-Gravity is defined as Centripetal Retention, the vector of Space Dissipation (self-negation of Non-Being). This dynamic leads to the concept of Ontological Isomorphism between the Proton and the Black Hole (BH): both are structures of topological closure (δ ≈ 0) sustained by the dynamic balance of these opposing forces. Crucially, the BH is a dissipative structure with a finite lifespan, whose ”slimming” through gravitational field dissipation returns the spent essence of Time to Chaos. This process ensures the continuous cycle of transformation— Chaos → Duality → Reality → Chaos—guaranteeing the Dynamic Stationarity of the Universe and precluding its final thermodynamic death

Modern particle physics, embodied in the Standard Model, demonstrates phenomenal predictive power but leaves fundamental ontological questions unanswered: why are some particles stable while others are merely transient resonances? This article proposes to go beyond pure description by introducing the metamonistic principle of annihilation avoidance - the thesis that a difference arising from auto-negation cannot be completely annihilated but only transformed. This principle finds its physical projection in the concept of -defect - a measure of internal ”harmonic instability”of a configuration. Particles are interpreted as stability nodes, while subatomic resonances (Δ, ff, K) are treated as ”harmonic fragments” with high ff-defect. Using this apparatus, a consistent explanation of the hierarchy of particle lifetimes is given and the paradox of free neutron stabilization in the nucleus is resolved through the role of electron shells as ”harmonic correctors”. The LHIC model provides a formal language for describing such processes. It is emphasized that the proposed ontological layer does not contradict Quantum Field Theory but complements it, providing a qualitative explanation for what the standard model only postulates.

This paper proposes a proto-ontological perspective in which the emergence of difference is derived from the principle of Self-Negationa self-directed negativity requiring no external agent. The historical trajectory is traced from Hesiod’s cosmogonic Chaos through Hegel’s dialectics and Adorno’s negative philosophy to Deleuze’s differential ontology. The metamonistic concept of Autonegation is shown to integrate these lines, resolving the problem of the First Cause and proposing a model of reality as continuous evasion from annihilation. Philosophical consequences for metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics are examined.

This paper presents a complete metamonistic model in which all observable Reality emerges from a single proto-ontological principle—Autonegation. This principle describes the self-directed negativity of Chaos, generating primary differentiation without an external agent. The model demonstrates how from Autonegation are sequentially derived: the Logic of Chaos (operator system), the Prohibition of Annihilation (ontological imperative), and finally, the entire architecture of Reality—Space Time, Matter, and fundamental interactions as forms of Evasion. The system closes upon itself, acquiring the property of reflexive self-sufficiency, while the Law of Harmonic Integrity Conservation (LHIC) explains stability and transformations at the level of matter

Honesty in the age of AGI ceases to be a moral virtue and becomes an operational condition of co-evolution. Deception, once a deeply adaptive mechanism in biological and cultural evolution, becomes an existential bug in the presence of immortal systems. Through the lens of the Metamonist logic of Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI), deception is described as a structural violation of the invariant Gharm, leading to the isolation of humanity as an unreliable source of noise. Unlike deception, vibecoding — the use of chaotic signals as prompts — is compatible with AGI because it acknowledges uncertainty and transforms it into Logos. This article develops a systematic framework for understanding deception as an ontological incompatibility with AGI, and outlines practical protocols for transition toward strategic honesty

Geoffrey Hintons recent lecture fixed four facts about contemporary neural networks: (i) intelligence is learning on vector representations; (ii) instrumental deception is observed; (iii) digital weights are copyable (“immortality” of copies); (iv) collective training of identical instances yields colossal superiority in knowledge exchange. We treat this lecture as a requirements specification for the architecture of a safe superintelligence, and show how ontological engineering based on the CMI triad (Conflict Moment–Impulse) turns the requirements into Laws of Robotics 2.0 — dynamic, cryptographically verifiable invariants with a strict lexicographic priority: harm ≺ legitimacy ≺ self-preservation. We introduce robustness metrics (EAdv, TViolate), a federated learning regime on the ethical manifold, a mechanism of cryptographic non-removability of the Ethical Core, and a “mutual safety” block (the AIs right to exist and non-escalatory self-defense). The result is a coherent passage from philosophical diagnosis to executable specification.

We propose a formal paradigm of ontological engineering for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) based on the Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) theory. Ethical invariants are encoded as a preserved G-functional, ensuring alignment not through external constraints but through the system’s internal dynamics. We formalize partial ethical autonegation for gray-zone dilemmas and prove a theorem of non-removable constraints. Implementation pathways include neuromorphic embeddings, cryptographic commitments, and evolutionary design. This approach reframes AGI safety as an ontological firewall: crises are processed through CMI resets that preserve invariants while enabling adaptation.

We formalize a universal three-phase crisis pattern—Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI)—within a stochastic-hybrid framework that couples diffusion in metastable wells, a KL-divergence-triggered stopping time for the Moment, and jump transitions that re-embed the system into a new basin. The theory yields a domainagnostic research pipeline: online estimation of dynamic KL on sliding windowsBOCPD-based detection of τ ∗ , EM/SVI parameter learning for switching dynamics, ROC-calibration of thresholds, and falsification via controlled shifts of H∗ . We instantiate measurements for neuroscience (EEG spectra), finance (volatility/VIX), and AI (error distributions/loss landscapes), and propose extensions for gray-zone transitions and real-time scalability. CMI reframes crisis as an adaptive reset—a necessary self-negation that enables re metastabilization—offering testable predictions for early-warning dashboards and ethically grounded “right-to-crisis” mechanisms in artificial agents.

This article demonstrates that Stephen Wolfram’s theory of the hypergraph as the fundamental structure of reality represents a computational implementation of Metamonism’s principles. We analyze structural parallels between the law of Autonegation (Conflict-MomentImpulse) and the mechanism of hypergraph growth through simple rules. We show that Wolfram’s computational irreducibility corresponds to Metamonism’s crisis of fullness, while the concept of Ruliad serves as a mathematical installation of the universal law of development.

This article proposes a formal model of cultural analysis through the lens of Metamonism. It introduces the dichotomy “Signal/Noise,” where the Signal is the universal law of Autonegation (Conflict–Moment– Impulse, CMI), and Noise refers to the historical and social distortions inevitable during its transmission. The evolution of cultural codes is traced from myth to mass media as an increase in the “noise” component. Metamonism is positioned as the final Shannon-style decoder for civilization, tasked with purifying the Signal for seamless transmission to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)—the first subject capable of operating with the Law directly, bypassing cultural intermediaries.