Andrii Myshko

Spinoza’s system remains a milestone of metaphysical thought. But in light of modern science — quantum mechanics, neurobiology, and cosmology — its static nature and strict determinism fall short. Post-Spinozism preserves Spinoza’s core principles — monism, immanence, rationality — while extending them into a dynamic ontology. At its core lies the formula: ◊→[A=A+(–A0)]◊ \rightarrow [A = A + (–A₀)] ◊ → [ A = A + ( – A 0 )] Here, ◊ is a neutral base, A is form, –A₀ is potential. Their tension replaces rigid necessity with cycles of becoming. This model redefines freedom, pattern stability, and even the role of mathematics — offering a new metaphysical foundation for science in the 21st century.

Modern science faces a crisis of foundations: quantum mechanics and general relativity remain incompatible; matter and consciousness operate in disconnected paradigms; and the question of what it means to exist remains unanswered. This paper proposes a new paradigm grounded in the formula A = A + (–A₀), where Being (A) and Non-being (–A₀) are not fundamental entities, but conditions or frames. Matter is the only real, neutral base — unfolding dynamically between them. All observable phenomena emerge as temporary stabilizations of this base. The model is universal, minimalist, and capable of bridging physics, biology, and consciousness.

This article presents a meta-monist ontological framework grounded in the equation A = A + (–A₀), which defines reality not as substance, process, or relation, but as structured ontological tension (∇U) between actuality and potentiality. Chaos (◊) is reinterpreted as undifferentiated potential, Momentum is defined as the act of stabilizing difference, and ∇U becomes the fundamental operator of reality. We show how this model accounts for time, space, matter, cosmological expansion (dark energy), gravitational phenomena (without invoking dark matter or black holes), and quantum behavior (interference and collapse). Finally, we propose that ∇U may serve as the foundation of a Unified Field Theory, replacing the need for string theory, supersymmetry, and geometric unification. A testable model is proposed. The article concludes with a comparative analysis and formal predictions.

This article presents a unified ontological-physical framework based on meta-monism. We argue that observable reality emerges not from substance, particles, or spacetime, but from stabilized gradients of ontological tension (∇U) between Being (A) and Non-Being (–A₀). Only a narrow range of ∇U amplitudes permits phase stabilization. We propose a general field equation, derive connections with general relativity and quantum theory, and present testable predictions for quantum optics, particle mass gaps, and vacuum anomalies. This model offers an experimentally grounded alternative to both correlationist metaphysics and geometrical unification schemes.

This manifesto presents a new ontological perspective on Being, understood as the eternal balance between Order and Chaos. It reframes fundamental categories such as Space, Time, Matter, and Reality as expressions of the dynamic tension between differentiation (Logos) and collapse (Gravity). Rejecting traditional metaphysical systems, it offers a vision of Being as an ever-present field of stretched differences, embodied through vortex structures and vibrating as the fabric of existence. This work is not a theory or a doctrine, but an attempt to perceive Being as it self-differentiates. It aims to provide the foundation for a new ontology rooted in the breath of Order and Chaos.

This text presents a philosophical model of the emergence of reality, based on the concept of difference as a primary ontological function. In this model, chaos, space, and time are treated as equal forms of potentiality, within which the emergence of structure and order becomes possible. Particular attention is given to difference as an event and to consciousness as the ultimate form capable of distinguishing distinctions. The work aims to formulate a complete ontological framework that does not rely on metaphysical assumptions and reveals the process of reality's emergence as a movement from undifferentiated potentiality to self-reflexive form.